To consider the report
which aims to raise awareness of the Council's parking management arrangements and responsibilities, work outputs and
challenges for the future
Minutes:
Submitted - a report from the Senior Property Manager detailing the Council's parking management arrangements and responsibilities, its work outputs
and its challenges
for the future. The staffing structure showed that the Service, since 2012, had faced significant savings/ cuts despite responding
to the same workload. It
was highlighted that the pay and display
arrangements that were in place
in 60 of the County's car parks, along with
Annual Parking Permits and payments
from parking enforcement, had led to receiving
an income of £2.65m by
2018/19. It was noted
that the income was a key part of the Council's annual revenue income and contributed towards maintaining services. In accordance
with legislative requirements, any income gathered from parking management
would be reinvested in the highway network.
Attention was drawn to future challenges and finding a range of options to guarantee an increase in
the parking income. If the effect of inflation was to be met and a contribution of £180,000 made toward the savings targets, by 2022/23 the annual income would need
to be £450,000 higher than in
2018/19.
Gratitude was expressed for the information.
In response to an observation regarding losing approximately £45,000 in income from the free Christmas parking offer, individual members highlighted the following observations:
·
There was a need to consider the time limits before
abolishing the service.
·
Possible that it did not offer value for money as it was being used by 9-5pm workers?
·
Needed to consider methods to dissuade workers from using it.
·
Needed better timings - end of November - to coincide with Black Friday? Weekends in the run up to Christmas?
·
Offer free parking evenings when events were
held in the town.
·
Free parking was a good scheme and supported
Local Businesses.
The
Senior Property Manager accepted the observations and noted it was intended to review the current arrangement.
In response to an observation regarding the appeals graph included in the report and
the need for more detailed information about the numbers that were issued
and the numbers that were challenged,
it was accepted that the graph was basic and it would be possible to include more detailed data.
In response to an observation regarding how electric
car charging facilities would be funded it was reported that the scheme was likely to be funded through grants in its
initial phase. It was reiterated that the demand for this
type of facility was currently very low, but there
was a need to prepare beforehand by undertaking work to assess suitable locations within the County.
During the ensuing discussion,
the following points were highlighted by individual Members:
·
There was a need to highlight the difference between the ownership of a private car park and the Council's
car parks.
·
Double machines were needed,
offering the facility to pay with cash
or card.
·
The total increases in parking fees
appeared difficult in terms of pennies
/ cash - needed to keep the amounts straightforward.
·
A suggestion to pay for an annual
parking ticket in monthly instalments.
·
What were the costs for maintaining the 57 free car parks? Would it be possible to transfer the resource for local communities
to manage them, this would reduce
costs for the Council?
·
Needed to ensure that the service was effective. No excuse for
the fact that machines did not work during busy weekends!
·
There was a need to rationalise parking fees across
the County.
·
Local Parking Ticket - would it be possible to increase the ticket criteria for parking in
long-stay car parks?
·
With an increasing demand
for enforcement, was it possible to consider installing cameras in some car parks
to free up officers' time to enforce at other car parks?
In response to some
of the above mentioned observations, the officers noted:
·
The use of cameras was impersonal, covert and expensive but
was a possible option for the future.
·
Officers were under an
increasing demand to enforce a wide range of fields. Although it was possible to offer
a cross-departmental service,
this involved intensive training for the officers in a number of legislative fields. It was reiterated that discussions were ongoing but there
was a need to simplify the legislation and weigh up practical
issues.
·
That ensuring and establishing
fairness in setting parking fees across the County had been one of the main considerations in submitting parking
management arrangements in 2015. The intention was to continue to establish consistency and fairness throughout the County when considering
possible options to increase income from parking in
future.
·
It was possible to hold 'case by case' discussions
with Community/Town Councils regarding the transfer of the responsibility for free car parks
within the County.
·
It would be possible to introduce a range of possible options once the Full Council
had decided on its budget for
2019/20 on 7 March 2019.
RESOLVED
to accept the report with a request for officers to consider the observations of the Members when providing
an update in due course
on the range of options to ensuring an increase in
the parking income.
Supporting documents: