To
present information about the Department's contribution to the Language Policy.
Decision:
Derbyn yr adroddiad gan nodi’r sylwadau a
dderbyniwyd.
Minutes:
The report was
presented by the Head of the Environment Department. An amendment to the report was noted, namely
that 67.8% of the Department had completed the Welsh language assessment, and
that 93% of those who responded achieved the language designation of their
post. He referred to the following points in the report:
-
It was difficult to
recruit individuals with the correct expertise to work in the field of planning
and public protection. He explained that
inclusion courses were being arranged to assist with this.
-
The ability to work virtually had changed the
department's working methods, and a number of staff
had left the department to apply for posts in other locations. However, it was
noted that virtual working also meant that the Council was able to attract
prospective employees. It was identified that training and investment was
needed to encourage officers to remain in their posts.
-
It was noted that there
was a need to develop the field of recruitment and to create and maintain links
with schools and colleges as things returned to usual following the COVID
period.
-
It was explained that there were language difficulties
when documents were created between the department and external companies, and
a need to ensure that there was no misinterpretation between the Welsh and
English.
-
It was emphasised that
many companies operated voluntarily on the department's recommendations to
secure Welsh names for developments although there was no enforcing
legislation.
An opportunity was given
for committee members to ask further questions -
-
Why had a number of staff left the department, and what was the reason? A
request was also made for an update on changes within the department. It was
noted that investment was being made in staff training in the department in
order to develop them further. He added that there had been a long period of
stability over recent years, but the changes to working methods during the
pandemic had provided individuals with opportunities beyond the Council.
-
A question was asked
about whether it was intended to forge a link with Coleg Cymraeg
Cenedlaethol or schools and colleges to encourage
young people to apply for the posts available within Gwynedd Council.
Recruitment had been highlighted as a field that required development, but
unfortunately the plans had been held back by the pandemic, and it was hoped
that they could be re-instated soon. However, it was explained that a great
deal of work had been done to promote posts locally.
-
A question was asked about whether it was intended to
develop Welsh terminology within the department. It was explained that the
matter of terminology was difficult and that the service was required to offer
a bilingual invitation to tender. The need to be careful with agreements and
contracts was noted, to ensure that there was no misinterpretation between both
languages. Consequently, the department had received legal advice to submit
agreements and contracts in one language, and that the language could therefore
vary between companies.
-
Disappointment was expressed that there was no law to
ensure that native Welsh names used locally were prioritised, but it was
emphasised that the department encouraged the use of Welsh, and that a high
percentage of companies accepted the Language Unit's recommendations.
DECISION
To accept the report and
note the observations received.
Supporting documents: