10 SCRUTINY ANNUAL REPORT 2024-25
PDF 120 KB
To submit the Scrutiny Annual Report.
Additional documents:
Decision:
To
accept the report.
Minutes:
Councillor
Beth Lawton, Chair of the Scrutiny Forum during 2024/25, presented the report.
It was
noted that the report gave an overview of the scrutiny work done in 2024-25, highlighting
the reason for scrutinising and the impact of the scrutiny work. It was
highlighted that 41 items had been scrutinised. Attention was drawn to several
pieces of work done, which included the establishment of the Safeguarding
Arrangements in Schools Scrutiny Investigation, which would report on the work
in 2025/26. Another example where the Care Scrutiny Committee had invited
external partners on three occasions, and the Communities Scrutiny Committee
had pre-scrutinised the proposal to introduce an Article 4 Direction to control
the use of second homes and holiday accommodation.
It was
expressed that practical adjustments had been made to scrutiny arrangements to
make effective use of time by holding informal meetings. It was noted that
briefing meetings would be held to give focus on the questioning strategy at
the meeting. It was noted that making clear and purposeful recommendations was
critical to good scrutiny, and it was explained that they were continuing to
develop this element, which, in turn, would enable them to identify the impact
of scrutiny.
The
officers and members were thanked for their work, as well as the Forum members
for the collaboration and the discussions which had contributed to improving
scrutiny arrangements.
Members
were given an opportunity to ask questions and offer observations.
It was
expressed that in terms of the report, it was difficult to see what the end of
the journey would be and that the actual impact of scrutiny was not obvious. A
response was given by noting that this had been identified, but some were
expressing that they were moving in the right direction in order to get a
system that worked better.
Cabinet
Members expressed gratitude for the work of the Scrutiny Committee, and that it
was reassuring that recommendations were proposed, and that they were
highlighting whether the work was going in the right direction.
RESOLVED
To
accept the Report.