Venue: Cyfarfod Rhithiol / Virtual Meeting. View directions
Contact: Rhodri Jones 0186 679556
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
APOLOGIES To receive
any apologies for absence. Minutes: Apologies
were received from:- ·
Councillor
Hugh Jones (Wrexham County Borough Council) (Vice-Chair) ·
Iwan
Evans (Monitoring Officer) ·
Sian
Pugh (Assistant Head of Finance) |
|
|
DECLARATION OF PERSONAL INTEREST To receive
any declarations of personal interest. Minutes: There were
no declarations of personal interest. |
|
|
URGENT BUSINESS To note any
items that are a matter of urgency in the view of the Chair for consideration. Minutes: No urgent
matters were raised. |
|
|
MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING The Chair
shall propose that the minutes of the meeting held 06/05/25 be signed as a true
record. Minutes: The Chair
signed the minutes of the previous meeting held on 6 May 2025 as a true record. |
|
|
THE STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN DELIVERY AGREEMENT The Chief
Executive and the Regional Strategic Planning Officer to present the report. Additional documents: Decision: To recommend to the Corporate Joint Committee
that it is ready to approve the draft Delivery Agreement following consultation
and submit it to the Welsh Government, subject to the SDP funding decision. Minutes: The report
was submitted by the Regional Strategic Development Planning Officer. RESOLVED To recommend to the Corporate Joint Committee
that it is ready to approve the draft Delivery Agreement following consultation
and submit it to the Welsh Government, subject to the SDP funding decision. REASONS FOR THE DECISION The
Strategic Planning Sub-Committee is responsible for preparing the draft
Delivery Agreement. The sub-committee has co-ordination and planning functions
relating to each step towards delivering the SDP. DISCUSSION Members
were reminded that they had approved to hold a public consultation on the
Strategic Development Plan Delivery Agreement in draft form for a six-week
period, at an informal meeting of this Sub-committee held on 27 June 2025. It
was updated that the public consultation had now concluded confirming that this
report presented the feedback and responses received from the public and
stakeholders. It was
reported that the Strategic Development Plan Delivery Plan had been approved by
the Corporate Joint Committee at its meeting on 18 July 2025 and that the
responses received as part of the consultation contributed to an update of that
document. It was
noted that Officers had invited a large number of
stakeholders and partners to participate in the public consultation, in order
to ensure an open process. It was updated that 16 formal responses had been
received to the public consultation from a number of
organisations such as Local Authorities and specific officers within them, the
Welsh Language Commissioner, community groups and Heneb.
It was acknowledged that the number of responses that had been received was not
high, but it was assured that the comments received were of a high standard and
that this process was key to raising awareness of the Strategic Development
Plan as a whole. It was
noted that a revised version of the responses received as part of the public
consultation had been circulated to Members following the publication of the Agenda for this meeting. It was clarified that the
consultation had not ended when the documentation of this meeting was being published and a number of the responses had reached Officers
on the last day of the consultation. It was considered important that members
received all the information that had come to hand and therefore a revised
version of the responses was shared with Members, with the consent of the
Chair. It was
highlighted that the responses asked whether sufficient time had been earmarked
for consultative exercises. It was explained that the statutory requirements of
ensuring that public consultations were held for a six-week period were adhered
to in order to ensure legislative compliance. It was
also noted that the Joint Committee had powers to extend the periods of public
consultations if it wished to do so. It was
emphasised that a number of responses to the
consultation highlighted Welsh language considerations. They were thanked for
their comments and assured that the Welsh language received ongoing
consideration within the work of the Joint Committee. It was explained that a number of respondents had ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |
|
|
The Chief
Executive and the Regional Strategic Planning Officer to present the report. Additional documents: Decision: To
approve the funding issues and options set out in the attached briefing note
and to recommend that the Corporate Joint Committee considers all options for
funding the SDP, including making further representations to the Welsh
Government. The officers were asked to revise the wording of the Report to
highlight budgetary expectations between the Government and the CJC and
encourage a steady financial contribution from the Government in order to avoid
the need for temporary grants when setting the long-term budget. Minutes: The report
was submitted by the Regional Strategic Development Planning Officer. RESOLVED To
approve the funding issues and options set out in the attached briefing note
and to recommend that the Corporate Joint Committee considers all options for
funding the SDP, including making further representations to the Welsh
Government. The officers were asked to revise the wording of the Report to
highlight budgetary expectations between the Government and the CJC and
encourage a steady financial contribution from the Government in order to avoid the need for temporary grants when setting
the long-term budget. REASONS FOR THE DECISION Ensure that
the Strategic Planning Sub-Committee is fully aware of the funding issues and
options relating to the SDP to inform their recommendations to the CJC. DISCUSSION It was
explained that the report highlighted options relating to funding the
production of the Strategic Development Plan, prior to the preparation of
budgets for the autumn term. A group of North Wales'
chief planning officers were thanked for their work in investigating various
financial issues associated with the Plan. It was noted that further
consideration could be given to the financial issues that had been prepared by
Officers to date, as Members had approved the submission of a draft version of
the Strategic Development Plan to the Corporate Joint Committee earlier during
this meeting. Members
were reminded that the Corporate Joint Committee had a legal duty by statute to
develop a Strategic Development Plan as well as its funding. It was noted that
officers had received a number of comments considering
whether the Welsh Government should fund the Plan and the process of setting it
up but in response, it was confirmed that no long-term plan had been submitted
by the Government for the funding making it a requirement for the Joint Committee
to comply with the statutory requirements. Although no
long-term budget had been earmarked by the Welsh Government, it was reported
that they had identified a budget of approximately £400,000 which applied to
all Welsh Corporate Joint Committees. It was noted that this funding would not
be shared equally between the Joint Committees, , it
would be allocated in accordance with the performance of the Joint Committees
to develop their Delivery Plan for approval. It was explained that the North
Wales Corporate Joint Committee was keen to ensure that progress was made on
the Strategic Development Plan Delivery Plan during this financial year to be
able to attract this funding to contribute to the funding of the Plan. It was
estimated that approximately £100,000 of this funding could be applied for
following the 19 September 2025 meeting of the Corporate Joint Committee, if
members approved the draft Delivery Plan. It was explained that if an
additional financial commitment to contribute to the Plan's budget could be
confirmed within the current financial year, it would be possible to apply for
an additional £200,000 of this grant funding offered by the Welsh Government. Pride was expressed that the Joint Committee's budgeting work had been ... view the full minutes text for item 6. |