To submit the North Wales Population
Needs Assessment Consultation Survey Report.
Decision:
To accept the report, noting the observations made
during the meeting.
Minutes:
The
report on the North Wales Population Needs Assessment was submitted, noting
that the needs assessment was drawn up as required in the Social Services and
Well-being (Wales) Act 2014.
The Projects Team Manager, Adults, Health and Well-being reported that a
request had been made to defer this work; it was believed that it was untimely
to complete this during the busy pandemic period; however, the Government was
eager for the work to proceed. It was added that it had been challenging to
complete the work within the timetable. It was noted that the Unit had
committed to undertake more detailed work on the needs of the people of Gwynedd
as this report was a general report across north Wales; it was believed that
the local assessment would be very valuable.
It was added that the full report would be submitted to the Cabinet on
15 February and then to a meeting of the Full Council on 3 March after
receiving Cabinet approval. Here we find the basis to the report which shows
what the public had noted about their needs, as well as the views of
professional officers and third sector organisations. The assessment was based
on a number of consultation exercises across north Wales over the past three
years, and on a questionnaire that was open for individuals and partners to
complete.
The Adults Projects Team Manager wished to obtain the views of the
Committee on which elements to focus on in the Gwynedd assessment; it was
expected that the Gwynedd Population Needs Assessment Report would be ready in
September 2022. It was added that Members were also
welcome to present any feedback after the meeting. Members were given an opportunity to
ask questions and offer observations.
During the
discussion, the following observations were submitted by members:
·
Gratitude
was expressed for a comprehensive and honest report.
·
It was asked how it was intended to work with the
third sector.
·
It was expressed that there were many negative findings
in the assessment which showed discontent; it was questioned whether it
provided a realistic depiction.
·
A
comment was made that the assessment referred to what needed to be improved,
but that there was no reference to a timetable or to when the improvements
would be delivered.
·
More details were sought on mental health,
particularly amongst children, and a question was asked about the length of
waiting lists. It was asked whether the Council could do more to help with the
mental health situation by sharing pamphlets or by promoting where assistance
could be sought.
·
Enquiries were made about the extent of collaboration
between Local Authorities, the Care Sector and the Health Board. It was added
that the report referred to a lack of collaboration and coordination, a
question was asked about how much attention this was given by the Authority.
·
An
observation was made that the pandemic had underlined the shortcomings in the
relationship between the Health Board and Care.
A question was asked about how this assessment could be used to increase
the political pressure on the Government to address the impact of a lack of
Local Government resources on the Health Board.
·
Reference
was made to the Gwynedd Older People Committee that came to an end over the pandemic
period. It was felt that the contact
with the elderly and supporting organisations had been lost. It was believed that consultation was
essential in order to know what the concerns of individuals were.
In response to the above observations and questions from members, it was
noted:
·
That there was a need to collaborate better with the third sector; there
was a need to identify the best way to achieve that by discussing with the
organisations. It was expressed that there was a need to agree on different
ways to provide services that were more specific in order to address needs and
support people.
·
That there was a need to check matters locally within the County in order
to obtain the full and relevant depiction of Gwynedd. This can show different
responses. It was emphasised that there was a need to look at the core matters,
which could mean that the service needed to be transformed; it was added that
this already happened with some elements of service within the Department.
·
That this assessment would feed into the Area Plan for North Wales after it
had been approved by the north Wales Councils. Then, work would commence on how
to address the needs and matters raised.
·
That collaboration happened in the mental health field; a presentation
would be given at the next meeting of this committee held on 17 March, to
provide more details on the developments. In addition, it was noted that work
had commenced to look in detail at some of the services being provided; and
that there would be a commitment to review. In the meantime, the suggestions of
Members were appreciated on how to improve the situation in the short-term. It
was added that there was a need to look in detail at the mental health field
and for it to be re-shaped to meet the needs of the future.
·
That very good collaboration took place
with the Health Board in general, and that good examples of this collaboration
could be seen; it was noted that the development in Penrhos was an
example. It was noted that a change in
systems and culture was difficult in an organisation such as the Council, but
that seeking to coordinate changes jointly with the Health Board was very
challenging. It was believed that it would take time to implement changes,
particularly when processes and arrangements had existed for quite a
while. It was reported that every effort
was being made and that plans that made a difference would be considered; it
was acknowledged that work was to be done here. It was added that creating a
joint needs assessment gave an opportunity to identify problems jointly and an
opportunity to collaborate on the answers.
·
That there was a need to target and focus on specific
fields. It was noted that today's Committee had mentioned problematic issues
such as long waiting lists for mental health assessments for children and the
problem of releasing beds in the Hospitals. More detailed work would need to be
done on these matters and then report back to the Government through the
Regional Partnership Board in order to show what the situation is in Gwynedd.
·
That it was important to identify minor
problems before they increased. This meant that it was essential to receive
information; another element that was as important was the use made of existing
information. It was suggested that
Members had access to useful information and that there was a need to share
this information as well as improve the contact with service providers. It was
suggested that there was no need to carry out further engagement exercises, but
rather draw in and use the information and evidence that already existed. It
was noted that the regeneration team would speak with Community Councils and
take the opportunity to attend meetings in order to receive essential input.
In response to an observation about the
principles of consulting and equality, it was reported that consideration
needed to be given to the socio-economic duty when completing detailed work on
Gwynedd. It was reported that more attention would be given in the Gwynedd
report to these elements and the importance of addressing the needs of this
group was acknowledged.
In
response to a question as to whether there was a record of public gratitude or
appreciation when they were happy with the service received, it was explained
that this information existed. It was
added that there was a need to look at how to advertise these successes.
It was added that the sample from Gwynedd
was relatively small; 50 of the responses came from Gwynedd. This equated to
14% of the contact made within the assessment. It was reiterated that this was
a piece of general work and therefore, there would be a need to consider what
use would be made of findings locally, which will be subject to an awareness of
the area. To close, it was noted that assessment on an individual level was
essential, and to consider whether what mattered to the individual was being
achieved, and if not, why?
RESOLVED:
To accept the report, noting the
observations made during the meeting.
Supporting documents: