• Calendar
  • Committees
  • Community Councils
  • Consultations
  • Decisions
  • Election results
  • ePetitions
  • Forthcoming Decisions
  • Forward Plans
  • Library
  • Meetings
  • Outside bodies
  • Search documents
  • Subscribe to updates
  • Your councillors
  • Your MPs
  • Your MEPs
  • What's new
  • Agenda, decisions and minutes

    Planning Committee - Monday, 12th July, 2021 11.00 am

    • Attendance details
    • Agenda frontsheet PDF 312 KB
    • Agenda reports pack PDF 27 MB
    • Printed decisions PDF 274 KB
    • Printed minutes PDF 402 KB

    Venue: Cyfarfod Rhithiol / Virtual Meeting. View directions

    Contact: Lowri Haf Evans 

    Media

     
    Items
    No. Item

    1.

    APOLOGIES

    To accept any apologies for absence.

    Additional documents:

    • Webcast for 1.

    Minutes:

    Apologies were received from Councillors Louise Hughes, Eric M Jones and Huw Wyn Jones. 

     

    Best wishes for a speedy recovery were sent to Councillor Eric M Jones who had recently undergone surgery.

     

    Cara Owen (Planning Manager) was congratulated on her appointment as a Project Manager in the Housing and Property Service. She was thanked for her advice and support to the Planning Committee over the years and best wishes were relayed to her in her new post.

     

    2.

    DECLARATION OF PERSONAL INTEREST AND PROTOCOL MATTERS

    To receive any declaration of personal interest and to note protocol matters.

    Additional documents:

    • Webcast for 2.

    Minutes:

    a      Councillor Berwyn P Jones in item 5.2 on the agenda, (C20/1093/24/Ll) as he was a member of the Adra Board.

     

    Councillor Anne Lloyd Jones in item 5.6 on the agenda, (C20/0877/09/LL) as she was a neighbour and a friend of the applicant.

     

    The Members were of the view that it was a prejudicial interest, and they withdrew from the meeting during the discussion on the application.

     

    b      The following members declared that they were local members in relation to the items noted:

     

    ·         Councillor Judith Humphreys (not a member of this Planning Committee), in relation to item 5.1 on the agenda, (C21/0430/22/LL).

    ·         Councillor Owain Williams, (a member of this Planning Committee), in relation to item 5.3 on the agenda, (C21/0376/34/LL).

    ·         Councillor Mike Stevens (not a member of this Planning Committee), in relation to item 5.6 on the agenda, (C20/0877/09/LL).

    ·         Councillor Gareth T Jones (a member of this Planning Committee) in relation to item 5.7 on the agenda, (C21/0332/42/DA).

    ·         Councillor Gruffydd Williams (not a member of this Planning Committee), in relation to item 5.9 on the agenda, (C21/0368/42/DT).

     

    3.

    URGENT ITEMS

    To note any items that are a matter of urgency in the view of the Chairman for consideration.

    Additional documents:

    • Webcast for 3.

    Minutes:

    None to note

    4.

    MINUTES pdf icon PDF 283 KB

    The Chairman shall propose that the minutes of the previous meeting of this committee, held on, 21st June 2021, be signed as a true record.

    Additional documents:

    • Webcast for 4.

    Minutes:

    The Chair signed the minutes of the previous meeting of this committee, held on 21 June 2021, as a true record.

     

    5.

    PLANNING APPLICATIONS

    To submit the report of the Head of Environment Department.

    Additional documents:

    • Webcast for 5.

    Minutes:

    The Committee considered the following applications for development. Details of the applications were expanded upon and questions were answered in relation to the plans and policy aspects.

     

     

    6.

    Application No C21/0430/22/LL Land Adjacent to Oxton Villa Ffordd Haearn Bach, Penygroes, LL54 6NY pdf icon PDF 244 KB

    Application for the erection of one affordable dwelling with associated access, parking and landscaping

     

    LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Judith Humphreys

     

    Link to relevant background documents

    Additional documents:

    • Plans , item 6. pdf icon PDF 673 KB
    • Webcast for 6.

    Decision:

    To defer the decision in order to hold further discussions with the applicant to find out

    ·         What was the current 'need'?

    ·         Had he considered erecting another affordable dwelling on the site to get more value from the plot?

    ·         Was he willing to consider a local need 106 agreement – affordable home on the property?

     

    Minutes:

    a)         The Senior Development Control Officer elaborated on the application's background noting that the site was located within an agricultural field on the outskirts of the village of Penygroes along a narrow road that turned into a public footpath. It was highlighted that the application was a resubmission of that refused under reference C20/0853/22/LL and had been submitted to the planning committee at the request of the Local Member.

     

    It was explained that Policy TAI 16 'Exception Sites' stated that provided it be shown that there was a proven local need for affordable housing which could not be delivered within a reasonable time-scale on a market site within the development boundary, as an exception, proposals for 100% affordable housing plans on sites immediately adjacent to development boundaries that formed a logical extension to the settlement would be granted.

     

    It was reported that information had not been submitted with the application noting that the application site touched the development boundary - it appeared that there was a gap between the site and the development boundary (which appeared to be a public footpath). In planning policy terms the site was defined as a location in open countryside and, therefore, was not relevant to be considered in terms of Policy TAI 16, 'Exception Sites' - this was supported in the Supplementary Planning Guidance 'Affordable Housing'.

     

    It was noted that the proposal was being proposed as an affordable dwelling. Although Tai Teg had confirmed that the applicant was eligible to purchase an affordable dwelling or self-build an affordable dwelling, no further information regarding the applicant's particular need for an affordable dwelling had been submitted as part of the application. It was highlighted that the internal floor area of the 2 bedroom, single-storey dwelling was approximately 110m square which was 50m greater than the maximum specified in the Supplementary Planning Guidance for an affordable 2 bedroom, single-storey dwelling. It was also noted that the height of the main roof-space meant there was potential to provide an additional floor above part of the dwelling in future. It was considered that the application site (which contained the proposed house and its curtilage) was very large, and that providing a curtilage of this size would be likely to increase the value of the property ultimately, which would render the house unaffordable in terms of price. On this basis, the proposal was considered to be contrary to the requirements of policy TAI 15 of the LDP and the SPG Affordable Housing in respect of the floor area shown.

     

    It was explained that policy PCYFF 2 provided development criteria, and stated that proposals must demonstrate compliance with all relevant policies of the LDP and national planning policies and guidance in the first place. It was reiterated that the policy listed a series of criteria that related to making the best use of land, incorporating amenity space, including provision for storing, recycling and managing waste, and including provision for effectively treating and eradicating invasive species. A site of this size would  ...  view the full minutes text for item 6.

    7.

    Application No C20/1093/24/LL Land By Talardd, Dinas, Caernarfon, LL54 7YN pdf icon PDF 400 KB

    Application for the erection of 16 dwellings with associated access, parking and landscaping.

     

    LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Aeron M Jones

     

    Link to relevant background documents

    Additional documents:

    • Plans , item 7. pdf icon PDF 5 MB
    • Webcast for 7.

    Decision:

    DECISION:

     

    To defer in order to:

    ·         Assess a habitats management statement

    ·         Re-assess the assessment after confirmation that all houses are affordable homes

    ·         Re-assess the linguistic statement and how the change affects linguistic matters

    ·         Include the late observations in the assessment

     

    Minutes:

    Attention was drawn to the late observations form.

    a) The Development Control Officer suggested that the application should be deferred for the following reasons:

    ·         Habitat Regulations Assessment from the Biodiversity Unit for the development confirmed that additional information was required from Welsh Water and Natural Resources Wales before it could be confirmed that the development would not have a detrimental impact on the Special Area of Conservation.

    ·         ADRA had confirmed the tenure of all units as a mixture of social and intermediate rents and, therefore, an opportunity to re-assess the assessment.

    b) It was proposed and seconded to defer the application.

     

    c) During the ensuing discussion, the following observation by a member was noted:

    ·         The linguistic statement was insufficient - a suggestion was made to reconsider

     

    RESOLVED:

     

    To defer in order to:

    ·         Assess a habitats management statement

    ·         Re-assess the assessment after confirmation that all houses are affordable homes

    ·         Re-assess the linguistic statement and how the change affects linguistic matters

    ·         Include the late observations in the assessment

     

    8.

    Application No C21/0376/34/LL Plot Of Land, Road From Capel Ebenezer Passing Bryn Eisteddfod And Gilfach To The Junction South Of Penarth, Clynnog Fawr, Clynnog, LL54 5BT pdf icon PDF 347 KB

    Application for the erection of a two storey dwelling with garage 

     

    LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Owain Williams

     

    Link to relevant background documents

    Additional documents:

    • Plans , item 8. pdf icon PDF 4 MB
    • Webcast for 8.

    Decision:

    DECISION:

     

    To defer

    ·         Need to re-advertise the application with the correct address – re-consult and re-position a site notification.

     

    Minutes:

    Application for the erection of a two-storey house with garage

     

                Attention was drawn to the late observations form.

     

    a       The Planning Manager highlighted that an observation had been received from the applicant's agent confirming that there was a need to rectify the site address.

     

    The Head of Legal Services added that he had received a request from the Local Member to defer the application as the application address was incorrect. He noted that statutory requirements were involved with advertising the application, which included detailed and accurate information - if the location address was unclear, this would highlight risks. 

     

    The Local Member added that the address had created confusion and that re-advertising would give local residents an opportunity to submit observations although he accepted that this would cause an inconvenience to the applicant.

     

    RESOLVED:

     

    To defer the application.

     

    • Need to re-advertise the application with the correct address - re-consult and re-position a site notification.

     

    9.

    Application No C20/0102/33/LL Plas Yng Ngheidio, Ceidio, Pwllheli, Gwynedd, LL53 8YL pdf icon PDF 170 KB

    Extend existing touring caravan site to adjacent land by creating new access from existing camp site, relocating one touring caravan site and adding 8 new touring caravans

     

    LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Anwen Davies

     

    Link to relevant background documents

    Additional documents:

    • Plans , item 9. pdf icon PDF 2 MB
    • Webcast for 9.

    Decision:

    To defer at the applicant’s request.

    ·         to note a deferral until September 2021

     

    Minutes:

    Attention was drawn to the late observations form.

     

    a) The Planning Officer highlighted that a request had come to hand from the applicant to withdraw the application from the Committee agenda. It was noted that there was no explanation for the need to withdraw the application and that the additional information received had not changed the planning opinion - there was no planning reason for deferring the application.

     

    b) It was proposed and seconded to defer the application.

     

     

    RESOLVED: 

     

    To defer at the applicant’s request.

    • to note a deferral until September 2021

     

    10.

    Application No C21/0483/33/LL Plas Yng Ngheidio, Ceidio, Pwllheli, Gwynedd, LL53 8YL pdf icon PDF 226 KB

    Demolish existing farm shed and erect new replacement agricultural shed to store machinery and feed

     

    LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Anwen Davies

     

    Link to relevant background documents

    Additional documents:

    • Plans , item 10. pdf icon PDF 1 MB
    • Webcast for 10.

    Decision:

    DECISION:

     

    To approve with conditions

     

    1.         Commence within five years.

    2.         In accordance with the plans

    3.         A grey coloured finish to match the existing sheds 

    4.         Agricultural use condition

     

    Note: Sustainable Drainage (SUDS)

     

    Minutes:

    a)         The Development Control Officer highlighted that the application involved the demolition of existing stone structures and the erection of a new agricultural shed in their place to store machinery and feed within the farmyard among existing farm buildings. The shed would be constructed from a wall of rendered blocks at the bottom and grey coloured steel sheeting on the walls and the roof. It was added that the application had been submitted to the Committee as the site was owned by a Council member.

     

    It was explained that the size and design of the shed was suitable and although the property was within the Llŷn Landscape of Outstanding Historical Interest designation, it was not considered that a shed of this scale, among existing buildings, would create a visual harmful impact on the wider historic landscape. In the context of biodiversity matters, it was reported that the Biodiversity Unit had originally requested a survey of protected species, however, following the receipt of further information and photographs, it had been confirmed that there was no need for a survey as the structures to be demolished were not suitable for bats.

     

    Having assessed the proposal against the relevant policies, it was considered that the proposal was acceptable in relation to the need, design, finish, impact on the landscape, amenities of residents, roads and biodiversity.

     

    b)         It was proposed and seconded to approve the application.

     

    c)         During the ensuing discussion, the following observation by a member was noted:

    ·         The shed was small and for the agricultural industry.

     

    RESOLVED:

     

    To approve with conditions

     

    1.         Commence within five years.

    2.         In accordance with the plans

    3.         A grey coloured finish to match the existing sheds 

    4.         Agricultural use condition

     

    Note: Sustainable Drainage (SUDS)

     

     

    11.

    Application No C20/0877/09/LL Maes Carafanau Pall Mall Ffordd Bryncrug, Tywyn, Gwynedd, LL36 9RU pdf icon PDF 288 KB

    Siting of 9 static holiday caravans in lieu of 12 touring caravans together with environmental improvements

     

    LOCAL MEMBERS: Councillor Anne Lloyd Jones and Councillor Mike Stevens

     

    Link to relevant background documents

    Additional documents:

    • Plans , item 11. pdf icon PDF 493 KB
    • Webcast for 11.

    Decision:

    To refuse the application

     

    1.    The proposal is very vulnerable to harm and is located within a C1 flood zone.  The proposal is not part of a regeneration strategy or strategy by the local authority and neither does it contribute to key employment objectives that are supported by the local authority and other key partners.  The proposal is not located on previously developed land either and the Flood Consequence Assessment submitted with the application fails to show that risks and flood consequences can be managed to an acceptable level. Therefore, the proposal does not meet the justification requirements included in paragraph 6.2 of Technical Advice Note Wales: Development and Flood Risk and, as a result, it is also contrary to the requirements of Policy PS 6 of the Gwynedd and Anglesey Joint Local Development Plan.

     

    2.    The increase in the proposed number of static holiday caravans is not small, or commensurate with the scale of the proposed improvements for the site and it is above the recommended increase of 10% in the original numbers on the site, therefore, it is contrary to the principles of point 4 of policy TWR 3 of the Anglesey and Gwynedd Joint Local Development Plan and Supplementary Planning Guidance: Tourist Facilities and Accommodation.

     

    3.    Insufficient consideration was given to landscaping matters as part of the proposal.  In light of this, it is not considered that the proposal would add towards maintaining or enhancing the landscape and that the proposal is contrary to the requirements of Policy PCYFF 4 of the Anglesey and Gwynedd Joint Local Development Plan.

     

     

    Minutes:

    The Development Control Officer highlighted that the proposal involved extending an existing caravan site in order to site nine static caravans in lieu of 12 touring caravans that had an extant planning permission on the existing caravan site. It was highlighted that the application site was located outside the development boundary of the existing caravan site and was located on level land in the countryside off the A493 between Tywyn and Bryncrug.

     

    The application was submitted to the Committee at the Local Member’s request.

     

    It was reported that the site was within a C1 flooding zone, which was associated with Technical Advice Note 15: Development and Flood Risk (TAN 15). The proposal was considered as very vulnerable to harm and TAN 15 in section 6.2 stated that locating such a development within a C1 zone should only be justified if it could be demonstrated that the proposal met the relevant criteria. Although discussions had been held with the applicant's agent regarding these matters, it was highlighted that no more information regarding the matter would be submitted.

     

    The Flood Consequence Assessment concluded that the proposal did not comply with TAN 15. Following Officers' assessment of considerations in paragraph 6.2 of TAN 15, it was considered that the proposal did not meet the relevant requirements and was therefore contrary to the requirements of TAN 15 and the flooding matters included in Policy PS 6.

     

    Another consideration that was given to the proposal was that it would increase the number of static caravans on the site from the original 35 to 55 - an increase of about 57%, which was way beyond the 10% referred to in Policy TWR 3 of the LDP.  As a result, it was considered that the proposal was contrary to point 4 iii of Policy TWR 3 as it would not involve a small increase in the number of units on the site.

     

    In response to observations received from Natural Resources Wales (NRW) expressing concern regarding the visual impact of the proposal on the landscape, it appeared that the application had noted an intention to undertake additional native landscaping but no details had been received. As a result, the impact of the proposal could not be assessed in full in terms of its setting in the wider landscape and, as a result, it was not considered that it would add to the maintenance or enhancement of the landscape and it would be contrary to the requirements of Policy PCYFF 4 of the LDP.

     

    It was recommended to refuse the application.

     

    b)         Taking advantage of the right to speak, the applicant noted the following points:

                In response to flooding concerns, he noted

    ·         That the application site was located on the periphery of a tidal flood risk zone with the majority of the caravan site, including the access, on dry land.

    ·         NRW had not considered that static holiday caravans had a cavity of approximately +750mm underneath the units - the caravan would not be affected.

    ·         There was access  ...  view the full minutes text for item 11.

    12.

    Application No C21/0332/42/DA Terfyn Lôn Terfyn, Morfa Nefyn, Pwllheli, Gwynedd, LL53 6BA pdf icon PDF 325 KB

    Non material amendments to approval C19/0982/42/LL to enlarge proposed veranda and pedestrian access

     

    LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Gareth M Jones

     

    Link to relevant background documents

    Additional documents:

    • Plans , item 12. pdf icon PDF 2 MB
    • Webcast for 12.

    Decision:

    DECISION

     

    Approve with conditions

     

    Non-material Amendment:

     

    The amendment hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict conformity with the details shown on plan 03/DR19, submitted to the Local Planning Authority on 21 June 2021, and contained in the application form and in any other documents accompanying the application, notwithstanding any condition(s) to amend that plan included in this planning decision. Notwithstanding the amendments hereby permitted, the remainder of the development must be completed in strict conformity with the details and conditions included in planning permission number C19/0982/42/LL.

     

    Minutes:

    Attention was drawn to the late observations form.

     

    Non-material amendments to permission C19/0982/42/LL to retain enlarged veranda

     

    a) The Planning Manager highlighted that this was an application for a non-material amendment to planning permission C19/0982/42/LL to retain works on extending a veranda on the property. It was explained that the frame of the veranda had already been built but the slate roof had not yet been laid. It was added that the columns extended out 1.6m from the front wall of the property - 50cm further than the planning permission already granted. The application had been submitted to seek to retain the changes following initial enforcement action and at the request of the Local Member.

     

    It was explained that under Section 96 A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, applicants may submit applications for Non-material Amendments to existing Planning Permissions since 1 September 2014. Welsh Government had Supplementary Planning Guidance: Approving Non-material Amendments to an Existing Planning Permission on what was deemed a non-material development, where clear assessment tests were listed.

     

    It was not considered that this minor amendment would be obvious when looking at the site from any public spaces, and whilst noting the neighbour's comments, it was not considered that the amendment would lead to any additional harmful impacts on amenity.

     

    b) Taking advantage of the right to speak, the applicant noted the following points:

    ·         They had moved to the area about two years ago and had purchased Terfyn with the intention of renovating the property, which was unfortunately deteriorating.

    ·         It was considered that the development in Terfyn had been in accordance with the style of the property and they had maintained the façade of the building at substantial additional cost.

    ·         The root of the need to adapt the veranda had been a simple error between himself and the builder, with the builder constructing it slightly too deep compared to the submitted plans.

    ·         They had been advised by the planning officer to resubmit non-material amendments to the original plans made in March 2021.

    ·         He accepted that objections had been raised regarding the size of the veranda and also that it would affect the privacy of nearby properties.

    ·         As the veranda had only been partially constructed, it could be accepted that concerns would be raised as it could appear, in its half-built state, that the veranda roof was flat, and that it would be possible for someone to walk out onto the veranda and have substantial views over nearby properties.

    ·         The finished veranda would have a slate roof in keeping with the existing roof of the property and it would not be possible to walk out onto the veranda - therefore, the allegation that the veranda would have a detrimental impact on privacy was invalid.

    ·         They had not undertaken any amendments to the style, size and location or the windows of the property, therefore, there had been no substantial change to the privacy element that affected any neighbouring property - this had been reiterated by the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 12.

    13.

    Application No C21/0111/45/LL Land By Cae Llan, Denio, Penrallt, Pwllheli, LL53 5UA pdf icon PDF 300 KB

    Full application for a new residential development of 14 dwellings to include associated service road and footpath, parking, landscaping and foul drainage pumping station

     

    LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Dylan Bullard

     

    Link to relevant background documents

    Additional documents:

    • Plans , item 13. pdf icon PDF 7 MB
    • Webcast for 13.

    Decision:

    DECISION

     

    To delegate the right for the Assistant Head of Department to approve the application, subject to completing a Section 106 Agreement to secure a financial contribution towards play areas and to ensure provision of four affordable dwellings. Also, conditions involving the following should be implemented:

     

    1.         Timescales

    2.         In accordance with the approved plans.

    3.         Permitted development restriction on the affordable dwellings.

    4.         Materials

    5.         Welsh Water / SUDS

    6.         Construction times

    7.         Finished floor levels

    8.         Privacy screens for balconies on plots 5 and 10

    9.         Highways access conditions

    10.       Landscaping

    11.       Protecting trees

    12.       Archaeological investigation

    13.       Welsh language mitigation measures – to advertise the site, names of the estate and the houses

     

    For information:  SUDS

     

    Minutes:

    Attention was drawn to the late observations form.

     

    a) The Development Control Team Leader highlighted that the application was a full application to construct 14 two-storey dwellings, with four of them as affordable homes. The site was located to the north of Pwllheli above the town centre in an area known as Denio. Although the site was located within the defined development boundary of Pwllheli, the existing development density is lower than the rest of the town. It was explained that Pwllheli was identified as an Urban Service Centre under policy TAI 1 of the  LDP, which encouraged a higher proportion of new developments within urban centres by means of housing designations and windfall sites. When adopting the LDP, the site was allocated for 14 units, therefore, the application met the requirements of policy TAI 1.

     

    It was reported that the applicant had submitted the open market value of the dwellings to show that a suitable discount could be applied to ensure they remained affordable in perpetuity. Having assessed the figures in consultation with the Housing Department, it was agreed to give a 40% discount when preparing a section 106 agreement.

     

    In the context of open spaces, it was noted that Policy ISA 5 of the LDP required new housing proposals for 10 or more new houses in areas where existing open spaces could not satisfy the needs of the proposed housing development to provide a suitable provision of open spaces. In exceptional circumstances, where it was not possible to provide an outdoor play area as an integral part of a new housing development, the developer would be required to provide suitable provision off the site; a site that is accessible and close to the development in terms of walking or cycling distance or, where this was not practically possible, to make a financial contribution towards new facilities including equipment, improving existing facilities on sites with access or improve access to existing open spaces.

     

    It was highlighted that the application did not include the provision of an open / play area on the site but that the plan provided the number of anticipated dwellings in accordance with the site allocation. Having assessed the plan, it was not unreasonable that there was no provision on the site and after using the formula within the SPG Open Spaces in New Housing Developments, the Joint Planning Policy Unit had calculated a financial contribution of £5855.71 towards provision off the site. A discussion was held with the applicant and it was agreed that the contribution would be ensured via a section 106 agreement.

     

    In the context of a linguistic impact, although there was no need to submit a formal statement, consideration should still be given to the Welsh language in accordance with the guidance in Appendix 5 of the 'Maintaining and Creating Distinctive and Sustainable Communities' SPG. It was highlighted that the applicant had considered the Welsh language and that the application complied with the requirements of section 'CH', Appendix 5  ...  view the full minutes text for item 13.

    14.

    Application No C21/0368/42/DT Tyn y Mynydd, Mynydd Nefyn, Nefyn, Pwllheli, Gwynedd, LL53 6LN pdf icon PDF 215 KB

    Single storey side extension

     

    LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Gruffydd Williams

     

    Link to relevant background documents

    Additional documents:

    • Plans , item 14. pdf icon PDF 2 MB
    • Webcast for 14.

    Decision:

    DECISION

     

    To refuse the application contrary to the recommendation

     

    ·         Design and materials of the extension were out of character

    ·         Impact on the AONB and the Dark Sky Status

     

    Minutes:

    The Planning Manager highlighted that the application was a full application to construct a single-storey extension that would measure 4.5 metres x 3.6 metres, which would include a garden room in a single-storey cottage located on the slopes of Mynydd Nefyn. It was noted that the nearest residential homes were over 40 metres to the north and north-east of the proposed extension and that the application was being submitted to the Committee at the request of the Local Member.

    It was explained that Policy PCYFF3 stated that proposals would be approved, including extensions and changes to existing buildings and structures, if they complied with a number of criteria that included, that the proposal

    ·         added to or enhanced the character of the site, the building or the area in terms of setting, appearance, scale, height, mass and elevation treatment; 

    ·         respected the context of the site and its place in the local landscape;

    ·         used materials that were appropriate to its surroundings and incorporated soft and hard landscaping;

    ·         improved a safe and integrated transport and communication network;

    ·         limited water run-off and flood risk and prevented pollution;

    ·         achieved an inclusive design;

    ·         enabled access for all;

    ·         helped to create healthy and lively environments considering the health and well-being of future users.

    It was highlighted that the extension would include a garden room with significant glazed windows of acceptable and suitable size and scale for the location. Although the site was high on the slopes of Mynydd Nefyn with views over the coast, it was not considered that the proposal would have a substantial detrimental impact on the amenities or character of the nearby AONB due to the nature of the local landscape and vegetation within the local area.  In response to an objection received claiming that the proposal would have an impact on the cottage and the AONB, although there was an intention to construct an extension of modern material and design, it was noted that the location of the extension on the gable end of the cottage, and its size, would not significantly impair the appearance and character of the property or the AONB.

    b) Taking advantage of the right to speak, the applicant noted the following points:

    ·         It was an application for a small garden room on the Western front side of the cottage.

    ·         The purpose of the extension was to provide an additional living space and to get more light into the property.

    ·         As it was a small Welsh cottage, it was quite dark with very small north-facing windows.

    ·         By opening up the gable end and installing glazed windows, it was hoped to get more light into the property and allow them to make the best of the beautiful views across the Bay of Nefyn and Porthdinllaen.

    ·         The extension on the gable end would be mainly constructed in glass, but using Welsh slate tiles on the roof to assimilate with the existing tiles, thus retaining the character of the original structure.

    ·         The proposal was in accordance with the character  ...  view the full minutes text for item 14.

     

  • Last 7 days
  • Month to date
  • Year to date
  • The previous Month
  • All Dates Before
  • All Dates After
  • Date Range
Start Date
PrevNext
July 2025
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
End Date
PrevNext
July 2025
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
  • Y saith diwrnod diwethaf
  • Y mis hyd yma
  • Y flwyddyn hyd yma
  • Y mis blaenorol
  • Pob dyddiad cyn hynny
  • Pob dyddiad ar ôl hynny
  • Ystod y dyddiadau
Start Date
BlaenorolNesaf
Gorffennaf 2025
LlMaMeIaGwSaSu
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   
End Date
BlaenorolNesaf
Gorffennaf 2025
LlMaMeIaGwSaSu
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031