Notice of Motion by Councillor Delyth Lloyd Griffiths
In accordance with the Notice of Motion received under Section 4.19 of
the Constitution, Councillor Delyth Lloyd Griffiths will propose as follows:-
A house has been exchanged a number of times in
a small village in a rural ward in Gwynedd. This happened during a time when 12
local people (family units) were waiting for social housing in the village. The
householders are not from Wales and were not waiting for more than 12 months.
Cyngor Gwynedd’s letting policy is undermined every time a house is
exchanged while local people remain on the waiting list for long periods
without being able to secure a home.
This council believes that the Welsh Government's practice of exchanging
social housing should cease immediately, unless the house is exchanged within
the local authority. I seek Cyngor Gwynedd's support today to put pressure on
the Welsh Government to change the law to meet the need for local housing.
Additional documents:
Decision:
In order to satisfy
the need for local housing, this Council brings pressure to bear on the Welsh
Government for the practice of exchanging social housing to cease immediately,
unless the house is exchanged within the local authority, or close to the
county's boundary.
Minutes:
Submitted - the following notice of motion by
Councillor Delyth Lloyd Griffiths under Section 4.19 of the Constitution, and
it was seconded: -
In order to satisfy the need for local housing, this
Council brings pressure to bear on the Welsh Government for the practice of
exchanging social housing to cease immediately, unless the house is exchanged
[other than] within the local authority, or close to the county's boundary.
The member set out the context to her motion, noting:
·
That a house in a rural
village in her ward had been swapped twice in the past two years with people
from outside Wales, and advertised again online this week.
·
Adra reported that 50 of their houses have been swapped in the last year,
with only 4 swapped with people from outside Gwynedd. The other housing
associations also reported low figures.
However, if this was a national pattern, it meant that 88 houses had
been transferred in the last year to tenants who are not on any waiting list
for a house in Wales.
·
Cyngor Gwynedd's
allocations policy was being undermined every time a house was swapped while
local people remained on the waiting list for long periods of time without
being able to secure a home.
During the discussion, the following
observations were made: -
It was suggested that the ability to exchange
social housing was a means of solving problems or improving the situation of
individuals or families, and enabled people to stay in their communities.
However, this required better management. It was noted that the proposer, in
submitting her motion, had stated that the practice of social housing exchanges
should be ended unless the house was exchanged within the local authority, or
very close to the county boundary. However,
as the original proposal as it appeared on this meeting's agenda did not
contain the words 'or very close to the county boundary', and the wish was to
propose a formal amendment to this end. Concern was raised about restricting exchanges to
Gwynedd only as some communities close to the county border had close contact
with communities in a neighbouring county.
The Monitoring Officer noted that as the
proposer had recited the words 'or very close to the county boundary',
that she could, with the meeting's consent, modify the motion without
proceeding to have a formal amendment.
The proposer agreed to modify her proposal and
the meeting consented to that.
It was asked what 'very close' meant. In response, the Monitoring Officer noted that there
was no legal term for ' close' and that it would not be appropriate for the
Council to attempt to produce a precise definition of that. The motion asked
the Council to write to the Welsh Government with a request to change the law
and that this was the place to have that detailed discussion.
It was suggested that the proposal was almost irrelevant as the numbers of exchanges involved were very small and everyone's circumstances were different. The housing associations also ... view the full minutes text for item 13