Venue: Siambr Hywel Dda, Swyddfeydd y Cyngor Caernarfon ac yn rhithiol drwy Zoom. View directions
Contact: Jasmine Jones 01286 679667
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
APOLOGIES To receive any apologies for absence. Additional documents: Minutes: Apologies
were received from Councillor Dyfrig Siencyn. |
|
|
DECLARATION OF PERSONAL INTEREST To receive any declarations of personal interest. Additional documents: Minutes: None to note. |
|
|
URGENT BUSINESS To note any items that are a matter of urgency in the view of the Chair
for consideration. Additional documents: Minutes: None to
note. |
|
|
RESPONSE PLAN TO THE OUR BRAVERY BROUGHT JUSTICE REPORT Assurance
as to the implementation of the Response Plan. Additional documents:
Decision: DECISION 1.
Accept and note the report and work programme, and
request an update in 6 months. 2.
Recommend to the Cabinet: Work
Stream 1: Voice of the Child and Supporting Victims ·
Measurable
arrangements should be established that clearly show how the child's voice and
victims' experience directly influence decisions and outcomes; ·
Long-term
support for victims needs to be ensured without causing further trauma; ·
Children
facing challenges need to be given appropriate attention and unconscious bias
should be avoided; ·
Relevant
information should be easy to read and accessible to children. Work
Stream 2: Managing Allegations and Concerns About Adults Working with Children ·
The
arrangements for managing allegations and concerns should ensure that any doubt
about the suitability of adults to work with children and vulnerable adults is
assessed at an early stage, is appropriately escalated and independently
challenged, regardless of the status of the practitioner; ·
Clear
safeguards are needed for individuals who raise concerns; ·
Incidents
that do not directly relate to children need to be examined; ·
Evidence
should be gathered to show that change is taking place and to enable future
scrutiny; ·
Consideration
should be given to extending the time period for the audit in Part 5, Wales
Safeguarding Procedures, by more than two years; ·
It
should be checked that there is a mechanism in place to ensure, if necessary,
that there is a transition from human resources processes to Part 5 procedures. Work
Stream 3: Training and Policies ·
Policies
and training should be rigorous and reviewed to support professional judgement
and challenge; ·
There
needs to be evidence that training changes behaviour and decisions in practice,
and is not solely a matter of attendance; ·
Safeguarding
records should be regularly reviewed and supervised by a specific officer to
ensure that they are in accordance with the requirements; ·
'Grooming'
should be specifically identified in the training arrangements, and given
timely attention. Work Stream 4: School Governance ·
School
governance arrangements should be strengthened to identify patterns of risk
over time, to ensure clear pathways of escalation, and include an element of
independent challenge or assurance; ·
Appropriate
support should be offered to equip governors to appropriately challenge and
identify patterns; ·
Consideration
should be given to the training provided for Chairs and Designated Safeguarding
Governors. Work
Stream 5: Reasonable Force ·
It
should be ensured that staff understand when the use of reasonable force is
appropriate, and that they feel confident and supported to take action to
protect children; ·
It
should be ensured that reviews focus on learning lessons rather than blaming. Work
Stream 6: Crisis Planning and Crisis Response ·
Crisis
planning and response should be treated as a living process that is part of the
safeguarding process and should be tested regularly; ·
Clarity
is required in relation to roles; ·
Effective
communication with staff should be ensured; ·
Arrangements
need to be continually reviewed to ensure that lessons learned from Ysgol
Friars remain operational over time. Work
Stream 7: Supporting and Stabilising Ysgol Friars · Supporting and stabilising Ysgol Friars should be used as a basis for whole-system ... view the full decision text for item 4. Minutes: The Council Leader presented the report and noted
that a sincere apology had already been offered to the victims and all those
affected by the heinous offences committed that had led to the Our Bravery
Brought Justice report, and it was emphasised that without definitive action
any apology was meaningless. It was emphasised that action was key to ensure
practical change and provide assurance that such failures would not happen
again. It was noted that children's voices had not been heard before, but that
children's experiences and voices were central to the Response Plan in moving
forward. It was noted that
scrutiny was an essential part of the democratic process, and that a
constructive challenge was essential on such a serious issue. It was confirmed
that the meeting was part of a series of scrutiny meetings, and that
discussions in the Care Scrutiny Committee and the Governance and Audit
Committee had resulted in practical recommendations and specific actions. It
was noted that several recommendations had already been implemented immediately
by officers to strengthen safeguarding arrangements. It was stressed that
transparency was essential to restore public confidence and staff confidence.
It was confirmed that the Response Plan was a live and public document, and the
minutes of the Response Plan Programme Board meetings would be published on the
Council's website to enable members and the public to see the progress being
made. It was acknowledged
that the subject was difficult to discuss and the report had been difficult to
read, and the Committee was thanked for scrutinising the matter in a sensitive
and professional manner. It was emphasised that safeguarding and protecting children
from harm was the Council's most important responsibility. It was noted that it
was positive that several members were scrutinising the Plan. Confidence was
expressed in the Response Plan and the cross-departmental work taking place to
improve safeguarding arrangements. Professor Sally Holland, Chair of the
Response Plan Programme Board, was thanked for her guidance. It was recognised
that the Response Plan did not currently include all responses as it was a live
document, and as such the input of the scrutiny committees was important. The Committee was
invited to submit constructive comments, suggestions and criticism to
strengthen the Response Plan before it was submitted to Cabinet for formal
adoption. It was noted that improving safeguarding arrangements depended on
information sharing, consistent working with partners and stakeholders, and
collaboration across services and political divides, and that this work could
not be carried out by one service, one department, one political group or one
person alone. It was noted that there was a willingness to return to the
Committee in due course to report on the progress of the Response Plan and to
conduct the dialogue. The Chief Executive noted that the meeting was another important step forward on a challenging path to restore confidence and achieve the goal of securing the best possible safeguarding arrangements. It was acknowledged that the topic was a difficult one, but that it was ... view the full minutes text for item 4. |