12 CAPITAL STRATEGY 2024/25 (INCLUDING INVESTMENT AND BORROWING STRATEGIES)
PDF 159 KB
To submit
the report of the Cabinet Member for Finance.
Additional documents:
Decision:
To accept
the report and to approve the Capital Strategy for 2024/25
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member
for Finance, Councillor Ioan Thomas, submitted the report which
addressed the
statutory requirement on Councils and provided a long-term context to
capital expenditure
and investment decisions by Councils. It was noted that the report
also provided an
overview of how the associated risks were managed and the
implications for
future financial sustainability.
The Head of Finance
added that the report referred to 3 appendices but unfortunately
the appendices had
not been included in the Agenda papers. It was noted
that these
appendices provided
further details but that sufficient information had
been included
in the report.
A table entitled "Approved Investment
Counterparties and limitations" was shown to members and it was reported
that the table being shown provided the information that was missing in the
appendices. Apologies were expressed for the failure to include the appendices
and it was added that they had been included in the Agenda
papers of the Governance and Audit Committee and that they had been considered
there in full.
Please find enclosed a copy of the table.

The Monitoring Officer gave assurance that the report
in the Agenda papers was comprehensive, along with the
above table that was shown and that it placed members in a position where they
were able to vote and adopt the strategy.
Members were given an opportunity to make
observations and ask questions. The
following matters were raised by individual members:-
Members expressed gratitude for the report as well as to Arlingclose for their presentation to Council members back
in February. It was noted that the field
was very technical but that Arlingclose
had made it easier to understand. Appreciation was expressed that this
presentation had been available to every Councillor and not just to members of
the Governance and Audit Committee as usually was the case.
It was confirmed that the members were in a position
to make a decision since the report was comprehensive.