To prepare
an Annual Report on the implementation of the Representations and Complaints
Procedure for submission to the Care Scrutiny Committee in order to scrutinise
and monitor the arrangements for dealing effectively with complaints received
from service users and their representatives.
Additional documents:
Decision:
To accept the report, noting the observations made during the discussion.
Minutes:
The report was presented by the Cabinet
Member for Adults, Health and Well-being, Cabinet Member for
Children and Families, Head of Adults, Health and Well-being Department,
Assistant Head - Safeguarding and Quality (Children and Supporting Families
Department), Assistant Head - Safeguarding, Quality Assurance, Mental Health
and Community Safety of the Adults, Health and Well-being Department.
Members
were reminded that the Council had a statutory responsibility to report on how
it investigated and responded to complaints in accordance with the Social
Services Complaints Procedure (Wales) Regulations 2014 and the Representations
Procedure (Wales) Regulations 2014. It was explained that these arrangements
for social services differed from the general complaints system operated within
the Council.
It was
confirmed that the Report shared information about the Adults, Health and
Well-being Department as well as the Children and Supporting Families
Department in a bid to ensure that the same arrangements were in place for both
departments.
It was
explained that specific criteria were used to identify which events were
appropriate to respond to. It was noted that these were usually services that
had been provided up to 12 months in advance of the complaint being lodged,
rather than historical matters.
It was
elaborated that the Stage 1 procedure was a means of trying to resolve the
complaints by receiving the team manager's response and holding direct
conversations with the complainants. It was confirmed that if this did not
resolve the situation, complainants were entitled to request an investigation
as part of the Stage 2 arrangements. It was emphasised that these were
conducted by investigators who were independent of the Council but were
individuals on a recognised list. It was explained that complainants could
start the process at Stage 2 without going through Stage 1, noting that this
was now the tendency, particularly with Children and Family cases. It was noted
that if the matter could not be resolved following an investigation, it could
be escalated to the Ombudsman. However, it was emphasised that no issue had
progressed to this stage.
It was
explained that the independent investigator was qualified, experienced and
managed to deal with the complexity of cases. It was noted that there was a
shortage of Welsh-speaking investigators and that this was a challenge for the
service and created delays in investigations as there was a need to ensure that
a Welsh speaker was available to look through information and interview
individuals. It was further expanded that there was a challenge in identifying
independent Welsh-speaking investigators as many of them had been working
locally in the area or for Gwynedd itself, resulting in a reduction in the
number of people available to carry out investigations.
It was reported that Complaints Officers and Senior Complaints Officers were available to facilitate these processes. It was emphasised that they administered the processes objectively, even though the service was located within social services. It was noted that this work could be challenging due to complainants' frustration and dissatisfaction with the service they wanted to complain about. ... view the full minutes text for item 7