Construction of affordable dwelling
LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor
Aled Wyn Jones
Decision:
DECISION:
To approve the application with a 106 agreement
Conditions:
5 years, in accordance with the plans, land drainage, landscaping,
materials and finishes, Welsh name
Minutes:
Construction of affordable dwelling
a)
The
Assistant Head of Environment Department submitted his report after referring
the Committee's decision on 21-03-22 to a cooling-off period. A decision on the application had been deferred
to enable the applicant to prove that he was in need and eligible for an
affordable home. The purpose of reporting back to the Committee was to
highlight the planning policy issues, the possible risks and the possible
options for the Committee before it reached a final decision on the
application.
It was highlighted that the applicants had been
re-assessed based on new comprehensive financial information that had been
received, that included a Red Book Valuation, valuation of their current house
and information regarding their mortgage and likely equity. A copy of Tai Teg's response was received from the applicant, confirming
that they had assessed the application against their criteria. Their
application was refused as it was considered that their current property was
suitable for the family's size, affordable and that they did not have any
specific needs. As a result, the need for an affordable house had not been
fully proven and that the LPA's reason for refusal, 'The applicants have not proven a need for affordable housing local
need, therefore the proposal is contrary to criteria 1 and 7 of Policies TAI 6,
Tai 15 and PS 17 of the Anglesey and Gwynedd Joint Local Development Plan and
the requirements of the Supplementary Planning Guidance: Affordable Housing
(2019)' remained.
It was appreciated that the applicant was experiencing
anti-social issues at their existing property and wished to move, however, in
accordance with Tai Teg's assessment, the applicants'
existing house was of an affordable size and price and was fit-for-purpose.
This was deemed the applicants' 'wish' rather than a 'need' and that personal
matters between neighbours were not relevant planning matters. The committee
should not give weight to this when considering the application.
In the context of the affordability of the proposed house, it was noted
that £315,000 was the open market price of the house. It was reported that the
Strategic Housing Unit had not responded to confirm the affordability element
or the likely discount percentage that would be reasonable for a new single
intermediate property, but it was suggested that a discount of approximately
50% would be needed to make the price affordable for an intermediate property
to £157,000. Reference was made to increasing house prices and a concern that
the price of the property / land could increase significantly in the future to
a level where it could be argued that the property would not be affordable
whatever the discount, and that an application may be submitted to lift the 106
Agreement. It was reiterated that the LDP only supported proposals for
affordable units where it could be ensured that they remained affordable in
perpetuity, but with the proposal in question, in such a location with coastal
views that could influence the price of the house in future, no guarantees
could be given that the house would remain affordable in future.
The risks to the Council of approving the application,
along with the options available to the Committee, were highlighted. The
officers noted clearly that the features of the application had been thoroughly
assessed by the Council's officers, who firmly recommended that the application
be refused as the proposal did not comply with the requirements of the Gwynedd
and Anglesey Joint Local Development Plan's adopted policies, local and
national guidance and national planning policies.
b)
Taking
advantage of the right to speak, the Local Member made the following points:
·
That the
application was unique.
·
That the family
currently lived in Nefyn under very difficult
circumstances, and suffered from anti-social attacks.
·
That their
current house was unsuitable - it did not meet their needs anymore - no parking
space, kitchen was too small.
·
The applicant
had responded and complied with the Officers' requests by submitting additional
reports and information.
·
The Committee
had supported the application at committee meetings in December 2021 and March
2022.
·
Reference was
made to e-mails received from Tai Teg where it was
noted that the affordability of each application would be considered on a case
by case basis.
·
Their current
home was a former Council House with a 157 condition - this restricted who
could live there.
·
The Housing
Department had made an offer on the house and the applicant had accepted the
offer - the house would therefore be released for another local family.
·
Gwynedd's
Housing Strategy noted the need for Gwynedd residents to have access to
suitable homes of a high standard that would improve their quality of life -
the application addressed this.
·
Many had taken
the time to write in to support the application - no objections.
·
We had to
respond positively to local residents - local people must be supported.
b) It
was proposed and seconded to approve the application with a 106 agreement.
c) During
the ensuing discussion, the following observations were made by a member:
·
That the
application was unique.
·
A house in Nefyn would be released for local people.
RESOLVED: To approve the application with a 106
agreement.
Conditions:
Five years, in accordance with the plans, land
drainage, landscaping, materials and finishes, Welsh name.
Supporting documents: