(a) To consider any questions from members of
the public, the appropriate notice for which have been given under Section 4.18
of the Constitution.
Question by Mr Paul D. Gill (address
provided in accordance with the requirements of the Constitution)
“Why is the Council imposing an increase in the Council Tax Premium in an area which is very dependent on the tourist industry and tourist spending locally without independent research and a report thereon to the Council on the effect of such a policy on the local economy bearing in mind that the imposition of the increase will reduce local tourist expenditure putting local jobs and businesses in jeopardy especially at a time of high inflation and energy bills?
(b) To consider any questions from elected
members, the appropriate notice for which have been given under Section 4.19 of
the Constitution.
Minutes:
(The Cabinet Members' written responses to the questions had been
published in advance.)
(A)
A question from a Member of the public
Question from Mr Paul D.Gill (address provided in
accordance with the
requirements of the Constitution)
Why is the
Council imposing an increase in the Council Tax Premium in an area which is
very dependent on the tourist industry and tourist spending locally without
independent research and a report thereon to the Council on the effect of such
a policy on the local economy bearing in mind that the imposition of the
increase will reduce local tourist expenditure putting local jobs and
businesses in jeopardy especially at a time of high inflation and energy bills?
Response by the Cabinet Member for Finance,
Councillor Ioan Thomas
By empowering councils to charge a Premium on Council Tax for second
homes and long-term empty dwellings, the Welsh Government has published
statutory guidance for the administration of the Premium, namely the Guidance
on the Implementation of the Council Tax Premiums on Long-Term Empty Homes and
Second Homes in Wales.
The Statutory Guidance outline the kind of factors that can be helpful
for a local authority to consider when proposing the introduction of a Premium.
Each time Cabinet and the full Council considers the Premium it considers this
guidance.
As the Statutory Guidance sets out, the discretion given to local
authorities to charge a premium is intended to be a tool to help local
authorities to bring long-term empty homes back into use to provide safe,
secure and affordable homes, and support local authorities in increasing the supply
of affordable housing and enhancing the sustainability of local communities.
The aim of the Premium is to assist the housing field, and the
commitment of the Housing Action Plan is evidence of this.
The premium is a sincere attempt of trying to strike a fair balance
between the impact of second homes and empty properties on our communities and
maintaining the visitor economy. The
Cabinet is well aware of the importance of the tourism industry. On the other hand, we must have sustainable
tourism and that will be the subject of a separate study in due course. But most of all, we believe that the basis of
a sound economy is an economy where the people of Gwynedd have homes and
contribute to the local economy. We can't ignore a situation where it is estimated
that 1,400 individuals will have presented themselves as homeless by the end of
this year – double the number presenting before Covid-19. As a Council we will be accommodating over
600 people in temporary accommodation this year, where the figure was around
200 before the Covid-19 period. This is
not the foundation of a robust, sustainable economy.
Raising and increasing the premium is not an
easy matter and Cyngor Gwynedd has never claimed it is a simple choice. Members
are required to weigh-up a number of factors before reaching a decision today,
including the impact of the premium on the visitor economy. This is one of the
messages coming from the outcome of the public consultation and which is
addressed in the studies that are referenced in the comprehensive report
members will consider today.
Supplementary Question from Mr Paul
D.Gill
What do you say to
local people who have local businesses, like some of the people here today,
many of whom will face significant detriment to those businesses, including the
like of the Ffestiniog and Welsh Highland Railways, as part of the UNESCO World
Heritage Site? If you impose any further premium you must be the only council
anywhere that would endanger the existence of part of the World Heritage Site. There are some businesses that will even face
bankruptcy as a direct result of the further premium. And please don't tell me
that it wouldn't do that, because it will, as the Council would know if it had
undertaken a proper economic assessment.
Response – Cabinet Member for Finance,
Councillor Ioan Thomas
As a member of the Council who represents a ward
in Caernarfon, which is a World Heritage Site, I am very aware of the
importance of securing and safeguarding this status. I accept that it is possible
that some businesses will be affected, however I think that you are too extreme
when you talk of companies becoming bankrupt etc., and I think that this
increase is very reasonable.
(B)
Questions by Elected Members
(1)
A question by Councillor Delyth Lloyd
Griffiths
Precisely what percentage of the food that is
used by the Council in schools, care settings and other centres, is grown or
processed in Gwynedd? Since there is a
need to protect the local food chain because of current global costs and problems,
I ask the Cabinet Member to ensure that all of the food purchased is sourced
locally or processed locally. Accepting that the Council buys a high percentage
of food from local distributors, can I have a guarantee that the food
originates from Gwynedd or nearby counties?
Response – Cabinet
Member for Corporate Support, Councillor Menna Jones
1.
The
Council held a tendering process in autumn 2019 to establish contracts for
supplying and distributing food to the Schools and Residential Homes of Cyngor
Gwynedd.
2.
As
part of the work to encourage small providers to compete, the contract was
split into food categories and geographical areas within Gwynedd. In addition, early engagement was carried
out with the market (18 months prior to the tender being published) and
one-to-one tendering support was provided through Business Wales.
3.
Following
this, we see that 71% of the produce we buy is distributed by companies who are
based in Gwynedd. Following efforts by our wholesalers to source local and
Welsh produce wherever possible, we see that 100% of the cheese we buy is
produced in Gwynedd, and we source 40% of the potatoes we need from Gwynedd.
100% of the Beef, 80% of the Lamb and 100% of the Milk originates from Wales.
4.
In
terms of the source of all food that is supplied by our wholesalers, it is not
possible to provide this information to the level of detail requested by the
Member at present. This is because of the substantial range of ingredients and
foods that are supplied and also the nature of the supply chain.
5.
It
must also be acknowledged that buying produce from Gwynedd is difficult, and
the main barriers to this include:
·
The
produce is not available locally i.e. the climate and landscape in Gwynedd and
Wales limit what can be produced.
·
Local
producers cannot provide what is needed in the required quantities, or the
price is not competitive.
·
With
regard to meat specifically, in order for the slaughter-houses to agree to
provide the resource to guarantee that the meat comes from Gwynedd, we would be
required to buy large amounts and pay a substantial premium for the meat.
·
The
majority of milk from Gwynedd farms goes to South Caernarfon Creameries to make
cheese and other dairy products, they do not sell milk.
·
The
supply chain for many of the produce required is international and not local.
·
It
must also be recognised that we cannot insist that the produce must originate
from Gwynedd as this is contrary to national legal regulations.
6.
To
try and increase the proportion of produce from Gwynedd and Wales, the Council:
·
works
with and through our wholesalers with organisations such as the NFU, Young
Farmers, Larder Cymru and others to raise awareness of opportunities that are
relevant to the public sector.
·
reviews
the menu in schools to see whether changes can be made which would promote more
Welsh produce.
·
continuously
reviews our purchasing arrangements in order to give local suppliers the best
chance to compete in the market.
7.
The
Council will re-tender the Food Contract in the autumn of 2023, and we will
continue to support the local market in order to encourage local suppliers to
compete and win contracts.
Supplementary Question by Councillor Delyth Lloyd Griffiths
I ask the Cabinet Member to look into the clause 'It must also be
recognised that we cannot insist that the produce must originate from Gwynedd
as this is contrary to national legal regulations' and look if this
obstacle is something we can overcome in the future in order to buy more
locally.
Response – Cabinet
Member for Corporate Support, Councillor Menna Jones
Procurement regulations are in place to ensure
free and fair competition for every applicant. This means that we cannot insist
that produce must originate from a specific location or ask for a specific
brand as this would restrict competition and possibly give unfair advantage to
specific providers. Although we cannot insist that produce originates from
Gwynedd, we are in the process of trialling procurement processes that will
award the efforts of producers to maximise the local, economic, social and
environmental benefits associated with the contract for the local area, and I
will be looking into this further.
(2) Question from Councillor Richard Glyn Roberts
What arrangements have been made to prepare a thorough
assessment of the linguistic impact of increasing the council tax premium, in
line with paragraph 10.5 of the Gwynedd Language Policy, and in particular the
impact on 'the numbers or percentage of Welsh speakers in communities'?
Response – Cabinet Member for Finance,
Councillor Ioan Thomas
My colleagues will be aware that they need to consider the report on the
Council Tax Premium later this afternoon, in item 8 on the meeting agenda.
The report that will be presented to you extends to 30 pages, contains
three appendices, and has links to a number of studies. Some of these studies
have been carried out by external bodies or individuals, others have been
carried out in-house by the Council. Taken together these studies consider the
impact of the Premium on local communities, as well as the impact of second
homes and empty properties on these communities. There is clear evidence in the report
presented that the impact of the Premium, second homes and empty properties on
the language has been addressed at every stage.
I note that not all of the studies referred to
in the report reach the same conclusion about the impact of different policies
on the language, but we take note of the risks highlighted in them all,
particularly those relating to the Welsh language. No separate academic study has been
commissioned while preparing the report.
I emphasise that consideration of the messages
of these studies, and the risks highlighted in them to the Welsh language and
to our communities, is a key part of Cabinet's consideration not to recommend a
Premium above 150% on second homes at this time, although the Act allows for a
higher Premium to be charged.
In the public consultation, the views of respondents was that raising
the Premium would not have an impact on the language.
The Council has a Housing Action Plan in place, which is specifically
intended to introduce measures to strengthen Gwynedd's communities and make the
Housing Strategy a reality. Stable,
sustainable communities alongside with other measures will undoubtedly be a
step in our vision to strengthen the use of Welsh in our communities.
The Equality Impact Assessment being presented
with today's report reminds us that a number of characteristics and aspects as
well as socio-economic impact need to be considered when reaching a policy
decision, as well as the impact on the Language.
Supplementary Question from Councillor Richard Glyn Roberts
Does the Cabinet Member really think that three sentences in an equality
impact assessment of 15 pages equates to a language impact assessment?
Response – Cabinet
Member for Finance, Councillor Ioan Thomas
As I have mentioned before, there are a number of studies, that include
the impact on the Welsh language.
Supporting documents: