To approve the Budget
for 2024/25 for the North
Wales Corporate Joint Committee.
Additional documents:
Decision:
1. To
approve the Budget for 2024/5 for the North Wales Corporate Joint Committee
(CJC) as presented in the appendix to the report. To approve the budget as noted below:-
|
Strategic Planning |
Transportation
|
Corporate Joint Committee |
Total Budget |
|
£ |
£ |
£
|
£ |
|
371,250 |
182,750 |
210,820 |
764,820 |
2.
To
approve the levy on the constituent authorities, as noted below:-
|
|
Strategic Planning |
Other Functions |
Total
Levy |
|
|
£
|
£ |
£ |
|
Conwy County Borough Council |
(58,510) |
(65,370) |
(123,880) |
|
Denbighshire Council |
(52,080) |
(55,220) |
(107,300) |
|
Flintshire County Council |
(83,780) |
(88,830) |
(172,610) |
|
Gwynedd Council |
(53,870) |
(67,260) |
(121,130) |
|
Isle of Anglesey County Council |
(37,230) |
(39,480) |
(76,710) |
|
Wrexham County Borough Council |
(73,010) |
(77,410) |
(150,420) |
|
Eryri National Park Authority |
(12,770) |
|
(12,770) |
|
Total Levy |
(371,250) |
(393,570) |
(764,820) |
Minutes:
The report was submitted by Dewi Morgan, Chief Finance Officer.
RESOLVED:
1.
To approve the Budget for
2024/5 for the North Wales Corporate Joint Committee (CJC) as presented in the
appendix to the report. To approve the
budget as noted below:-
|
Strategic Planning |
Transport |
Corporate Joint Committee |
Total Budget |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
|
371,250 |
182,750 |
210,820 |
764,820 |
2.
To
approve the levy on the constituent authorities, as noted below:-
|
|
Strategic Planning |
Other Functions |
Total Levy |
|
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
|
Conwy County Borough Council |
(58,510)
|
(65,370)
|
(123,880)
|
|
Denbighshire Council |
(52,080)
|
(55,220)
|
(107,300)
|
|
Flintshire County Council |
(83,780)
|
(88,830)
|
(172,610)
|
|
Cyngor Gwynedd
|
(53,870)
|
(67,260)
|
(121,130)
|
|
Isle of Anglesey County Council |
(37,230)
|
(39,480)
|
(76,710)
|
|
Wrexham County Borough Council |
(73,010)
|
(77,410)
|
(150,420)
|
|
Eryri
National Park Authority |
(12,770) |
|
(12,770) |
|
Total
Levy |
(371,250)
|
(393,570)
|
(764,820) |
DISCUSSION
1. The Budget
It was noted that a significant amount of money had
been earmarked for the Strategic Planning element and it was asked if that
meant doing away with some of the work that the councils currently carried out
individually, thereby creating savings for the councils, or would it mean more
work and more cost to the councils. In response, it was noted:-
·
That it was important to
find a way to be able to represent value for money for the authorities locally
from the existence of the CJC.
·
It was not yet entirely clear
what the long-term objective to aim for in terms of Welsh Government would be,
but there were certainly opportunities here to collaborate more effectively
regionally on certain elements of work.
E.g. there were discussions in place about the possibility of regional
collaboration on matters such as energy procurement to see whether there was a
way of being more financially effective, so that the savings would feed back to
councils locally for core services.
·
That it was difficult to
say at the moment, particularly from the Strategic Planning perspective, what
the benefits would be for the particular stakeholders, but that there were
elements of work that were currently being duplicated across the counties on an
evidentiary basis for their own individual plans.
·
That it was hoped that, in
centralising some parts of that evidence, it would then be easier to obtain
evidence at a local level by working regionally.
·
That time would tell what
the knock-on effect of that would be in terms of any particular efficiency in
the areas within the region, but that would certainly be the ambition, that we
would be in a position of being able to share information and evidence to make
the local processes easier.
It was noted that it was important to keep track of
this element.
Concern was raised about the proposed 6% inflation
estimate for wages in 2024/25, but it was explained that that was funded out of
reserves and that there would be no increase in partner contributions.
It was noted that there was a sense within the councils that the Corporate Joint Committee was optional, rather than a legislative responsibility, and it was warned that ... view the full minutes text for item 5