Decision details

DECISION: To refuse

Reasons

1.    The proposal, due to its size and setting is contrary to the requirements of policies PCYFF 3 and TAI 4 of the LDP. It is considered that the proposal would be contrary to the development pattern due to the lack of curtilage /open area around the house.  It is not considered that the proposal will add to or improve the character and appearance of the site and there would be a loss of an open space between existing dwellings that will damage the appearance and character of the streetscape and the conservation area. 

2.    It is considered that the proposal is contrary to the requirements of policies PS19, PS20, AT 1 and AMG 1 of the LDP as the proposal would not, due to the loss of an open space as well as the size and appearance of the house, safeguard or improve the setting and appearance of the conservation area or the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and the important views in and out of the area.