Venue: Siambr Dafydd Orwig, Council Offices, Caernarfon, Gwynedd, LL55 1SH. View directions
Contact: Lowri Haf Evans 01286 679878
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES To accept any apologies for absence. Additional documents: Minutes: Councillors Simon Glyn, Louise Hughes and W Gareth Roberts (Local Member). |
|
DECLARATION OF PERSONAL INTEREST To receive any declaration of personal interest. Additional documents: Minutes: The
following members declared that they were local members in relation to the
items noted: ·
Councillor Dewi Wyn Roberts (not a member of this
Planning Committee), in relation to item 5.2 on the agenda (planning
application number C17/0412/39/LL) ·
Councillor John Brynmor Hughes, (not a member of this Planning Committee), in relation to item 5.3
on the agenda (planning application number C17/0494/39/LL) ·
Councillor Eric M Jones (a member of this Planning
Committee) in relation to item 5.5 on the agenda (planning application number
C17/0567/17/LL) The Members withdrew to the other side of the Chamber during the discussions on the applications in question and did not vote on these matters. |
|
URGENT ITEMS To note any items that are a matter of urgency in the view of the Chairman for consideration. Additional documents: |
|
The Chairman shall propose that the minutes of the previous meeting of this committee, held on, 24.7.2017, be signed as a true record. Additional documents: Minutes: The Chair signed the minutes of the previous meeting of this committee, that took place on 24 July 2017, as a true record. |
|
PLANNING APPLICATIONS To submit the report of the Head of Environment Department. Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered the following applications for development. Details of the
applications were expanded upon and questions were answered in relation to the
plans and aspects of the policies. RESOLVED |
|
Siting of 21m high telecommunications mast including a radio station, 3 antennas, 2 equipment cabinets, ancillary equipment together with a 1.8m high security fence. LOCAL MEMBER:
Councillor Judith M Humphreys Additional documents: Minutes: Erect a 21m high
telecommunications mast, including a radio station, 3 antennae, 2 equipment
cabinets, associated equipment, along with a 1.8m high security fence The Members had visited the site. Attention was drawn to a
petition that had been submitted which referred to similar issues as those
which had already been submitted along with oral observations from the Public
Protection Unit. (a)
The Planning Manager
elaborated on the background of the application, and noted that the application
had been deferred at the Planning Committee meeting on 3.7.17 so that the
Members could visit the site before making a decision. It was noted that the
site was located on the outskirts of Penygroes at the rear of the telephone exchange site
which contained one permanent single-storey building. It was explained that residential houses were
located on the far side of the public road to the direction of the north, west
and east with the following nearby, Ysgol Gynradd Bro Lleu, Ysgol Uwchradd
Dyffryn Nantlle and Plas Silyn Leisure Centre. From the information submitted, it was noted that
the reason for the proposal was to carry out the Government's aim to provide a
4G signal where it did not already exist in rural areas. In
response to the objections voiced at the Committee on 03.07.17, the applicant
submitted additional information that justified locating the mast on this
specific site and these had been included in the report. It was also
highlighted that a "Declaration of Conformity with the International
Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Public Exposure
Guidelines" had been submitted as part of this application. It
confirmed that the development had been certified as being in compliance with
ICNIRP guidelines, namely the recognised guidelines for this type of
development. An objection had been received on the grounds on
concern about the impact of the development on health, and specifically on the
health of the children at the nearby Nursery, Primary School and Secondary
School along with users of Plas Silyn Leisure Centre. Although it was acknowledged that concern had been raised regarding the
potential impact on health, it was not considered that the proposal was
contrary to national policies or the LDP and there was no need for further
information to assess the potential impact of the development. It was noted that Planning Policy Wales
stated clearly in relation to the implications of such development proposals on
health, that WG was of the opinion that the local planning authorities should
not further consider any health impacts or the concerns about them when
processing an application for planning permission or approval beforehand if the
development satisfied the requirements of ICNIRP. It was noted that with this type of development, it would inevitable that the proposed main structure would be partly visible from public places as it needed to be in a fairly open location to ensure that it worked to its full capacity. It was explained that the closest dwellings were approximately 50m and 90m away from the site of the application ... view the full minutes text for item 5.1 |
|
Application No C17/0412/39/LL - Llain Las, Abersoch, Pwllheli PDF 150 KB Formation of a touring caravan site LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Dewi Wyn Roberts Link
to relevant background documents Additional documents: Minutes: Creation of site for
touring caravans Attention was drawn to the late
observations that had been received referring to the historic use of the site
for five caravans by members of the Caravan Club. a)
The Development Control Manager elaborated on the background
of the application, noting that it was a full application to create a touring
caravan site. It was emphasised that the site was currently used
for five caravans under an exempted Camping and Caravanning Club certificate
with the proposal of using the site for nine touring caravans and using the
existing toilet block as well as planting indigenous trees along the northern
and western boundaries of the site and to re-locate the existing gate. It was
highlighted that the main consideration in terms of the principle of the
development was policy TWR 5 of the Joint Local Development Plan which
permitted proposals to develop new touring caravan sites provided the plan
conformed to all the criteria noted. It was not considered that the plan complied
with the requirements of the policy in terms of its visual impact on the
landscape. The
site was located in open countryside outside the development boundary and
within the AONB (Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty). Due to an existing hedge,
it was accepted that the caravans would not be very visible from the adjacent
county road, however, it was noted that the site was located is a hollow in the
landscape and consequently the caravans would be visible from higher ground,
specifically from the road that led from the site to the west. Formal observations had been received from
the AONB Unit stating that the site was prominent from higher ground within the
area. Attention
was drawn to the plan submitted with the application which indicated a proposal
to plant indigenous trees and hedges along the western and northern boundaries
of the site, however, it was considered that the proposed landscaping would not
significantly reduce the impact of the development on the landscape enough to
overcome concerns regarding the prominence of the site in the landscape within
the AONB. It was considered that the plan was acceptable under the
requirements of other policies, such as the impact on resident's amenities,
highway issues and biodiversity considerations. However, the proposed
development would likely have a significant detrimental impact on views within
the AONB. b)
Taking advantage of the right to speak, the
applicant noted the following main points: ·
The existing caravan site had been run by a local Welsh
family since the 50s ·
The caravan site was of a high standard and was
open from 1 March until 31 October every year ·
No objections had been received ·
There was no intention to increase the size of the
site - only the number of caravans from five to nine ·
The increase was in response to the demand in the
number of enquires ·
The increase responded to the demand (given that
the number of touring caravans parking illegally was increasing) · The touring visitors contributed to ... view the full minutes text for item 5.2 |
|
Application No C17/0487/30/LL - Fferm Methlem, Rhydlios, Pwllheli PDF 172 KB Creation of touring caravan site for 6 pitches, landscaping, construction of toilet/shower block and treatment plant LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor W Gareth Roberts Link
to relevant background documents Additional documents: Minutes: Create
a touring caravan site with six plots along with landscaping, construction of
toilet/shower block and installation of septic tank. Attention
was drawn to the late observations that had been received and a request by the
applicant to defer discussing the application. The Planning Manager noted that
adequate reasons had not been submitted to defer. As a result, deferring this
discussion would not make a difference to the recommendation as there were
fundamental concerns in terms of policy and visual impact on the AONB. (a)
The Planning Manager elaborated on the background
of the application, and noted that this was an application to establish a
touring caravan site for six units in a field at Methlem, Rhoshirwaun. The proposal also involved building a toilet block
to the rear of the existing workshop, along with installing a sewage treatment
system and undertaking an element of landscaping to enhance existing hedges. It was also highlighted that this was a site in open
countryside which abutted the Whistling Sands class three county road and was
also located within an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and a Landscape of
Outstanding Historical Interest. It was
intended to use a vehicular access that currently served as an access to the
workshop and the yard as an entrance to the site. It was explained that the site was of a limited size and
it was questioned if it was possible to ensure a layout of a high standard.
There was insufficient space for the number of units proposed when considering
parking and awning tents. It was noted that the current landscaping was
insufficient with open fields beyond the site. Reference was made to the policy
which stated that new sites should not be intrusive to the landscape. It was
considered that the site was prominent in the landscape as it was, with the
number of vehicles, machinery and equipment within the yard visibly attracting
attention and standing out. Approving a caravan site on this site would add to
the prominence of the site and would detract from views within the AONB, which
were very conspicuous from the direction of the road near Whistling Sands and
also when travelling towards Methlem from the direction of Rhydlios. The
proposal would not contribute positively to the broader landscape of the AONB
and therefore the proposal did not meet the requirements of policy AMG1 of the
LDP. b)
It was highlighted that the Local Member had
submitted written observations objecting to the application. c)
It was proposed and seconded to refuse the
application. RESOLVED to refuse the application 1. The proposed caravan site, due to its location, setting and appearance in the landscape, would stand out as a prominent and intrusive feature in open countryside and would have a detrimental impact on the landscape and on the visual amenities of the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The proposal is therefore contrary to policy AMG 1 and TWR 5 The Gwynedd and Anglesey Joint Local Development Plan (July 2017) (as amended by ... view the full minutes text for item 5.3 |
|
Application No C17/0494/39/LL - 16, Lon Cernyw, Bwlchtocyn, Pwllheli PDF 157 KB Extension and internal alterations LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor John Brynmor Hughes Link
to relevant background documents Additional documents: Minutes: Extension and
internal alterations a)
The Development Control Manager elaborated on the
background of the application, noting that this was an application for
alterations to the existing house that entailed the construction of an
extension and raising the height of the roof in order to use the roof-space for
additional rooms. It was noted that the intention was
to construct an extension on the gable-end to comprise a garage and a
multi-purpose room on the ground floor with a bedroom on the first floor; build
an extension at the front of the property to create a front-lean-to ridge roof
extension and finish the development's roof with slates, and the external
rendered walls would be painted to match the existing property. Attention was drawn to the fact that the property was
within a residential area outside the development boundary of Bwlchtocyn and
within the AONB and Landscape of Outstanding Historical Interest. It was
considered that the proposal's location would not have a significant additional
detrimental impact on the area's visual amenities or impair the AONB. It was highlighted that objections had been received from
neighbours on the grounds of issues such as loss of natural light, impact of
external lighting, design and overlooking. However, when considering the size
and design of the development, it was not considered that the proposal's impact
on the amenities of nearby properties would not be significant enough for the
application to be refused on the grounds of these matters. It was reiterated that the proposal was acceptable in terms of issues
such as road safety and biodiversity. b)
Taking advantage of the right to speak, the
applicant’s agent noted the following points: ·
That the applicant had received advice from the
Planning Service ·
The concerns expressed in the objections had been
considered ·
That it was intended for opaque glass to be
installed in the overlooking windows ·
An extension would be a suitable and purposeful
addition ·
It would not set a precedent due to its setting and
relationship with the other houses in the estate c)
The Local Member noted his support to the
application and noted the following main points: ·
That the plans had been adapted in response to the
objections ·
There was a need to ensure that the applicant kept
to condition regarding rooflights ·
That the neighbours were happy with the adaptations ch) It was proposed and seconded to approve the
application. d)
During
the ensuing discussion, the following points were highlighted by individual
Members: ·
Concern that this could set a precedent for other
houses in the area ·
Adapting houses to make them bigger made them out
of reach of the local market price Resolved: To
approve the application subject to the conditions 1. Commencement
within five years. 2. In
accordance with the plans. 3. Slates
of the roof to match. 4. Exterior
walls to be of white coloured render. 5. Roof lights in the roof on the western elevation (rear) to be at least 1.8 metres above floor level. |
|
Application No C17/0567/17/LL - Ty Newydd, Bethesda Bach, Caernarfon PDF 256 KB Application to demolish existing
dwelling and erection of new dwelling in it's place LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Eric M Jones Link
to relevant background information Additional documents: Minutes: Application
to demolish the existing dwelling and construct a new dwelling in its place The Members had visited the site. Attention was drawn to the
additional observations submitted. (a)
The
Planning Manager elaborated on the background of the application, and noted
that this was an application to demolish the existing dwelling and construct a
new dwelling in its place, erect a garage/storage shed on the existing site
along with changes to the existing vehicular access to the site and extending
the property's existing curtilage. It was
noted that there had been informal prior discussions about the proposal to
demolish and rebuild the house; and, although the discussions were informal,
and the policies of the Unitary Development Plan were no longer relevant, clear
guidance had been given on how to overcome the oppressive impact and impact on
the amenities of the nearby property and the basic planning principles were
equally relevant here in considering the application in the context of the
policies of the Joint Local Development Plan. It was therefore considered that
the proposal was contrary to the following criteria of policy TAI 13: Attention was drawn to Criterion
number 4: Outside development boundaries, it is impossible to retain the
existing building through renovating it or extending it and/or it is possible
to demonstrate that repairing the existing building is not economically
practical - that priority was given to renovating buildings before constructing
new houses; but, the Local Planning Authority accepted that there were
occasions where that was not possible. To this end, this application did not
contain any evidence that it was not possible to repair the existing building
practically in economic terms. Criterion
6: Outside the Coastal Change Management Area, a house to be built must be
located on the same footprint as the existing building unless relocating within
the curtilage can be shown to reduce its visual impact and its impact on local
amenities - Although the proposed house had been set back in order to reduce its
impact on the property that stands directly in front of it; contrary to the pre
application advice given, the proposed house has been rotated so that the rear
(with large openings and main rooms e.g. large living room, kitchen and
bedrooms) fac the adjacent building below, and the front of the proposed house
contains the secondary rooms (e.g. bathrooms, office and changing room) and
face open agricultural land. It was therefore considered that neither the
location nor the setting of the proposed house attempted to mitigate its impact
on local amenities, specifically the existing amenities of the nearby property. It is considered that the height of the eaves were excessive and therefore created a disproportionate design in terms of the surface area of the wall in relation to the roof. This meant that this design created a design structure that would not be in keeping with its setting on a hill in open landscape, and would lead to a substantially greater visual impact than the existing building. It was ... view the full minutes text for item 5.5 |