8 CHILDREN AND SUPPORTING FAMILIES CABINET MEMBER PERFORMANCE REPORT (11:45 - 13:00)
PDF 429 KB
To report to
the Scrutiny Committee on the performance of the Children and Supporting
Families Department.
Additional documents:
Decision:
To accept
the report.
Minutes:
The report
was submitted by the Cabinet Member for Children and Supporting Families and
the Head of Department.
It was
reported that the department implemented the Council Plan 2023-2028 and
reported on the progress made to the end of March 2025, acknowledging that it
was still early days in the context of some of the new pledges in the document
since April last year.
It was
noted that the Children and Supporting Families Department had two projects in
the Council Plan, namely the Autism Plan and Developing a residential provision
for looked after children in small group homes plan. It was explained that the
Autism Plan was thriving, with a training programme for front-line staff
continuing with the aim of being a local authority with an understanding and
awareness of autism. It was also mentioned that the collaboration with the
Education Department continued with internal and external staff engaging with
the third sector. Pride was expressed that there was currently no waiting list
for the Autism Team, but it was assumed that this would not continue for long
as there was a high demand for the service.
It was
explained that the developing a residential provision for looked after children
in small group homes plan had significantly developed over the past year. It
was noted that staff had been appointed to the first home in Morfa Bychan and two children were welcomed to the placement. It
was also reported that two additional properties had been purchased, and
preparation work had commenced to get them to a registration standard.
During the
discussion, the following observations were made by the Members:
Enquiries
were made about the Derwen service, specifically regarding the access criteria
for the Derwen service. It was explained that the criteria were if the child
had a learning disability or a significant delay in more than one development
field. The member noted that he appreciated all of
Derwen's great work but that this meant that many families with children who
needed a similar service to what Derwen offered were missing out as they did
not fit into the learning disability criteria. It was believed that the Council
only defined based on 'IQ' and therefore many children, for example children
with autism, were missing out on the service that they required. It was
explained that the Council did not use 'IQ' for the Derwen criteria, but it was
acknowledged that there was a gap and that was the reason for establishing the
autism team to try to address part of the gap.
It was asked whether the department could provide assurance that every autism team worker had received training to the highest level in the autism field. It was noted that it was one of the department's priorities to ensure that public-facing staff received appropriate and relevant training for the work that they did. It was explained that they could not say with certainty that every staff member had currently received the training, but the programme was in place and the ... view the full minutes text for item 8