Proposed extension to slate extraction operations
LOCAL
MEMBER: Councillor Beca Roberts
Decision:
DECISION: To delegate powers to the Assistant Head of the Environment Department
to approve the application, with conditions relating to the following:
1. Duration of working period 31/12/2035 and restoration up to 31/12/2037
to coincide with terms of overarching planning permission.
2. Permitted activities and compliance with submitted details/plans.
3. Mark boundary of site and mineral extraction zones.
4. Revoke Part 19 and 21 rights of the General Permitted Development Order
for fixed plant or machinery, buildings and structures and mineral waste.
5. Working Hours.
6. Method of working and blast limitations;
7. Detailed Restoration Plan
8. Control of external lighting.
9. Control of daytime and night time noise limitations.
10. Control of fugitive dust.
11. Five yearly review of operations.
12. Soils and restoration media storage.
13. Controls on soil stripping and vegetation clearance.
14. Updated tipping and waste (slate, soils etc.) scheme.
15. Long-term monitoring plan of the leat.
16. Protection of nesting birds.
17. Lichen management plan.
18. Reptiles protection measures.
19. Restrict access of livestock to restored areas.
20. Monitoring of invasive species.
21. Detailed restoration scheme at least 12 months prior to cessation of
operations.
22. Archaeological recording and mitigation.
Minutes:
Application for extension
to slate extraction operation
Attention was drawn to the
late observations form.
a) The Senior Planning Officer - Minerals, highlighted
that this was an application for a side extension to the working area of
Penrhyn Quarry. It was explained that the quarry was located to the south of
the town of Bethesda, with vehicular access along a private road leading off
the B4409, a Class 2 public road, at Pont y Tŵr;
that the application site was located immediately adjacent to the south-western
corner of the existing rock face, and within the boundary of the existing
planning consent for a side extension (reference C12/0874/16/MW), and a Review
of Old Minerals Consent under the Environment Act 1995 (ROMP) (permission
number C16/1164/16/MW) for the whole quarry approved in 2017.
It was noted that the proposed extension would include
around 1.6ha of land, with the application site including a total of 2.26ha
(that would also include keeping the boundaries and the stream in the
south-east). It is proposed to work the extended excavation area in the same
manner as the existing workings agreed under ROMP 2017 and application
C12/0874/16/MW, including waste tipping, stockpiling, producing roof slates,
etc.
The need for the extension arises as a result of a
vertical dolerite dyke that crosses the south-western existing rock face. Slate
within 25m of this dyke are seriously damaged to the degree where it is not
possible to obtain any material to work from them, which leads to the loss of
around 1.11 tonnes of the best slate. The proposed extension would release
around 250,000 tonnes of purple roofing slate and 1.9 million tonnes of
red/blue decorative slate, therefore ensuring that there is no deficit in the
existing mineral reserve, and maintaining the land bank in accordance with the
requirements of Strategic Policy 22: Minerals and MWYN 3 of the JLDP.
In the context of the visual amenities and the
landscape, it was noted that the area immediately surrounding the site included
a number of sensitive land designations, i.e. Snowdonia National Park, Welsh
Slate Area World Heritage Site, Dyffryn Ogwen
Landscape of Outstanding Historic Interest (LOHI), Special Landscape Area of
the North Western Fringes of Snowdonia.
Further afield were the Anglesey Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
(AONB), Faenol and Penrhyn Castle Historic Parks and
Gardens, Menai and Bangor Mountain SLA and the Dinorwig Landscape of Outstanding Historic Interest - all
have been identified within the Assessment of Impact on the Landscape and
Visual Impact.
Considering the scale of the development, it was
likely that it would be difficult to differentiate the extension site from the
existing excavation site and workings at the quarry from further away. The LVIA
concludes that any prominent impacts on the landscape will be restricted to
areas immediately adjacent to the site; specifically Gwaun Gynfi and Elidir Fach.
The existing restoration
strategy for the whole site is a condition in the ROMP (C16/1164/16/MW) and it
is proposed to incorporate the restoration work for the proposed extension in
the broader plan. Although a restoration
plan exists for the site, NRW noted that they would recommend introducing a
detailed restoration plan before the end of the quarrying work. The MPA
considers that this is a reasonable addition to the application (along with
application C22/0327/16/AC), and that it would ensure that the whole site is
restored in the most effective manner. To this end, it was not considered that
the proposal would have a substantial impact on the character of the area's
landscape, considering the proposal's proximity to the existing and historic
quarry works along with the landscape in which it is located. Therefore, the
proposal complies with the requirements of planning policies PCYFF 3, PCYFF 4
and MWYN 9 of the JLDP.
In the context of noise and
vibration, the potential noise from the proposed works was measured against the
noise conditions of the existing planning permission. It was considered that
the situation could be managed effectively through mitigation measures and
appropriate conditions. It was reiterated that a condition would demand that
the developer continued with the current procedure of monitoring dust and the
condition of the atmosphere, implemented mitigation steps to keep the dust
down, and kept a log of dust-related complaints. With this condition, it was
considered that the proposal complied with the relevant policies - MWYN 3 and
PCYFF 2 of the LDP.
In the context of traffic
matters, public rights of way and common land, it was reported that the
proposal did not include an intention to increase the number of HGV movements
from the site and no observations had been received from the Council's
Transportation Unit (although comments on a sister-application C22/0327/16/AC
had been submitted noting no objection since there would not be any proposed
increase in traffic movements from the site).
When discussing hydrology and hydro-geology matters,
attention was drawn to the interception leat that had
been implemented as a part of the existing extension. It was explained that the
leat ran along the boundary of the quarry void and
the boundary of the proposed extension, and captured surface water and
re-directed it to the Gwaun Gynfi
wetland and peat-land. This made good for the previous loss of hydro-geology
catchment area from previous applications to extend, and maintained a water
source for the wetland. It was concluded that there was no greater impact on
hydro-geology features from the proposed extension, alongside the existing
quarrying, provided that the recommended mitigation and monitoring measures
were implemented.
A consultation was
undertaken with the Local Authority's Biodiversity Unit and they confirmed that
they did not have any objection to the development and that they agreed with
the mitigation measures recommended and the inclusion of appropriate
conditions.
In the context of
archaeology and cultural heritage matters, reference was made to a
post-medieval cellular sheep pen within the area of the proposed extension and
that a programme of recording and controlled demolition was undertaken prior to
the development of the extension. In addition, it was noted that CADW and the
Gwynedd Archaeological Planning Service had confirmed that they did not have
any objection to the proposed work and that they agreed with the summary of the
chapter on Cultural Heritage in the Environmental Statement. The chapter
concluded that the proposals did not have any impact on the World Heritage Site
designation nor on its Outstanding General Value and it would have a small or
very small indirect visual impact on the Historic Landscape Area.
It was reported that
Section 1 (a) strategic policy PS 1 'The Welsh Language and Culture', noting
that a Welsh Language Statement will need to be provided with an offer for
'Retail, industrial or commercial development that employs more than 50
employees and/or with a surface area of 1,000 m.sq.
or more. In response to this need, the applicant provided a language statement
which concluded that the quarry had a long-established workforce with a
substantial number of people who could speak Welsh or possessed Welsh language
skills. As the intention of the proposed extension was to help maintain the
operations of the quarry, it was unlikely that the company needed to employ
more workers and it would sustain the existing workforce.
It was considered that the
proposed development complied with all relevant planning policies and
considerations and it was recommended that the planning application should be
approved with appropriate conditions.
b)
Taking advantage of the right to speak, the applicant noted the
following observations:
·
That he was
thankful of the opportunity to explain the need for an extension
·
That the extension responded to the impact on a geological anomaly that
would allow the company to reach suitable products
·
That Welsh slate was unique
·
That
approving an extension would lead to a reduction in the waiting list for
material
·
That the company was well-established
·
That the extension would secure employment for 115 until 2035
c)
The Chair noted that Cllr Beca Roberts (Local Member) had noted in an
e-mail that she was in favour of the proposal
ch) It was proposed and seconded to approve the application
d)
During the ensuing discussion, the following observations were made by
Members:
·
That the quarry was important to the local economy
·
Protected jobs in the area
RESOLVED: To delegate
powers to the Head of the Environment Department to approve the application,
with conditions relating to the following:
1. Duration of working period 31/12/2035 and restoration up to
31/12/2037 to coincide with terms of overarching planning permission.
2. Permitted activities and compliance with submitted
details/plans.
3. Mark
boundary of site and mineral extraction zones.
4. Revoke Part 19 and 21 rights of the General Permitted
Development Order for fixed plant or machinery, buildings and structures and
mineral waste.
5. Working
Hours.
6. Method
of working and blast limitations.
7. Detailed
Restoration Plan.
8. Control
of external lighting.
9. Control
of daytime and night time noise limitations.
10. Control
of fugitive dust.
11. Five
yearly review of operations.
12. Soils
and restoration media storage.
13. Controls on soil stripping and vegetation
clearance.
14. Updated tipping and waste
(slate, soils etc.) scheme.
15. Long-term monitoring plan of the
leat.
16. Protection
of nesting birds.
17. Lichen
management plan.
18. Reptiles
protection measures.
19. Restrict
access of livestock to restored areas.
20. Monitoring
of invasive species.
21. Detailed restoration scheme at least 12 months prior to
cessation of operations.
22. Archaeological
recording and mitigation.
Supporting documents: