• Calendar
  • Committees
  • Community Councils
  • Consultations
  • Decisions
  • Election results
  • ePetitions
  • Forthcoming Decisions
  • Forward Plans
  • Library
  • Meetings
  • Outside bodies
  • Search documents
  • Subscribe to updates
  • Your councillors
  • Your MPs
  • Your MEPs
  • What's new
  • Agenda item

    QUESTIONS

    • Meeting of The Council, Thursday, 8th October, 2015 1.00 pm (Item 7.)

    To consider any questions the appropriate notice for which have been given under Section 4.19 of the Constitution.

     

    Minutes:

    Question from Councillor Sion Jones

     

    “What is the Leader’s view on wasting public money on external consultants?”

     

    Answer from Councillor Dyfed Edwards, Council Leader

     

    (The Leader’s written response had been circulated to members in advance.)

     

    “It is likely that all of us in the Chamber can state that we are not keen to see public money being wasted in any situation. I believe that all of us have work to do to ensure that any public expenditure is undertaken in the most appropriate and efficient manner. As the answer outlines, there is always a need to enquire about and scrutinise the Council’s expenditure and indeed that is the work of the scrutiny committees and the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee has decided to undertake a piece of work to examine expenditure on external consultants and that report will be available for members in due course. I do not anticipate what the outcome of that work will be but I have said that there is a need for us to commission work from external bodies and external agencies to assist us in the process. The examples I think about are those where the Council seeks to create change. Clearly, we must have an independent person to be involved in that work and we should not support both sides of the argument at the same time. That is not possible. The presence of independent people in the situation is required to ensure fairness for everyone and of course expenditure is associated with that.  Let us see what results are achieved by the working group that is looking at this.”

     

    A supplementary question by Councillor Sion Jones

     

    “The Leader states in his written response that if the specialist skills or necessary capacity is not available within the Council, that we will be using external consultants. I think that that is quite insulting. We have 7000 members of staff working for Gwynedd Council and I believe that there are fantastic skills in this Council to deal with the work that is required by these external consultants. Is the Leader willing to apologise for wasting public money?”

     

    Answer from Councillor Dyfed Edwards, Council Leader

     

     “It is not insulting to recognise that we do not always have all the skills. Is this not the reality of the situation? We are not all experts on everything. There are situations where we require specialist support and advice. In that situation, is not ensuring that we receive the appropriate and suitable advice the responsible thing to do? Indeed, unless we do that, we could be challenged. The Wales Audit Office would be after us and there would be situations where we could be challenged. There is also a bit of reality involved, i.e. as we reduce the workforce, we do not have the capacity to do everything. That is impossible. There are not enough hours in the day to do everything and that is a by-product of facing cuts which means that we reduce staff numbers. With regards to public expenditure, I am not in favour of wasting money, whether it be at home or in any public organisation, and we must keep a close eye on it. If you want to look at public expenditure, and coming to a conclusion about the efficiency and effectiveness of that expenditure is a matter for everyone, visit the website of the Wales Audit Office. It is noted on the website what every public body has spent on consultants. The Welsh Government has spent millions on consultants. I am not saying that that is wasting money, but I draw your attention to the need for public bodies to spend money outside that body. I am not going to apologise for what the Council has done in terms of expenditure. Let us look at the report that is going to specifically examine expenditure on consultants in detail. Let us come to conclusions then. How can we come to a conclusion about the pattern of the Council’s expenditure without seeing the facts? I am astounded that a member can stand in the Chamber and make such a statement when he is a member of the committee that has commissioned the work! Was the member present at the committee when a decision was made to commission the work? Perhaps he was not – no he was not! The Committee has commissioned the work and let us see what the result of that work will be before coming to any conclusions. Doing anything else would be total madness, if I may add.”