Full planning application for the creation of a depot comprising of offices, workshop, storage buildings together with associated works
LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Dewi Jones
Link to relevant background documents
Additional documents:
Decision:
DECISION: To approve subject to the following
conditions:
1. Five years.
2. In accordance with plans and documents.
3. Agree on sound prevention plan and measures
for the workshop in the western end of the site. This could include measures
such as insulation, agreeing on the location of any extraction systems, hours
of use and acoustic fence.
4. Ensure use of bilingual signs that give
priority to the Welsh language.
5. Landscaping.
6. Landscape maintenance.
7. Need to agree on any extraction systems on
the workshop prior to their installation on the building.
Minutes:
Full application for the creation of a depot
comprising of offices, workshop, storage buildings together with associated
works.
Attention
was drawn to the late observations form.
a) The
Development Control Team Leader highlighted that the site was located within
the Caernarfon development boundary and all was within
an area protected as the principal employment site for employment use. It was
supported that the site was served by an unclassified county road leading
through the estate and it was intended to include provision for 44 car parking
spaces (including 3 for the disabled), 10 for lorries and 8 for other machinery
as well as cycle storage space.
With the site located
within the Caernarfon development boundary and a protected area for employment
and in particular industrial uses B1, B2 and B8, the principle of intent was
acceptable in terms of policies PCYFF 1 and CYF 1. The land was described as fairly flat and backed onto the rest of the estate which is
at a significantly higher level to the north. It was recognised that the single
and double-storey units would be visible from the Caernarfon bypass and would
add to the structures and equipment storage areas in the landscape. However,
the existing estate would form a backdrop to the site and, therefore, reduce
the impact of the proposal on the landscape. Reference was made to a site plan
and a cross-section plan which highlighted the intention to implement a
landscaping scheme for the southern, western and northern boundary of the site
which would include tree retention along the southern boundary. As a result, it
was not considered that the proposal would have an unacceptable visual impact.
In the context of
general and residential matters it was noted that the largest proposed building
would be located at the western end of the site, approximately 17 metres from
the boundary and approximately 28 metres from the rear view of nearest neighbours'
houses. It was highlighted that it was intended to install additional
insulation material on the rear wall of the building to reduce any noise that
would result from it. It was reported that the planning statement stated that
this was intended as a maintenance shed and that noise was not expected to
derive from it. There were no windows or doors on the rear view and the
building would also alleviate noise emanating from elsewhere on the site. It was therefore considered that there was
potential to add to the noise mitigation measures by imposing appropriate
conditions to minimise adverse impact on neighbouring residents.
Highways,
biodiversity, and linguistic issues were referred to and had received
appropriate attention.
The officers
recommended approving the application
b) Taking
advantage of the right to speak, the applicant noted the following observations;
·
The site was located on a plot of land designated
for development
·
That the company needs to increase their existing
workshop in the area
· Proposed use and economic benefits. Following an increase in business, responding by attempting to combine five regional depots to centralise ... view the full minutes text for item 13