Cabinet Member – Councillor Gareth Thomas
To consider a
report on the above (attached).
Decision:
To accept the report and to note the observations submitted during the meeting.
Minutes:
The Leader of the Council, the Cabinet
Member for Economy and Community and the officers were welcomed to the meeting.
Submitted - the report of the Cabinet Member
for Economy and Community inviting the committee to scrutinise the steps taken
thus far to formulate the draft visitor economy principles and the steps
proposed to draw up the Gwynedd Sustainable Visit Economy Plan 2030.
The Cabinet Member set out the context by
noting that the visitor economy was an important part of the county's economy,
with a large number being employed in the industry directly and
indirectly. However, as Covid struck the industry, it had become apparent that the
Council had to revisit its principles in the field. There had been a significant change in the
way we perceived the visitor economy.
Previously, everyone had been viewing the visitor as central to any
visitor economy, by now however, the opinion was that the residents of Gwynedd
should be central to any principles around the visitor economy, and this had
been at the forefront of developing the principles. If the people of Gwynedd saw the benefit and that
the visitor economy was acceptable to them, this then fed through to the
visitor's experience. It was noted that
a workshop had been arranged for all Gwynedd councillors on 2 March, 2021 to
submit the draft principles, with the intention of submitting them to the
Cabinet before the end of March to be adopted in draft form to consult on them
with the people of Gwynedd.
The Leader agreed that developing these
principles was a significant change of direction for the Council. We saw last year what 'unsustainable'
tourism was, and this was the type of tourism that damaged the environment, and
had a bad impact on communities. Stating
that we were setting a new direction was very important. It was believed that the industry was also
seeing the need to reflect our society much better, and the principles formed
the basis for the type of support and direction the Council had given the
industry. Meetings with the industry had
demonstrated that tourism was an important industry for our people, although
there was a perception that it was owned by others. The pandemic had demonstrated that rural
areas such as Gwynedd were by now very nearly fully reliant on tourism, and
this was a motivation to continue with the work of seeking to create a much
more varied economy. Although Gwynedd
was getting £1.3 billion through the industry, Gwynedd's household income was
among the lowest in the country, and there was a need to develop a hospitality
industry that provided good careers and good employment. Examples of this already existed, and there
was a need to work to improve the quality of the industry in Wales.
The Leader then referred to a letter of
response from the National Park to the Council's decision to urgently research
the possibility of charging visitors who visited parts of the park. He noted that the letter stated that it would
be entirely impossible to charge people for going to Snowdon's summit, but that
this did not prevent us from looking at other ways of generating income. The Park's plan to create a transport system
in the areas of Snowdon and Ogwen was an example of
this, and there was an opportunity here, not only to create a better
environment, but also to create a low carbon public transport system that would
serve local people as well as visitors.
It was very much hoped, following the members' workshop, that it would
be possible to hold an open conference to hold a discussion on all of these
matters, and to elevate some of the questions that arose.
Members were given an opportunity to ask
questions and make observations. During
the discussion, the following observations were noted:
·
That the sub-principle of 'Maintaining and Respecting our Environment' suggested that things would
be kept as they were, rather than being developed and improved.
·
There was a need to educate visitors to respect our
communities and the officers were thanked for their efforts in this field.
·
It was possible to overreact to the situation as the
number of visitors to the area would fall once the pandemic was over.
·
Not everyone was looking forward to seeing tourism
return to the area after the lockdown period, and by sending the message out
asking people to respect the area, they should also seek to change the mind-set
of local people so that they understood that Gwynedd's economy was reliant on
tourism.
·
That tourism was intertwined with all communities in
Gwynedd, and not in the main holiday destinations only.
·
The idea of looking at examples of successful
sustainable tourism in other countries, and to tailor them for Gwynedd's
communities was welcomed.
·
There was a need to be innovative to benefit from
tourism.
·
There was a need to find a balance that was fair to
everyone, but also put the people of Gwynedd first.
·
There was a need to understand what was meant by
'unsustainable' tourism and there was a danger that what was currently taking
place would spoil our communities.
·
There was a need to ensure work that paid well in the
field of tourism in Gwynedd in order for local people to remain in their
communities.
·
There was concern that parts of the county would face
more difficulties this summer as people who were used to going overseas could
decide to come here for their holiday.
·
There was a need to force motor home owners to stay in
specific sites, rather than parking on the roadsides.
In response to the observations and
questions from members, it was noted:
·
The principles, by adopting them, would be principles
for the whole Council. A significant
number of visitors had visited parts of Gwynedd last summer, and there had been
very good collaboration across the entire Council to prepare for what could
happen again this summer.
·
It was agreed that the use of the word 'Maintain'
in the sub-principle 'Maintain and Respect our Environment' suggested
that things were perfect as they were, and there was a need to consider the
wording in the report that would go before the Cabinet. It was also noted that there would be an
opportunity to make this kind of observation at the members' workshop and
during the consultation in due course.
·
That it was intended to allocated some time at the
start of the members' workshop to identify the main matters that arose last
year and to explain how the Environment, Highways and Municipal and Economy and
Community Departments, along with different agencies, intended to respond to
that for the forthcoming season in terms
of matters such as illegal parking, motor homes, litter, beach management,
destination management in general and how to facilitate access and the flow of
people within destinations, etc. It was
further noted that work had been completed last summer in twenty destinations
in terms of securing arrangements for distancing, signage and ensuring that
local residents and visitors respected the regulations, and it was intended to
build on this work for the coming season.
Work was also taking place between departments to plan ahead and bids
had been submitted to the Government for additional funding to support the
work. It was intended to send out
messages of safe enjoyment of the area for the season ahead and to encourage
responsible behaviour. It was explained
there had been no work to promote the area last year, rather, there had been a
focus on working with the Police, the National Park and the Health Board in
terms of responsible behaviour and responsible destination. It was intended to build on this this season
and carry out significant work on changes to the Snowdonia Mountains and Coast
website and use it as a platform to share information. There was also further
work afoot by the Maritime Service in terms of responsible behaviour messages
along the coast, in light of several cases of difficulties in some locations
last summer. There was also work taking
place to share information with the private sector to highlight matters in
terms of regulations and grants and sharing good practice.
·
This Council did not contribute to North Wales
Tourism. It was funded by its members,
but a large number of those members came from Gwynedd.
·
It was agreed that we had to bring the communities
with us, and as an example of this, reference was made to Dolan, a joint
project between Dyffryn Nantlle,
Dyffryn Ogwen and Blaenau Ffestiniog, looking at the benefit that tourism brought to
the community. Also, it was considered
that developing the relationship between some of the main attractions and their
local communities was a way of getting the communities to see the possible
benefits. Consideration was also given
to the possibility of formulating a community and business ambassadors scheme,
as a way of making the people of Gwynedd understand what was exceptional about
our area, as a means for them to convey these aspects to the visitors, as well
as having an understanding of them themselves.
·
There was recognition that the STEAM model
(Scarborough Tourism Economic Assessment Model) was not perfect, but this was
the model used by the Government to allocate additional grant funding to the
Council each year based on the increased population during the summer
months. It was also used by several
councils in Britain, and internationally, and despite its faults, it offered an
element of consistency as so many used it.
The model looked at the visitor numbers and the value trends, but there
may be a need to look at a different measure, and there was recognition that there
was a need to review how this worked. It
was added that the initial projections for 2019/20 showed a reduction of
50%-60% in economic benefits and the visitor numbers, although obviously the
numbers that had visited the area over summer months was high, with fewer going
overseas due to the pandemic. In terms
of moving forward, it was important to expand the series of measures to include
additional performance measures that would assist in realising the vision of
placing the residents of Gwynedd at the centre.
·
That the process of developing the principles
recognised the fact that tourism was embedded in all parts of life in Gwynedd,
and it was also hoped to incorporate the principles of the regeneration
framework that would be developed for Gwynedd.
It was further noted, in terms of good practice across the world, that
the Department was about to commission Dr Terry Stevens, an Expert in
Sustainable Destinations and Tourism to advise whether the principles were
fully in sync with sustainable tourism and which measures could be developed to
measure the success of those principles in future. He would also advise the Department on good
practice in other areas, the visiting trends over the next ten years, and how
to communicate with developing markets.
It was added that Dr Stevens could be invited to address the conference
in March on what was happening internationally in the field of tourism.
·
That discussions were taking place between the
Environment and the Highways and Municipal Departments and the National Park to
seek to identify the best means of responding to the problems that were arising
with motor homes. There were short-term
answers, such as communicating the message and erecting signs and height
restrictions in car parks along with more long-term solutions, such as
introducing bylaws and enforcement. It
was intended to share the matters and the implementation responsibilities for
the next season, and the Environment Department would be leading on this element,
with input from the Economy Department.
RESOLVED
to accept the report, noting the observations made during the meeting.
Supporting documents: