Venue: Hybrid - Siambr Dafydd Orwig, Council Offices, Caernarfon LL55 1SH and Virtually via Zoom. View directions
Contact: Eirian Roberts 01286 679018
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES To receive any apologies for absence. Additional documents: Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillor Gwynfor Owen. |
|
DECLARATION OF PERSONAL INTEREST To receive any declarations of personal interest. Additional documents: Minutes: No
declarations of personal interest were received. |
|
URGENT BUSINESS To note any items that are a matter of urgency in the view of the Chair
for consideration. Additional documents: Minutes: None to note. |
|
The Chair shall propose that the minutes of the previous
meeting of this committee held on 12/12/24 be signed as a true record. Additional documents: Minutes: The Chair
signed the minutes of the previous meeting of this committee held on 12
December, 2024 as a true record. |
|
GWYNEDD ECONOMY PLAN To report on
work to-date in developing a new Economy Plan for Gwynedd, inviting the input of Members on the content of this report and
on any additional
issues they believe are important
in shaping the Plan. Additional documents: Decision: DECISION 1. To accept the
report and note the observations. 2. That the Committee
scrutinises the Draft Gwynedd Economy Plan when timely during 2025/26. Minutes: The
Cabinet Member for Economy and Community was welcomed to his first meeting of
the scrutiny committee and was congratulated on his appointment. The Head of the Economy and Community
Department and the officers were also welcomed to the meeting. Submitted
– a report by the Cabinet Member inviting input from the members on the
contents and on further issues they believed should be considered in compiling
the Gwynedd Economy Plan. The
Cabinet Member noted at the outset that this item followed on from the
discussion at the scrutiny committee meeting on 25 January 2024 regarding the
implementation of the Gwynedd Economy Development Project. In
response to the Chair's comments at the start of the meeting, the Head of
Economy and Community Department explained:- That
it was fair to say, when the report was presented last year, that they had
expected to be in a considerably different position by now. The
hope last autumn, when there had been a discussion in the Leadership Team, was
that there would now be a completed document ready to be printed. This had not
happened, although much work had taken place. They
needed to go back to the Leadership Team, and she believed that it was
beneficial to have this committee's input today to the principles and direction
so that the document that would be submitted to the Leadership Team
incorporated the scrutineers' observations. A
draft of the finished document was not ready today since the Department had
re-scheduled the work since the autumn. That had happened for several reasons,
which included starting again on setting a new direction in the wake of
appointing a new Cabinet Member, and re-planning work priorities to take
account of an additional year's worth of work in light of the UK Government's
decision to extend the Levelling Up Fund for an extra year. The
Cabinet Member set out the context for the report, noting the following:- The
UK Government's confirmation that the Levelling Up Fund would continue for a
further year to 2025/26 was to be welcomed, but we could be certain that the
financial landscape would change once again after April 2026. Consequently, the
requirement for this Council to consider its economic priorities remained. Securing
a document that clearly stated our aspirations would also be an important tool
in influencing discussions by the two governments within the North Wales
region. The
purpose of the report to hand was to summarise the messages received and to
obtain comments and feedback from the scrutineers before proceeding to finish
compiling the Economic Development Strategic Plan and adopting it in the new
financial year. The
members were given an opportunity to ask questions and offer observations. A member expressed their opinion that it was difficult to scrutinise a progress report – the members had hoped to scrutinise a draft version of the Gwynedd Economy Plan at this meeting. They noted that there could be no certainty whether there would be another opportunity for this committee to scrutinise the plan before it ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |
|
EDUCATION LANGUAGE POLICY – THE ENGAGEMENT PROCEDURE To present information on the engagement process in the context of the new Education Language Policy, and then
report on the findings of the engagement. Additional documents:
Decision: DECISION 1. To accept the
report and note the observations. 2. That the Committee
scrutinises the Draft Education Language Policy along with the Strategy to
support the implementation of the policy at the 10 April 2025 meeting. 3. Request a copy of
the relevant minutes of engagement meetings. 4. Invite members of
the Language Committee to attend the Committee meeting for the item. Minutes: The
Cabinet Member for Education reported that this report was being presented in
response to a request by the members of the Committee to receive a report on
the engagement process in the context of the new Education Language Policy. It
was noted that the report summarised the engagement procedure in relation to
the Education Language Policy. The
context was provided, noting that the Gwynedd local authority had the largest
number of Welsh speakers in Wales, and also had the highest percentage of young
people receiving their education through the medium of Welsh and bilingually.
The officer stated that linguistic changes in the county, as well as the Welsh
Government's influence on education in Wales, made it timely to review Cyngor
Gwynedd's Education Language Policy and discuss which elements worked well and
where any reforms or changes needed to be made. It
was explained that the Education Department had set out the procedure and the
process in the report. It was noted that a number of engagement sessions had
been held with primary, secondary and special schools in all parts of the
county, and in areas with varying percentages of Welsh speakers. An engagement
meeting had been held for representatives such as Cylch yr Iaith, Cymdeithas yr
Iaith, Dyfodol i'r Iaith and RHAG (Parents for Welsh Medium Education). It was
further noted that several members of this Committee, the Language Committee
and the Gwynedd Governors Forum had also been involved in the process. The
aim was to create a robust Language Policy that was suitable to circumstances
in Gwynedd, ensuring that it could be built upon and developed in the future.
It was noted that the true situation showed a slippage in the use of the Welsh
language by the county's young people. It was further noted that we needed to
prevent this and increase the use of the Welsh language. Meirion
Prys Jones (Adviser) reported that 29 conversations had taken place during the
engagement process in October, 2024 with a broad range of representatives from
the education field and with parents. He noted that, essentially, they had
asked 10 questions during the discussions, but participants had been free to
express an opinion on any matter relating to the Gwynedd Education Language
Policy and present recommendations for the future. He expressed that
constructive and positive feedback had been received from all participants,
especially from the pupils themselves. It
was noted that the main conclusions of the engagement were that the Language
Policy was working well and led to success. He noted that everyone supported
the Language Policy, although no-one had read it recently, leading to more of
an ethos and a feeling that a good Language Policy existed, but without
complete certainty of what it contained. He highlighted that this led to the Language Policy being interpreted and implemented differently between schools, especially among the secondary schools. He noted that there was a clear difference between the primary and secondary sectors, with the Policy being applied firmly in the primary ... view the full minutes text for item 6. |
|
IMMERSION EDUCATION SYSTEM To provide an update on the evaluation process in the context of the Evaluation of the Immersion System. Additional documents:
Decision: DECISION 1. To accept the
report and note the observations. 2. That the Committee
scrutinises the Immersion Education Programme Improvement Recommendations
Action Plan at the 10 April 2025 meeting. Minutes: The
Cabinet Member for Education provided the context. It was noted that the
Cabinet had decided at its meeting on 16 July 2021 that it was timely to
reorganise these centres and create a new Immersion Education System. It was
explained that the Committee had expressed a wish to scrutinise the new system
after it had been given time to become established. He explained that the
Education Department had decided to appoint a research team from Bangor
University to evaluate the Immersion Education System in Gwynedd. He elaborated that this team had conducted
visits and had spoken with stakeholders, and would report back soon with its
recommendations. A
member questioned how the three participants had been selected for the case
study, and what had been the criteria. In response, it was noted that the three
had been selected by the university. It was explained that this relied on
parental consent and that they had been selected at random, which was a
scientific method of selecting participants in case studies. It was elaborated
that the participants came from different immersion centres. A
member expressed interest in getting a copy of the equality impact assessment.
Concern was expressed regarding the slant and focus of the report and the
initial decision to cut from five immersion days to four. It was noted that the
focus, without exception, was on the individuals going through the immersion
system, with no mention of consultation with parents, other learners in the
school, or wider society or elected members. It was expressed that the
decision, the report, and the proposed research were thoroughly neo-liberal in
their ideology. It
was explained, in response, that this research specifically looked at the
implications for children going through the immersion system, but the point
regarding the impact on schools was accepted, and conversations had been
conducted with headteachers regarding this matter. Attention was drawn to the fact that
the Education Department was prepared to strengthen or change the arrangements
in response to recommendations, but they were waiting to see what the report
stated before drawing any conclusions. The officer underlined that no effort
had been made to conceal anything, and in terms of considering reports that had
been produced over time, they were more than prepared to see what the impact
had been. They noted that the point regarding equality implications was accepted,
and that its scope was possibly greater than expected in standard reports. In
response to what was said, a member expressed that research would be expected
before making the decision to reduce the number of immersion education days.
From a lay person's perspective, it was noted that this appeared to be a
financial decision. It was noted that, considering the decision to revamp the immersion centres had been made in order to provide high-quality provision, the number of teachers had been reduced from two per centre to one teacher and one assistant, and the number of centres had been decreased, with the immersion period changed from five days to ... view the full minutes text for item 7. |
|
SAFEGUARDING ARRANGEMENTS IN SCHOOLS SCRUTINY INVESTIGATION BRIEF To adopt the investigation’s
brief and to elect members. Additional documents:
Decision: DECISION 1.
To adopt the brief. 2.
To elect
the following members to undertake the work of the investigation: -
The Councillors Dawn Lynne
Jones, Cai Larsen, Gwynfor Owen, John Pughe Roberts and Dyfrig Siencyn -
Co-opted Member - Sharon Roberts
(Arfon Parent/Governor Representative) -
Additional reserve name - Councillor
Richard Glyn Roberts Minutes: It
was noted that safeguarding arrangements in schools had been scrutinised at the
Committee's meeting on 18 July 2024. There was an informal discussion after the
meeting regarding the possibility of holding a Task and Finish Group or a
Scrutiny Investigation into the area. It was concluded that a further
discussion should be held at the informal meeting of the Committee on 5
September 2024. Concern had been expressed by the members present about the
implementation of the safeguarding arrangements within our schools. A draft
brief for the scrutiny investigation was considered at the Committee's informal
meeting on 9 January 2025. It
was noted that the main question that the investigation would address is:
"Are safeguarding arrangements in county schools appropriate and
implemented consistently?". It was noted that the investigation intended
to consider the authority's current arrangements in relation to safeguarding in
schools, as well as arrangements in a sample of schools. At
the informal meeting of the Committee on 9 January 2025, the members were
invited to express an interest in becoming members of the investigation. It was
concluded that an e-mail should be sent to all members of the Committee to ask
them to state which school governing bodies they were members of. The email
stressed that members would be required to ensure they had completed the
"Child and Adult Safeguarding Training" to be part of the
investigation. It
was noted that a maximum of five members may be involved in the investigation
and, in accordance with the Council's Constitution, the membership was required
to include representation of no less than two different political groups. It
was discussed that, given that this was an education issue, it would be
appropriate to include one co-opted member with a vote on education issues
only. RESOLVED 1.
To adopt the brief. 2.
To elect the following members to undertake the work of the investigation: - Councillors Dawn
Lynne Jones, Cai Larsen, Gwynfor Owen, John Pughe Roberts and Dyfrig Siencyn - Co-opted Member –
Sharon Roberts (Arfon Parent/Governor Representative) - Reserve member –
Councillor Richard Glyn Roberts |