9 SAFEGUARDING ARRANGEMENTS IN SCHOOLS
PDF 165 KB
Cabinet Member – Councillor Beca Brown
To consider
a report on the above.
Additional documents:
Decision:
1.
To accept the report and to note
the observations.
2.
To recommend that the Education Department provides a simple guidance on referreing any
concerns, for use by all who deal with the system, such as governors and parents.
Minutes:
Dylan
Owen (Statutory Director of Social Services) and Llion Williams (Assistant
Head: Well-being and Equality) were welcomed to the meeting.
Submitted – the report of the Cabinet Member for
Education in response to a request by the members to receive information on
safeguarding arrangements in schools, and on the guidance and support provided
in this field by the Education Department so as to
give assurance to committee members of the appropriateness of the arrangements.
The Cabinet Member for Education set out the context
and the Head of Education also delivered a few words at the beginning.
Members
were then given an opportunity to ask questions and submit observations.
It was noted that a DBS check did not prove that
someone was a safe person, but rather stated that a person had not yet been
found guilty of a crime. In response, it was noted that:-
·
They agreed with the
observation, and as well as the DBS, this Council asked for two references
before appointing to any post.
·
There were only 0.07% of staff without a DBS at the moment, and there were specific reasons for that,
e.g. long-term illness, a person suspended from work or people on supply lists
who no longer wished to work for Gwynedd.
·
Efforts were underway
almost daily to meet the 100% target.
·
The Safeguarding
Operational Group monitored how many people have had a DBS, and if the
percentages were lower than expected, it asked what was the
explanation and justification for that.
It was enquired how much monitoring took place to
ensure that the designated safeguarding person in a school completed all the
necessary training. In response, it was noted:-
·
That training was
provided by the Authority in the form of small groups, so that people had the
opportunity to ask questions that they might not ask in larger groups.
·
That the nature of the
training was now more fun and interactive, and that the feedback from these
annual sessions was very positive.
·
In terms of
monitoring, governing bodies had a responsibility to have a person overseeing
child protection on the body, and that person would be expected to meet with
the designated safeguarding person to discuss the situation in the school in
terms of safeguarding children.
·
That training was also
provided for governors on their monitoring role and supporting the designated
safeguarding person within the school.
·
That Gwynedd was one
of the few authorities in Wales that undertook quality assurance checks, where
the designated officer in the county goes to a school and carries out a
detailed investigation which then feeds into an authority overview. By doing so, they could see if there were things that were not being done properly, what they
were and whether the training needed to be refined to improve the guidance
given to designated persons.
·
That the Safeguarding
Operational Group monitored the number of people who had received safeguarding
training, etc., and reported regularly to the Safeguarding Strategic Panel.
It was noted that it was hoped that ... view the full minutes text for item 9