Proposed upgrading of facilities
comprising siting 10 touring units and 6 Glamping Pods in lieu of 25 tents
authories via Lawful Use Certificate C12/1554/44/TC
LOCAL
MEMBER: Councillor Gwilym Jones
Decision:
DECISION:
To delegate powers to
the Planning Manager to approve the application, subject to the following
conditions:
1.
Time.
2.
In accordance with the plans.
3.
Restrict the number of touring units to 10 touring
units, 6 pods and 50 tents.
4.
Holiday use only and keep a register.
5.
Holiday season - 1 March to 31 October.
6.
Pods to be moved to a storage site shown on the plan
between 1 November and 29 February.
7.
Complete the landscaping work in the first planting
season.
8.
In accordance with the recommendations of the Ecology
Report.
·
Notes: Attention is drawn to the observations of the
Caravan Licensing Officer
·
Notes: Attention is drawn to the observations of
Natural Resources Wales regarding having a flood plan in place.
Minutes:
Upgrade facilities including the installation of 10 touring units and 6
glamping pods to replace 25 tents authorised by a Lawful Use Certificate
C12/1554/44/TC
Attention was drawn to the
late observations form.
a) The Planning Manager highlighted that this was a full
application to upgrade facilities including the installation of 10 touring
units and 6 glamping pods to replace 25 tents authorised by a Lawful Use
Certificate C12/1554/44/TC at Tyddyn Adi site, Morfa Bychan. The work would also include landscaping between the
caravan pitches and landscaping to enclose the pod sites.
Attention was drawn to the observations of
the Community Council which had objected to the application as the glamping
pods appeared to be a permanent feature. It was reported that additional
information had been received from the applicant, noting that the pods were
one-room and were mobile and could be stored away at the end of the season.
Reference was made to policy TWR 5 of the LDP which
permits proposals to develop new touring caravan sites and temporary
alternative camping accommodation provided they conform to all the criteria
noted. It was considered that the design, layout and appearance of the proposal
was of an acceptable quality and that it was located in an unobtrusive location
that was well hidden by the existing landscape features. It was not believed
that exchanging the units from tents to caravans and pods would cause
substantial harm to the visual quality of the landscape in this site.
It was highlighted that the site plan noted that it
was not intended to install hard standings for the units and the Planning
Statement stated that it was not intended to connect the pods to the drainage
system. The pods will be moved to a storage site over the winter, therefore,
the physical connection to the ground will be restricted. Shower and toilet blocks already exist on the site, and the users of the proposed
caravans and pods use the existing provision. There is no intention to build a
new building as a part of the application.
In the context of the visual amenities, it was noted
that the site lies in a rural location. It was considered that the site on the
whole was well screened from the vast majority of viewpoints, with weak points
here and there in the landscape. It was reiterated that the site was visible
from the public footpath but that the plan showed a proposal to landscape with
a low density layout, open spaces and rows of hedges
within the site.
Reference was made to the fact that a section of the
field was located within flood zone C2 and should it be a new development, it
would be contrary to policy. However, considering the fall-back position of the
site, which already had permission for 75 tents, exchanging the units would not
be contrary to policy as it would not increase the risk in this case. It could
be argued, due to the reduced numbers, that the risk would reduce. Considering that only a small section of the
field is located within a C2 flood zone and the situation with the existing
permission of the site, it is concluded that the proposal would not exacerbate
or increase the flood risk in this case. Therefore, it was suggested that the
fall-back position meant that the proposal was not contrary to policy TAN 15
and policy PS 6 of the LDP, with an advisory note included to follow the advice
of NRW's observations.
Although there was no need to submit a statement on
how it was expected for Welsh language considerations to be incorporated into
the development, it was noted that the applicant had submitted a language
statement on how they intend to give consideration to
the Welsh language.
Having considered all material planning matters,
including local and national policies and guidance, as well as the observations
received, it was considered that the proposal was acceptable and that it would
not have a substantial harmful impact on the landscape, the amenities of the
neighbourhood or road safety.
b) Taking advantage of the right to speak, the Local
Member made the following points:
·
That he was supportive of the development.
·
Welcomed more space for touring units.
·
That the officer's
response to the Community Council's observations about the pods was acceptable.
c) It was proposed and
seconded to approve the application.
RESOLVED:
To delegate powers to the Planning Manager to
approve the application, subject to the following conditions:
1. Time
2. In
accordance with the plans.
3. Restrict the number of touring units to 10 touring units, 6
pods and 50 tents.
4. Holiday
use only and keep a register.
5. Holiday
season - 1 March to 31 October
6. Pods to be moved to a storage site shown on the plan between
1 November and 29 February.
7. Complete
the landscaping work in the first planting season.
8. In
accordance with the recommendations of the Ecology Report
• Notes: Attention is drawn to the observations of the
Caravan Licensing Officer
• Notes: Attention is drawn to the observations of Natural
Resources Wales regarding having a flood plan in place.
Supporting documents: