7 ANNUAL REVIEW - COUNCIL'S PAY POLICY 2024/25 PDF 124 KB
To submit
the report of the Chair of the Chief Officer Appointments Committee.
Additional documents:
Decision:
To approve the recommendation of the Chief Officers
Appointment Committee to adopt the Pay Policy for 2024/25.
Minutes:
The Chair of the Chief Officer Appointment Committee,
Councillor Menna Trenholme, presented a report recommending that the Council
approve the recommendation of the Chief Officer Appointment Committee to adopt
the Pay Policy Statement for 2024/25.
Reference was made to the substantial delay in 2023
before reaching an agreement on the increase in the salaries of all Council
staff as a result of the current bargaining process. This process had
contributed to the discussions on setting budgets and sought to give Councils
assurances on salary levels. Lengthy discussions had been held between the
Unions and the Council regarding how much the Council could afford, which had
led to a delay before a decision was made. It was added that the discussions
for 2024/25 salaries had not yet commenced and that months would pass again
before a decision would be made on this.
Members were given an opportunity to make
observations and ask questions. The following matters were raised:-
·
It was noted that page 30
of the report referred to the Hutton Review of Fair Pay in the Public Sector
and recommended a ratio of no more than 1:20 between the highest and lowest
salary (full-time). It was reiterated that the report noted that this ratio in
Cyngor Gwynedd was 1:5.6. It was added that many posts at the lowest level were
not full-time posts and that it would be good to ascertain what the ratio would
be if part-time posts were considered, e.g. 23 hour-a-week contracts or a
School Classroom Assistant who worked during term-time only.
·
Reference was made to part 5 of the table (Appendix 1) on page 34, noting
that the table would be clearer if every post was noted there one under the
other, despite the fact that they were on the same scale. It was believed that
the use of punctuation did not make it clear in its current format.
·
It was noted that the
Cabinet Member for Corporate Support, in response to a member's question
earlier on, had noted that staff turnover levels were low in this Authority,
noting that there were exceptions such as in Social Services and Engineering.
An enquiry was made about the scenarios where a market supplement to the salary
level would be justified.
In response, the Chief Executive noted:-
·
That this was a
pro-rata ratio in order to provide a fair comparison of both salary levels. It
was proposed to provide the figure based on staff who did not work full-time
hours to the member after the meeting, if he was interested to receive this
information.
·
He accepted the member's comment on the table in the report, and noted
that the punctuation would be amended in the future in order to make it neater.
·
It was noted that market supplements were rarely used as this was not
customary in any fixed circumstances.