To submit a report by the Maritime Officer and Pwllheli Harbour Manager
Income Inflation 2022-2023
Maritime Fees DRAFT 2022-2023
Maritime Committee Situation 28-2-22
Decision:
To note and
accept the report
Minutes:
Everyone
was welcomed and pride was expressed that so many were able to attend the
meeting. It was noted that the
arrangement of meeting virtually had worked great, and had been of assistance
to those who were not local to be able to attend meetings with greater
ease. Despite this, it was confirmed it
would be nice to meet face-to-face when this was allowed.
Reference was made to the report created jointly by the
Maritime Service Manager and the Hafan Manager, and it was reported as follows:
Port Marine
Safety Code
Although Councillor Gareth Thomas was the Safety Code Duty
Holder, it was extremely important to receive input from all the Committee
Members on the code. It was confirmed
that two inspections had been held by the Coastguard Agency, which confirmed
full required compliance with the Code. The report on the Accident on the Menai
Straights was mentioned as grounds of the importance for everyone to look at
their Code and consider the importance of the Code and individuals’
responsibilities in order to ensure compliance.
Dredging the
Channel
it was confirmed that the work done by the 'Royal Smalls'
company had been very successful, with around 20,000 fewer cubes of silt in the
inner harbour this year. It was reported that most of the silt had been emptied
into the stilling lagoon and now the lagoon was full and there was a need to
plan to empty the stilling lagoon soon. It was noted that the next step was
dredging the Hafan basin but first the work on testing the siltthat had settled
at the bottom the marina needed to be completed. Unfortunately, the timetable
for 2022 did not allow further dredging work to be done in the basin and
therefore it would be programmed for 2023/24.Reference was made to the meeting
held with 'Royal Smalls' to discuss the options in terms of what to do with the
lagoon, as the original lagoon was full, in considering how, when and what the
cost would be to empty the stilling lagoon.
The Committee was reminded that in the past, the silt had been
transported to Harlech the first time, and left on neighbouring land the second
time, but by now levels had reached heights where it was not possible to do
this again. It was anticipated that 20,000 cubes needed disposing from the
stilling lagoon. Reference was also made
to other options such as mixing sand and silt for commercial use, but of course
this came with its own challenges. At
the meeting with 'Royal Smalls' the option of locating bags on the land,
processing it and drying it on the site then disposing of it were also
discussed. Further discussions would follow on the matter.
The mouth of
the Harbour
The Committee was reminded that the work of dredging the
mouth of the Harbour took place every year, around March and April. This year,
the Service had decided that May would be a much more effective month to
undertake the work. It was confirmed that the work would be done by using
machines on- land and storing the sand on the present site. It was noted that it was proposed to invest
£60,000 to £70,000 this year.
The size of the sand heap had reduced significantly
recently as 20,000 tonnes of sand had been sold for beach replenishment near Hafan
y Mor. The Chair confirmed his wish that any money that came back to the
Maritime fund through the sale of sand was invested in the Pwllheli Harbour
dredging fund, but it was reported by the Maritime Manager that he could not
provide assurance of this.
In response to a question on the Strategy, the Assistant
Head of Economy and Community Department confirmed that the Dredging Strategy
was still alive and ongoing and the need regarding the groyne had been
identified as needing consistent and regular attention. It was confirmed that discussions regarding
the sediment, and its use, remained in the pipeline. There was further
confirmation that the pilot work would start in Pwllheli in terms of the flood
prevention work.
In response to an observation regarding the concern that
the pontoon was approaching the end of its lifespan, the Maritime Service
Manager reported that they had maintained it to a high standard and it was
refurbished when needed, and this to the required standard, but further
investment would be needed in due course.
In response to an observation regarding dredging, it was
noted that not many vessels had been taken out of the harbour in 2021/22 and
that the depth of the water in the marina and the navigational channel was
looking good. Thanks were expressed for the availability of the results of the
survey and the good work done by the Service was acknowledged.
Financial
Matters
The Maritime Service Manager referred to the figures that
noted comparisons and an overview, but noted he had not gone into detail on the
figures that went up to the end of February.
Members’ attention was drawn to the following, giving an explanation as
appropriate:
There was an overspend in terms of Property (£19,261), as
it included electricity costs.
Transport included vessels, hoist and a tractor. It was
noted the use of red diesel in the hoist was not permitted from the 1st of
April. This meant that a new diesel tank would need to be installed on the site
so it would be possible to store white diesel on the site for the hoist.
It was noted that the situation was sure to change before
the end of the financial year.
It was confirmed that Pwllheli Harbour, with a much lower
budget than Hafan, showed an improvement of £17,000 better than the budget
target.
Additionally, £750,000 profit had been reported for the
Hafan, and it was felt that it was important that such money stayed within the
Council andwais used to benefit Gwynedd residents. He emphasised that a further
report would follow once the current financial year had come to an end.
Reference was made to the fees spreadsheet and it was
confirmed that the Service was still waiting on confirmation of the fees and
awaiting the Statutory Officer's observations before releasing the fees
publicly. It was confirmed that the
Service did not recommend raising the yearly mooring fees. He took the
opportunity to thank loyal customers, and new customers, and even though there
was a recommendation freeze the annual mooring fee, it was not possible to
freeze the electricity costs.
As a result of the land provided for the Lifeboat slipway,
there was less e land to store vessels over the winter. A number of the vessels
currently on the land belonged to individuals twho were not berth holders. It was noted that the intention was to
encourage these boat owners to move them, by informing them that the fee for
this service will be increased and that priority would be given to vessels with
an annual agreement on the pontoon. It
was confirmed that this would be developed further in due course.
The Chair and the Pwllheli Marina Berth Holder's
Association Representative expressed their pride that there was an agreement to
keep the fees at the same rate. It was
questioned why the costs for some visitors were more than others (e.g. the
price for a motorboat was higher than a sailing boat). The Maritime Service
Manager explained that a number of vessels made use but did not contribute as
much, or did not even register with the Council and this created difficulties. As a result, the concept was if they did not
come to a long-term agreement, that they would contribute more in visitor
fees. The Hafan Manager confirmed that
the Council was keeping an eye on other marinas also, confirming that the
contribution from motorboats was less.
The parking and launching service was discussed, and a 100%
full situation was anticipated for 2022.
It was noted that the income from
visiting vessels was very low, with some vessels only needing a holding mooring
or somewhere to shelter from a storm.
The committee felt that that the discussion was positive, and noted
concern that there were no empty moorings, although there were empty moorings
in Plas Heli. It was noted that Pwllheli
was an open harbour and could not turn boats away.
One member of the Committee reported his concern that there
were no empty spaces, referring to the £1.6 million income in 2021 and a target
of £1.4 million, which meant that there was money left over. He noted his
strong wish for the money to be invested in expanding or making improvements,
such as the quality of the land or even doing something different. He urged members of the Committee to spread
the word that there had not been an increase in the fees and noted his hope
that the future would be bright.
The Assistant Head of Economy and Community Department
welcomed the increase in numbers and noted his wish that the investment plans
would be available in due course. He
also noted when the Hafan was successful it showed not only its potential but
confirmed it as an important economic asset.
Despite this, he noted that he was not sure if it was possible to keep
all the profit in Pwllheli, but gave assurance that he would present cases to
invest. Another member of the Committee
noted that this asset (Hafan) was key and that it needed looking after and that
any long-term plan should allow the Council to do other things to improve and
develop the site.
Spreadsheet III from the appendices was submitted to the
Committee which referred to matters relating to inflation and its side
effects. A member of the Committee noted
their discontent with receiving the inflation statistics so late in the day,
and noted the impact of this was that it did not allow a fair opportunity to
consider them. The Chair echoed this
observation and noted the importance of receiving the figures in good time, and
proceeded to question whether it would be possible to hold a Committee meeting
during the summer months?
The Maritime Manager confirmed that calling a meeting in
the summer months would be hard as calling a meeting for Pwllheli Harbourwould
also require asking for a meeting, in terms of consistency, for Porthmadog,
Aberdyfi and Barmouth Harbours and this was not practical. The Committee was reminded not to keep
matters of concern until the next meeting and members were reminded that it was
possible to contact the Officers at any time, for instance reference was made
to a recent meeting between the Pwllheli Marina Berth Holders' Association
Representative and the Maritime Service Manager where a number of matters that
were a cause for concern for the Association had been discussed. There was no
need to wait until the Committee to discuss matters or to present matters of
concern.
The Hafan Manager reported on the Operational
Matters as follows:
He confirmed that
all navigation aids were on their appropriate sites and that all the beacons
and navigation lights were working. There were no notieces for manirers in
place in Pwllheli.
Fuel Quay
He confirmed that
the fuel pump was ten years old by now, and that a new pump would be installed
in its place during May/June 2022. From
1/4/22, every machine or vehicle that operated on the land had to use white
diesel. Red diesel would continue to be sold currently for the use of vessels,
but there was no assurance how long this would continue. The availability of
petrol on the pontoon was questioned, and it was confirmed that a pipe had been
squeezed and it was hard to get a mechanic out to pay attention to the matter,
but that it had been resolved by now.
In terms of the
concern of the foot ramp down to the fuel quay, it was confirmed that a price
had been received for a new ramp, and that the work of installing it would take
place in the next financial year.
Storage on the Land
The Hafan Manager
reported that 25 boats were stored ashore and had been there for a long time
and it did not appear that they were going to be launched to the water in the
near future. It was noted that the only
answer to reduce numbers would be to increase the fee for land storage, in the
hope that this would free up these spaces for those with a yearly mooring
agreement.
In response to an
observation about lack of space, reference was made to the plans in terms of
Glan y Don, noting that such special places were so important, and we should be
conscious of not losing these.
In terms of car
park arrangements, it was questioned whether it would be possible to have a
hardstanding to park or would it be possible to share Plas Heli's car
park? The Hafan Manager confirmed the
proposal to work around what was available and maybe look in more detail at the
compound. It was confirmed that Plas
Heli car park was available, and that arrangements had been made to put
barriers on the entrances. It was
suggested that maybe the message had not penetrated that the car park was
available for Hafan users, and it was possible that further discussion on the
matter between the Maritime Service Manager and Plas Heli Manager was needed.
Harbour Statistics
It was confirmed
that 410 boat contracts had been allocated, with 63 on the waiting list, and
that it promised to be a successful term
in 2022. The Maritime Service Manager
reminded of the Committee of the need to register vessels and Personal
Watercraft, noting that this also included the vessels without an annual
berth/pontoon berth. He reported that
there had been a number of cases during 2021 where such boats had not been
registered, even though it was mandatory to do so.
It was confirmed
that there were registering arrangements in place everywhere else, and the side
effect of not registering would be to raise the fee for park and launch
companies or to install a barrier to force companies to comply with security
issues. It was agreed to make an appeal
through Pwllheli Maritime Traders Association Representative regarding the need
for boats to be registered online, then choose where they launched from.
The Pwllheli
Maritime Traders Association Representative reported that a rise of 5% for the
park and launch service was acceptable, and that the four companies in the
field would be putting their reputation in the balance if there was no
compliance in terms of registering. He confirmed that they were active in
informing their customers, including the need for them to have their stickers,
and felt there was no more they could do.
Reference was made to the problem in terms of lack of sticker
availability and it was questioned if other Harbours were being watched as
closely as Pwllheli Harbour? In addition,
the need to also keep an eye on watercraft that used small slipways nearby was
noted. He made reference to the need for a new gate to the pontoon as the
current gate was rotting.
Thanks were
expressed for the observations and it was noted that the Hafan Manager would
look at the matters raised. The Hafan
Manager reported, in terms of the concern for watercraft, that two Authorities
had banned watercraft from launching, but Gwynedd had not followed this route
to date.
The Maritime
Service officer thanked the Maritime Traders Association companies for their
work, confirming that the above were the Harbour's Regulations, and noted his
thanks for all the efforts when complying with the Regulations.
Harbour Review
The Committee was
informed of the appointment of Gerwyn Owen as the Pwllheli Hafan and Harbour
Commercial Manager and he would commence tin post from 1/6/22. It was confirmed that the Hafan/Harbour would
be an individual Unit from them on, and there would be changes on the horizon
as a result. It was confirmed that the
Maritime Service Manager would not be leading on this Committee from the
October 2022 meeting onwards.
It was hoped that
relationships would be improved especially following the observations of the
Pwllheli Maritime Traders Association Representative that they felt alienated,
claiming there was no communication regarding the launching problems.
The Chairman
thanked the Maritime Service Manager for all his work and support at the
meetings.
RESOLVED :
(1) To note and accept the report.
Any Other Business
Pwllheli Sailing
Club Representative reported that the RYA British sailing races would be held
in the area at the start of April 2022, and this was a very important event,
where over 300 competitors were expected. It was noted that there was a lot of
planning work in order to ensure it was a successful event, and there was a
warm welcome for everyone to attend.
Everyone was
thanked for their valuable contributions.
Supporting documents: