To consider
the report and approve the Responsible Investing policy
Decision:
·
To
accept and note the information
·
To
approve the Responsible Investment Policy subject to amending a clause under
the heading 'Reduce the Carbon Emissions of the Fund and the Future Objectives'
"...the Committee has committed to set an aim for the Fund to be
net zero by 2050, supported by a commitment to assess the feasibility of the
Fund reaching net zero 5, 10 or 15 years earlier..."
to
"...the Committee has committed to set an aim for the Fund to be
net zero by 2050, supported by a commitment to assess the feasibility of the
Fund reaching net zero 5, 10 or 20 years earlier..."
Minutes:
The Investment Manager submitted a report, requesting the Committee to
approve a Responsible Investment Policy for the Gwynedd Pension Fund. It was
reported that Responsible Investment had developed into an important and
popular discussion topic over the past year and that the Gwynedd Pension Fund
had taken positive steps in the field, including the release of responsible
investment statements in April and July 2021, which had now been formalised
within the policy.
It was noted that the policy outlined that the aim of the Fund was to secure
strong investment gains over the long-term and protect the interests of
stakeholders, whilst acknowledging that governance, environmental and social
matters could represent a substantial financial risk to stakeholders and
influence the profits and reputation of the Fund. It was reiterated that the
policy also included information about legal guidance, investment beliefs,
engagement and disclosure and reporting and described those principles and
procedures that the fund followed in the field of responsible investment.
Reference was made to the Fund's net zero commitment and highlighted the
consideration of committing to a net target by 2050, but to continuously assess
the possibility of reaching the aim 5, 10, or 15 years earlier. It was
highlighted that there was no wish to set a target without a plan on how to
achieve it, but it was noted that the target of 2050 coincided with the target
of Russell Investments, the Wales Pension Partnership's Investment Management
Solutions Provider. Attention was drawn to the framework developed to support
the ambition that encompassed opportunities, engagement, monitoring and
metrics.
The Fund's Director reiterated that although no target had been set
previously that there was a commitment to be net zero and reasonable steps
taken to seek to achieve this had been actioned, but that there was now an
expectation to set a target and formalise the position.
The policy had been submitted to the Pension Board for observations on 7
March 2022. It was noted that their proposals had been incorporated in the
policy.
Thanks were expressed
for the report.
Members were given an opportunity to ask questions.
In response to a question regarding the implications of the Sanctions
Measure from the Westminster Government following the Russian attacks in
Ukraine, it appeared that the Westminster Government wished to restrict funds
from acting politically. Although some decisions had been challenged in the
past, it appeared that the Government had an intention to set a policy;
however, it was considered that this could vary, subject to the government that
was in power at the time. He highlighted that the 'fiduciary duty' currently
managed the restrictions and in accordance with the Pension Board's suggestion,
a reference to this had been included in the Policy.
In the context of Russia and Ukraine, it was highlighted that the Committee
held the same view, the powers and confidence to influence the portfolio by
sharing concern about the situation with Scheme members, releasing a statement
and by noting that there was no risk of substantial financial harm to the Fund
from Russian investments (less than 1%). In relation to other issues, such as
weapons, there was no common view held amongst the majority of the Fund's
members, and identifying the size of investments was challenging. It was
accepted that this was difficult, and there was a need to be comfortable with
the situation before proceeding, since the fiduciary duty applied here.
In response to comments about setting a net zero target and of the
possibility of reaching the target by 2050, the Chair highlighted that Welsh
Government had made a statement that the public sector in Wales should be
carbon neutral by 2030. At a meeting of the Gwynedd Council Cabinet on 3 March
2022, the Climate and Nature Emergency Plan 2022-2030 was approved, adopted and
implemented. This plan would outline the actions to be taken by the Council to
reach the aim of being a net zero carbon Council by 2030. In order to reconcile
this ambition with the Responsible Investment Policy, it was suggested that the
timetable be adapted so that there is an ambition to reach the aim of being net
zero by 2030.
The Investment Manager highlighted that the Wales Pension Partnership had
commissioned Robeco to engage with the fund's asset
managers in relation to voting activity on climate-related issues, and to
engage with the companies in which the WPP invested, to influence and improve
their activities and behaviours on climate-related matters. It was reiterated
that further measures were to be adopted, as well as 'TCFD' (Taskforce on
Climate-related Financial Disclosures) requirements. Reference was made to the
appendix to the policy - 'Monitoring Gwynedd Pension Fund Asset Managers',
which was a live document that would keep record of the developments in the
responsible investment field that all asset managers had delivered.
It was proposed and seconded to approve the Policy, subject to amending the
timetable so that the ambition was to reach the aim of being net zero by 2030, if
possible.
RESOLVED
·
To accept and note the information
·
To approve the Responsible Investment Policy subject to amending a clause under the heading 'Reduce the Carbon Emissions of the Fund and the Future Objectives'
"...the Committee has committed to set an aim for
the Fund to be net zero by
2050, supported by a commitment
to assess the feasibility
of the Fund reaching net zero 5, 10 or 15 years earlier..."
to
"...the Committee has committed to set an aim for
the Fund to be net zero by
2050, supported by a commitment
to assess the feasibility
of the Fund reaching net zero 5, 10 or 20 years earlier..."
The Chair noted that questions from the public had been submitted to the
Committee and responses were provided to those questions from the Fund's Director:
1.
Bearing in mind the
volatile nature of fossil fuel investments in light of the Russian war, the
recent IPCC report, and the views of experts that engaging with shareholders
leads to taking rather than action, will the committee now commit to divest from
all assets relating to fossil fuels in the shortest possible period of
time? I am calling for divestment
within 2 years.
It was noted that an ambitious Responsible Investment Policy had now been adopted
and that there was substantial evidence of the steps that the Fund has already
taken to act. As the Fund's assets are invested globally, and across a number
of sectors, reducing the Fund's carbon emissions will be more challenging than
it would be for a single organisation. Therefore, it will not be possible to
commit to respond sooner due to the fiduciary duty.
2.
Considering the
substantial amount of evidence that shows that engagement is not an effective
tool to ensure that companies withdraw from fossil fuel, particularly within
the required time-scales, will the Gwynedd Pension Fund instead focus its
efforts on divestment?
We underlined by referring to examples in the appendix to the Responsible
Investment Policy that monitors the progress of Gwynedd Pension Fund assets
that divestment is already being implemented, where possible, with due
attention given to the fiduciary duty and other legal conditions.
The views of the Committee and officers that engagement is an essential
tool were confirmed, and it was elaborated that the Wales Pension Partnership
had commissioned Robeco to engage with managers and
the companies with whom we invest to influence and improve their activities and
conduct on climate-related matters, as well as attempt to influence those
companies and encourage them to move from fossil fuels to renewable energy.
3.
Could you provide an
update on: (a) how much money has the Gwynedd Pension Fund currently invested
in fossil fuel related assets and (b) the development of the fund's responsible
investment policy?
(a) We confirmed that the specific 'TCFD' reporting requirements for
LGPS funds will be introduced over the coming year, and in the meantime, there
is no acknowledged method in place for regular reporting.
(b) It was elaborated that an ambitious Responsible Investment Policy
had now been adopted.
4.
Does the Committee
acknowledge that the war in Ukraine, the uncertainty regarding the supplies of
oil and gas and the new campaign to develop renewable energy is highlighting
the uncertain nature of fossil fuel investments?
It has been noted that it is not the war alone that has highlighted this
uncertainty; the Committee has already considered the uncertain nature of
fossil fuel investments, and that relevant steps have already been taken, as
outlined in the Responsible Investment Policy and the appendix that monitors
progress.
5.
Would you consider a
strategy of listing the most polluting companies from your investment portfolio
and joining the NZAOA (United Nations Assembly - Net Zero Asset Owner
Alliance)?
That the Gwynedd Fund was receiving advice and acting in accordance with
that advice. It was noted that there was no intention to join the NZAOA at
present, but that there was a willingness to look into their features and share
information with the Wales Pension Partnership, should that be beneficial.
The public's interest in the subject was appreciated and they were
encouraged to submit their questions earlier so that officers and members had
an opportunity to prepare full responses.
Supporting documents: