5 NWEAB'S REVENUE AND CAPITAL OUT-TURN POSITION FOR 2022-23
PDF 537 KB
Dewi A.Morgan (Host Authority Head of Finance - Statutory
Finance Officer) and Sian Pugh (Host Authority Assistant Head of Finance) to
present the report.
Additional documents:
Decision:
1. To note and accept the
NWEAB’s revenue out-turn report for 2022/23 (Appendix 1 to the report), the
NWEAB's reserves (Appendix 2) and the Capital End of Year Review as at 31 March
2023 (Appendix 3).
2. To approve for the £148,000
revenue underspend for 2022/23 to be transferred to the 2023/24 budget, with
£18,000 of it added to the Business Delivery Board heading and £130,000 added
to the Projects heading.
Minutes:
The context was set out by Dewi A. Morgan (Host
Authority Head of Finance – Statutory Finance Officer) and Sian Pugh (Host
Authority Assistant Head of Finance) elaborated on the content of the report.
RESOLVED
1. To
note and accept the NWEAB’s revenue out-turn report for 2022/23 (Appendix 1 to
the report), the NWEAB's reserves (Appendix 2) and the Capital End of Year
Review as at 31 March 2023 (Appendix 3).
2. To
approve for the £148,000 revenue underspend for 2022/23 to be transferred to
the 2023/24 budget, with £18,000 of it added to the Business Delivery Board
heading and £130,000 added to the Projects heading.
REASONS FOR THE
DECISION
To inform the NWEAB of its
financial position for both revenue and capital in 2022/23.
DISCUSSION
In response to a question,
it was explained that £18,000 needed to be added to the Business Delivery Board
heading (recommendation 2) because the Board's work of tendering a contract had
slipped to the first part of 2023/24.
It was further explained:-
·
That the Portfolio Management Office had advertised
for a partner to collaborate on a specific brief on behalf of the Business
Delivery Board and an advisory team from the business sector.
·
That the brief outlined a process for engaging with
a partner which could create a baseline report for us and look at the North
Wales economy and the sectors that are here, assessing the strengths and
opportunities within that sector.
·
That the initial brief had been very challenging for
the partners. It was sought the encourage
as much profit as possible, but unfortunately no response was received to the
tender.
·
That another provider had contacted very recently
and had asked to submit a tender, and that provider was asked to develop an
offer over the following three weeks.
·
That the baseline report would be of assistance to
respond to the requirement to provide an investment strategy in order to show
how the Growth Deal would leverage more than £722m which would be needed to
deliver the £1bn Growth Deal in its entirety over the period.
In response to a further
question, it was explained that the amount of £722m was based on how much
investment would have to be leveraged from the private sector, which combined
with the previous commitment of both governments to provide £240m over the
period, and that an additional amount had been earmarked to come in as
additional funding from the public sector as well.