To submit
the report of the Cabinet Member for Environment.
Decision:
To agree to publish the Review
Report in Appendix 1 to the report and to present it to Welsh Government, so
that the preparation of the Replacement Plan can commence.
Minutes:
The Chair explained
that a report on the next step of the process of reviewing the Local
Development Plan was being submitted, and that this was not an opportunity to
have a discussion on individual planning policies. He explained, should the Council agree to
proceed to hold a full review of the current plan, then there would be many
opportunities to have input into individual policies and discuss specific
fields at a later date.
The Cabinet Member
for the Environment, Councillor Gareth Griffith, submitted a report seeking
approval from the full Council to publish a Review Report and forward it to
Welsh Government, in order to proceed with the work of preparing an Amended
Plan.
The Assistant Head of
the Environment Department elaborated on the content of the report.
Members were given an
opportunity to make observations and ask questions. The following matters were raised by
individual members:-
·
It was noted that a lot of work had gone into the report, and the Cabinet
Member and officers involved with this were thanked.
·
It was expressed that the phraseology and bureaucracy associated with the
document was immense and incredible, and that the entire planning system was so
complex, so that the majority of people, including elected members, did not
fully understand what was going on. It
was suggested that the latest consultation work could be used as an example of
that, since only 5 members had responded to this all-important
consultation.
·
Disappointment was expressed that officers were not of the opinion that
the one out of almost 80 indicators used to save the Welsh language highlighted
that harm was being caused to the language, and that it appeared, without
Brexit and Covid, that no changes would be mentioned at all.
·
Concern was expressed about what exactly was being submitted, and what
exactly would be returned from Welsh Government, and worse than that, there was
major concern that the Joint Planning Policy Committee would be dealing with
any changes.
·
It was noted, in 2017, that the Joint Planning Policy Committee had given
its approval to bring the plan before the Council, and it had been passed there
by a whisker. All members could do at
the time was approve it or refuse it, and it was not possible to ask for more
time in order for the new members at the time to have an opportunity to discuss
the policies.
·
It was noted that we were seeing, time and time again, that planning
policies were working against the wishes of members to seek to protect our
Welsh communities, and it was concerned, when a response was received from
Welsh Government, that the new members would not understand the importance or
significance of this.
·
A wish to abolish the Joint Planning Policy Committee was expressed, so
that Gwynedd Council implemented this on its own, but it was concerned that
this would not happen, despite all evidence highlighting that there was a major
difference between our wishes in Gwynedd and the wishes of Anglesey.
In response to these
observations, the Cabinet Member noted:-
·
That sessions had been arranged for members, where the Planning Policy
Department submitted information about this part of the review, and should the
Council decide to forward it to Cardiff, the hard work would happen after the
Elections in May.
·
That the work would continue and the Department had declared its
willingness to listen, hold more sessions and consult.
The observations of the
previous speaker were reiterated by other members, who noted:-
·
That members had only been given five days to read this 152-page
document, and it was asked how they had been able to scrutinise and approve the
report, particularly since we were now almost 4 hours into this meeting.
·
That these things were being dumped on us and being pushed through, and
doubtless that the new Council would be told that they would not be able to
change the document as the previous Council had adopted it.
·
That members had been told in 2017 that this was a 'live' document, but
it was subsequently realised that it could not be changed for 3.5 years.
·
That sending this plan to the Government as it was did nothing but
confirm the status quo, and we should think outside the box and be
revolutionary.
·
That a number of the points raised during the public consultation, and
that were at the core of our vision, i.e. the Welsh language, affordable
housing for local people, local market housing, second homes and holiday homes,
tourism and over-tourism, the Well-being Act, etc., was only a part of what was
being submitted to the Government, and it was asked for assurance that
approving the recommendation did not close the door on any full and detailed
discussion on all of these matters.
·
There was concern that all we would be doing by adopting the
recommendation was confirm what had been voted in favour of, by one vote, in
2017, with only some minor changes made.
·
That the question of separating from Anglesey was a question that the new
Council would have to seriously consider.
It was asked whether
approving the recommendation bound the Council to a joint local plan in the
future. In response, it was explained that the current system of collaborating
with Anglesey was not any under discussion at this meeting. Should there be a wish to make a different
decision on that, the right was there, and the Council could discuss that in
the future. It was noted further that
the brief of the Full Council was that they wished to see a full review of the
plan, and for this to happen quickly, and the first step to allow that to
happen would be to publish a Review Report and send it to Welsh Government.
In response to some of the
observations, an individual member noted:-
·
That it was not seen how having a full review of the plan could confirm
the status quo in any way.
·
That he was disappointed with the allegation that elected members did not
understand the planning system, and he had found that insulting.
·
That some were of the opinion that the 3.5 years it took to review the
plan was too much time, and that it would be better to have a way to speed this
up; however, it had to be borne in mind that the Council had passed this as a
principle and had written to the Government to ask for the process to be sped
up, but that the Government had said that this was not possible.
·
That this did not close the door on a discussion, but rather opened it,
and the important points raised during the public consultation would be
discussed in detail over the coming years.
In his closing comments, the Cabinet Member
noted:-
·
Although he accepted the comment about the size of the document, that the
report had been available on the Council's website for some months, but one had
to go and look for it.
·
That he was disappointed that so few members had participated in the
first consultation, and he pleaded on everyone to participate in the second
consultation following the Election.
·
That the observations submitted during the first consultation were being
considered in the second consultation, and therefore, there was no need to
submit the same observations twice.
RESOLVED to agree to
publish the Review Report in Appendix 1 to the report and to present it to
Welsh Government, so that the preparation of the Replacement Plan can commence.
Supporting documents: