Venue: Cyfarfod Rhithiol / Virtual Meeting. View directions
Contact: Lowri Haf Evans 01286 679878
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES To receive
any apologies for absence Minutes: Apologies were received from John Pughe Roberts and John Brynmor Hughes |
|
DECLARATION OF PERSONAL INTEREST To receive
any declaration of personal interest Minutes: None to note |
|
URGENT ITEMS To note any
items which are urgent business in the opinion of the Chairman so that they may
be considered Minutes: None to note |
|
The
Chairman shall propose that the minutes of the meeting of this committee held
on 16th of September 2024 to be signed as a true record Minutes: The Chair accepted the
minutes of the meeting held on 16 September 2024 as a true record. |
|
WALES PENSION PARTNERSHIP UPDATE To receive and note
the information.
Additional documents:
Decision: DECISION: To accept and note
the information Minutes: The Investment Manager highlighted that this was now a
regular report that noted the latest information on the WPP's work. She drew
attention to discussions at the September 2024 meeting of the Joint Committee
which included information about the pooled budgets (Gwynedd was second highest
with 85% pooled), the standard business plan and the risk register. She referred to the Operator's update for the period
and the market conditions that they were monitoring. It was reported that the
funds' performance had varied, with the equity funds performing strongly while
the fixed income funds had lagged over the quarter in question. She noted that
the funds were long-term investments and that officers, together with Hymans
Robertson advisers, assessed the performances over 3-month, 12 month and 3-year
periods. She added that Russell Investments, the Investments
Manager also assessed the managers continually and would reduce, increase or
eliminate payments to try to enhance the long-term performance of the sub-funds
– she referred to an example of work that was currently being undertaken with
the Global Growth sub-fund, which had underspent historically. She reported
that Russell Investments had provided an update on the new Private Credit fund,
with the Gwynedd Pension Fund having invested £29m in the fund with the aim of
increasing this amount substantially over time. Attention was drawn to two procurement exercises that
had taken place recently (for an Oversight Advisor and a Voting and Engagement
Service Provider). She noted that interviews had been conducted, and they
intended to present a recommendation to the next joint-committee meeting. In the context of the 'Call for Evidence' consultation
where the Westminster Government was reviewing the pension schemes of the LGPS,
the Manager highlighted the response of the Gwynedd Pension Fund. It was
reported that the situation had now changed following the Chancellor of the
Exchequer's Mansion House speech, and a further consultation had been announced
calling for evidence, which was a rough indication of the route that the
Westminster Government expected the LGPS to take. She reported that the new
consultation looked at areas such as asset pooling, local and UK investment,
and Governance – there were 30 questions to respond to by 16 January 2025. The main messages of the consultation were that there
was no change to local funds, such as the Gwynedd Pension Fund, but there was a
requirement to consider merging funds, although not mandatory. She noted that
there would be expected changes to the pools, such as the Wales Pensions
Partnership in respect of Gwynedd, with the requirement for them to be
registered with the FCA (Financial Conduct Authority), to have the capability
to provide advice to the local funds, the requirement for strategic asset allocation
to sit with the pool rather than at a local level as is currently did, the
requirement for 100% of assets to be pooled, and to report continuously in the
Annual Report on local schemes. It was added that the requirement to be registered with the FCA was significant which would mean ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |
|
DEFINED BENEFIT STRATEGIC INVESTMENT FORUM The Committee is requested
to consider and receive the
information Additional documents: Decision: DECISION To accept and note
the information Minutes: Feedback and information was presented by Cllr Goronwy
Edwards The Investment Forum had been held in Loch
Lomond, September 2024 and Cllr Goronwy Edwards and Cllr John Brynmor had
attended the forum. He noted that the conference had been beneficial and was
well-timed, bearing in mind the Westminster Government's Pensions Review (Call
for Evidence). The members gave thanks for the feedback. DECISION To accept and note the information |
|
EXCLUDE PRESS AND PUBLIC The Chairman shall propose that the press and public be excluded from the meeting during the discussion on the following item due to the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 12, Part 4, Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972. There
is an acknowledged public interest in openness in
relation to the use of public resources and related financial issues. It is also acknowledged that there are occasions,
in order to protect the financial interests of public authorities that matters related to commercial information need to be discussed without being publicised.
Publication of such commercially sensitive information would be inappropriate having regard to the legitimate interests of third parties and could undermine confidence to engage with the Council and therefore the Councils ability make decisions on behalf of the fund. This would
be contrary to the wider public interest of securing value for money and the best overall outcome
and for those reasons the matter should be exempt in the public interest. Minutes: RESOLVED to exclude the press and public from the
meeting during the discussion on the following items due to the likely
disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 14, Schedule 12A of
the Local Government Act 1972 – Information about the financial or business
transactions of any specific person (including the authority that retains that
information). There was an acknowledged public interest in being
open about the use of public resources and related financial issues. However,
it was also acknowledged that there were occasions, in order to protect public
financial interests, where commercial information must be discussed without
being publicised. The reports related
specifically to a proposed procurement process.
Publicising such commercially sensitive information could be detrimental
to the interests of the Council and its partners by undermining
competition. This would be contrary to
the wider public interest of securing the best overall outcome. For these
reasons, the matter was closed in the public interest. |
|
ROBECO ENGAGEMENT SERVICE- ENGAGEMENT REPORT 01.04.2024 - 30.06.2024 To consider the report (copy for Members only). Decision: DECISION To accept and note
the information Minutes: A quarterly report was submitted summarising the work
that Robeco (WPP Voting and Engagement Provider) undertook on behalf of the
Pension Fund, including the engagement work. The contents of the report were discussed, and
concerns were again raised by Members about the standard of the company's
engagement and consultation work. They noted that while there were a number of
positives in their work, there were also major negative elements, therefore
going forward there was a need to ensure more information about developments
and how they were measured. It was reiterated that the company appeared 'quiet'
– need to see more sharing of opinion and guidance; the company needed to evidence
effectiveness and set context. In response it was noted that the WPP, when drawing up
future contracts, wanted to ensure that there was a proactive element as part
of the engagement responsibilities, along with the requirements of presenting
clear and understandable information. It was noted that the WPP needed to
review arrangements for responding to the information presented by the Voting
and Engagement Provider in order to optimise the relationship. Further observations arising from the ensuing
discussion: ·
Biodiversity issues need to
be considered as well as climate issues. ·
The situation needed to be
monitored, ensuring that the company kept to their word. ·
A need to ensure next steps
for matters that appeared as ‘closed non-effective’. How could discussions
be re-opened / these issues be revisited? ·
There was a procedure in
place to follow up matters. RESOLVED to
accept and note the information |