• Calendar
  • Committees
  • Community Councils
  • Consultations
  • Decisions
  • Election results
  • ePetitions
  • Forthcoming Decisions
  • Forward Plans
  • Library
  • Meetings
  • Outside bodies
  • Search documents
  • Subscribe to updates
  • Your councillors
  • Your MPs
  • Your MEPs
  • What's new
  • Issue - meetings

    BASELINE REVIEW

    • Issue Details
    • Issue History
    • Related Decisions
    • Related Meetings
     

     

    Meeting: 31/07/2020 - North Wales Economic Ambition Board (Item 9)

    PROJECT BASELINE REVIEW

    Report to be circulated separately for Board members only.

    Decision:

    (a) To note the content of the baseline review report and the presentation delivered at the meeting, and continue the development of projects to assist in securing the Final Growth Deal at the earliest opportunity.

    (b) To confirm the renaming of the 'Land-based Industries and Tourism Programme' as the Agri-Food and Tourism Programme.

    (c) To confirm the renaming of the 'Advanced Manufacturing Programme' as the Innovation in High Value Manufacturing Programme.

     

    Minutes:

    The report was submitted by Hedd Vaughan-Evans, Operations Manager.

     

    RESOLVED

    (a)     To note the content of the baseline review report and the presentation delivered at the meeting, and to continue to develop projects in order to assist to ensure the Final Growth Agreement at the earliest potential opportunity.

    (b)     To confirm the renaming of the 'Land-based Industries and Tourism Programme' as the Agri-Food and Tourism Programme.

    (c)     To confirm the renaming of the 'Advanced Manufacturing Programme' as the Innovation in High Value Manufacturing Programme.

     

    REASONS FOR THE DECISION

     

    To update the North Wales Economic Ambition Board on the position of each programme and project as part of the process to reach a Final Agreement for the North Wales Growth Deal.

     

    To receive the approval of the Board to rename two of the programmes so that they reflected their relevant terms of reference more accurately.

     

    DISCUSSION

     

    The report was discussed.