Venue: Cyfarfod Rhithiol / Virtual Meeting. View directions
Contact: Ffion Elain Evans Email: ffionelainevans@gwynedd.llyw.cymru
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES To receive any apologies for absence. Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillor Stephen Churchman and Councillor
Arwyn Herald Roberts. |
|
DECLARATION OF PERSONAL INTEREST To receive any declaration of personal interest. Minutes: No declarations
of personal interest were received. |
|
URGENT ITEMS To note any items that are a matter of urgency in the view of the Chairman for consideration. Minutes: No urgent
matters were raised. |
|
The
Chairman shall propose that the minutes of the last meeting of this committee
held on the 15th of June 2023 be signed as a true record. Minutes: The Chair signed the minutes of the previous meeting, held on 15 June
2023, as a true record. |
|
THE INDEPENDENT REMUNERATION PANEL FOR WALES' DRAFT REPORT PDF 158 KB To ask the Committee
for their observations in order to respond to The Independent Remuneration
Panel’s draft report consultation. Additional documents: Decision: To accept
the report and present the committee’s observations in order to respond to The
Independent Remuneration Panel for Wales’ draft
report. Minutes: The Democracy and Language Services Manager presented the report by
explaining that the panel were the ones responsible for setting the financial remuneration
level for councillors. It was noted that their role was completely independent
and that they published a report annually in October to outline the proposal
for the subsequent financial year. For the 2024/25 financial year, it was
explained that the panel had not suggested any significant changes but that
they proposed increasing the basic allowance offered to Councillors and that it
would be payable from April 2024 onwards. There would be an increase in the sum
offered to the Councillors who received senior salaries as well. It was explained that the other main change was that the panel addressed
matters relating to payments for co-opted members. It was explained that the
current arrangements noted that co-opted members should receive financial
remuneration based on a full-day or half-day.
But due to changes to work practices, such as more frequent on-line
briefing meetings etc., it was explained that the panel considered offering
flexibility when paying co-opted members, including hourly rate payments. The Democracy and
Language Service Manager explained that six questions were included in the
consultation and asked whether it would be possible for the committee to
provide comments on the different aspects per question in
order to use the comments to prepare a response to the panel's
consultation. ·
Question 1: Balance between affordability and sufficient financial
remuneration for representatives? o
It was noted that the panel’s proposals seemed affordable enough
compared to the Council's budget as a whole and therefore seemed fair enough. ·
Question 2: Opinion on the flexibility of payments to Co-opted Members? o
The Members agreed that the reasoning behind the change to the way
Co-opted Members were paid made sense considering the change to the work
circumstances and that it happened in a more fragmented and consistent way by
now. o
The system's flexibility and the way that it could be changed when new
circumstances arose was praised. ·
Question 3: Good practice in terms of using the Panel's powers to
encourage more sustainable travel amongst Members? o
It was noted that the option of hybrid working had now led to more
sustainable working and that providing Councillors with the choice was a good
way forward. o
Questions were asked relating to the situation regarding insurance if
sharing a car with another Councillor to attend meetings. In response, it was confirmed that there
would need to change the insurance to a policy that covered business trips to
be able to use it by virtue of the post. o
Attention was drawn
to the fact that travelling costs were significantly higher if one did ward
work when living in a rural ward compared to an urban ward and that no
recognition was given to that issue. ·
Question 4: Awareness of the Councillors' rights for reimbursements and
the steps to improve that. o The Democracy and Language Services Manager noted that information regarding the Councillor's rights was available ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |
|
PRIORITIES OF THE HEAD OF DEMOCRACY SERVICES - UPDATE PDF 154 KB To submit
the report of the Head of Democracy Services. Decision: To accept
the report and the information contained therein. Minutes: The Head of Democracy Services presented the report,
reminding the committee that there were four priority fields outlined to receive
attention during 2023/24 namely safety and support for Councillors; personal
development discussions; review of scrutiny arrangements and a paperless
Council. In terms of the
safety and councillor support aspect, it was explained that information
regarding health and well-being matters would be provided on the Members'
Intranet and regular updates were given on the field in the Members'
Bulletin. It was noted that not many
Councillors were aware of the bulletin and that it would be useful to have the
committee members' opinion on how to ensure better use of the Members' Intranet
and weekly bulletin to communicate important key information. It was explained that every member had received an
invitation to take advantage of a Consultation Session which was an informal
discussion with a specialist from the Learning and Development field to discuss
their role as a member. It was noted that up until now they were rarely used
and so the members were reminded that they would have to contact the Members Development
Officer to arrange a session. In the context of the shift to become a paperless Council,
it was explained that there had been developments over the summer. Recognition was given to the fact that it had
not been an easy shift and the members were thanked for their cooperation on
the matter. The members were reminded
that it would be possible for them to get in touch if they needed an additional
screen or to arrange a 1:1 training slot to understand the equipment. In terms of other developments, it was explained that
changes were made to the sound system in Siambr Hywel
Dda following observations from the Councillors. An
overview of the training opportunities given to members was given also. Matters raised during the discussion: -
The department was
thanked for the support. -
Regarding the shift to
become a paperless Council, appreciation was expressed of the fact that the
department had held individual discussion with those who continued to receive
paper copies. -
Attention was drawn to
the fact that there were reception problems in some rural areas in Gwynedd and
that it could be problematic when trying to read documents on-line. -
It was noted that the
safety and support to Councillors was important and that being proactive was
necessary when ensuring priority for the field. The Head of Democracy Services
confirmed that the matter would be a priority area for quite some time. -
Astonishment was
expressed regarding the low number of members who attended training and it was
questioned whether the training provide covered what Councillors needed? o
In response, it was
noted that that the department understood that the Councillors’ time was in
demand but that they were encouraged to attend the training sessions. o Attention was drawn to the fact that one of the Council's new priorities was increasing the Council's diversity and that meant more Councillors had other ... view the full minutes text for item 6. |
|
SUPPORT FRAMEWORK FOR MEMBERS PDF 65 KB To consider
the report. Additional documents:
Decision: To accept
the report and the information contained therein. Minutes: The report was presented by explaining that ensuring support for
Councillors had been key in Cyngor Gwynedd for quite a while. With the support
of Welsh Local Government Association (WLGA), the Council collaborated and compared
with other local authorities, learning and benefiting from their experiences.
It was explained that by now, the WLGA had developed a voluntary
Self-assessment Framework that offered different areas for the Councils to
concentrate on to self-evaluate their performance. It was noted that an
advisory document had been developed by the association and that Cyngor Gwynedd
had ensured opportunity to present observations in response to the advisory
document. It was explained that
Cyngor Gwynedd were eager to plan to proceed with the work following the
approval of the final framework. It was recommended that a small group of the
Democracy Services Committee's members met to assess the following from the
final framework: ·
Is the Council
responsible for the field or not? ·
The Council's
current performance against the framework's expectations. ·
Is it a priority of
the Council? ·
Are there any potential improvement steps? It was explained that the above steps could be used to create a work
programme of improvements by using the framework as grounds to identify matters
to prioritise. It was noted that it
would be an effective starting point, but it was emphasised that the framework
must be used wisely whilst considering the resources available to the Council. Matters raised during the discussion: - ·
In terms of creating a small group, it was explained that the Democracy
and Language Service Manager would contact the representatives as soon as
possible after the framework would be finalised. ·
It was proposed that Councillors Dewi Owen, Beca Roberts, Anne
Lloyd-Jones and Cai Larsen would form the group. RESOLVED to accept the report and the information. |