Submit
a draft Committee Operating Framework in order for it to be recommended for the
Full Council to adopt
Decision:
To approve the
Committee Framework to be submitted before the Full Council in December.
Minutes:
DECISION
To
approve the Committee Framework to be submitted before the Full Council in
December.
The report was presented by the Head of Corporate
Support Department who noted that there had been several discussions about the
meetings framework for the future. He explained that the Full Council had
agreed on interim arrangements and that it was intended to present this report
to the Full Council on 2 December 2021.
The Democracy and Language Services Manager noted that
the report was a foundation for the future to ensure a sustainable framework
for the Committees. The Committee was reminded of the period when it was
established which committees should be webcast, namely based on the meetings
that were of most interest to the public and, therefore, the same principle was
used in order to choose the hybrid and virtual only Committees.
It was noted that the Full Council, Cabinet, Planning
Committee and Scrutiny Committee would be held as hybrid meetings. It was
explained that all other Committees and meetings would be virtual only.
The Head of Legal Services added that, statutorily,
there were only two choices, namely meetings that are virtual only, hybrid or a
combination of both. He added that it was a matter of deciding the best
procedure in order to ensure access for the public and to promote democracy
During the discussion the following observations were
made:
·
Members agreed with the
report and it was noted that they understood the logic and the principles.
However, from experience, it was noted that hybrid meetings could be
frustrating for example they could be difficult to chair.
·
It was asked whether
resources would be available for councillors to attend virtually from Council
offices if they happened to be there for other meetings.
·
It was agreed that the
standard of hardware may be high, however, it was noted that the standard of
internet connection right across Gwynedd was not good. A member added that
technical problems could affect the timing of meetings.
·
A comment was added
that the arrangements allowed councillors from areas a considerable distance
from Caernarfon to spend more times on ward matters and less time travelling to
Committees. - Concern was expressed regarding the arrangements of hybrid
meetings in terms of chairing and fairness for members.
·
There was agreement
regarding the good practice of starting meeting earlier so that all members
could ensure they could connect to the technology.
·
It was suggested that meetings
should be started earlier in order to give time to resolve technical problems.
·
It was accepted that
hybrid methods resulted in a wider representation amongst councillors.
·
A question was asked
about the procedure for closed Committees e.g. Licensing
The Head of Corporate Support Department responded to
the above as follows:
·
It had been ensured
that there was provision for members to access an office to be a part of a
virtual meeting
·
The Democracy and
Language Services Manager added that the service was looking at the provision
for new members from 2022.
·
She added that the
Hybrid experience was very different to the old video-conferencing system.
·
It was noted that
initial piloting tests had been successful with the chair joining virtually and
in the chamber.
·
In response to the
question regarding closed Committees, it was noted that the Licensing Committee
had not been identified as one which would be held as hybrid.
·
The Head of Legal
Services added that, statutorily, only two types of meetings existed by now,
namely either hybrid or virtual. He added that every member had a right to
attend remotely.
·
He also added that the
right to attend remotely did not differentiate based on role, therefore a Chair
could attend remotely also.
·
The Committee was thanked
for its support.
Supporting documents: