Bonna Pizza, 23 Holyhead Rd, Bangor LL57 2EU
To consider the application
Decision:
To approve
the application in accordance with the comments of the Police, and requirements of the Licensing Act 2003.
Minutes:
Bona Pizza, 23 Holyhead Road, Bangor
The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting.
a)
The Licensing Department's Report
The Licensing Manager highlighted that the Local Members had not presented any observations, however they were
eager to address the Sub-committee should all the parties be in agreement.
In response, the applicant's representative noted that they agreed
to an address from the Local Members, however they wanted
to note that a specific timetable had been set to present observations.
The Licensing Manager's report was submitted giving details of the application for a premises licence for a hot food
takeaway shop selling pizza, kebabs, burgers and chips; the application had been submitted in relation
to late night refreshment on and off site.
It was noted that
the Licensing Authority Officers had sufficient evidence that the application had been submitted in accordance
with the requirements of
the Licensing Act 2003 and
the relevant regulations. Reference was made to the measures recommended by the applicant to promote the licensing objectives, and it was highlighted that these measures
would be included on the licence.
Attention was drawn to the responses received during the consultation period. It was noted that objections had been received to the application from members of the public on the grounds of public nuisance, specifically the likely late-night noise from customers, as well as odour nuisance. It was also noted that a petition
had been received referring to concerns in relation to the Licensing Objectives of Preventing Public Nuisance and Public
Safety. It was highlighted that North Wales Police recommended that CCTV conditions should be included on the licence as well as ensuring that staff receive training in relation
to all aspects of the Licensing
Act. The Fire and Rescue
Service did not object to the application.
It was recommended
that the Committee should approve the application in accordance with Police observations and the requirements of the Licensing Act 2003.
b)
In considering the application, the following procedure was followed:-
·
Members of the Sub-committee
were given an opportunity to ask questions of the Council’s representative.
·
At the Chair’s discretion, the applicant or his representative may ask questions to the Council’s representative.
·
The applicant and / or his representative were invited to expand on the application
and to call witnesses
·
Members of the sub-committee
were given the opportunity to ask questions of the applicant and / or his representative.
·
At the Chair's discretion, the Council’s representative may ask questions to the applicant or his representative.
·
Every Consultee was given an invitation
to support any written observations.
·
The Council’s representative and the applicant and / or his representative were given the opportunity to summarise their case.
In response to a question regarding the 'need' for the property to be open until 3:30am, the Licensing Manager noted that the Bangor Uchaf area was a late licensed area - this premises would
correspond to the licensing
hours of two other takeaway premises in the area.
Elaborating on the application, the applicant's representative noted:
·
That she gave assurance that both applicants
had extensive experience of
working in the food industry (period of 25 years)
·
The proposed opening hours were
in-keeping with the hours of the other two premises in
the same area together with a 24-hour convenience store
·
An additional half hour was required
on Monday and Wednesday evenings
as these were the main student nights out and they
wished to take advantage of this
·
Albert Street was some distance from
the premises and therefore it would not have a direct impact
from noise and food odours
·
The reference to glasses on the pavement was misleading - glass would not be used by the applicants - only drink cans
·
The applicants were eco-friendly - they would avoid
using polystyrene trays
·
There would be no increase in
noise - the noise would be dispersed from the existing shops - namely, no additional noise
Cllr Huw Wyn Jones
(Local Member)
·
That opening until 3:30am was unreasonable, especially on a Monday evening
·
Bangor Uchaf tended to close down at around 1:00am and therefore why
did this premises need to be open much later?
·
Concern that it may create a 'new
market' with people travelling from afar to get
food in the early hours of the morning.
·
Concern about the increase in parking
and noise
·
Albert Street backed onto the premises
Cllr Medwyn Hughes
·
He accepted that noise would
be dispersed, however this would not make the area less
quiet
·
Although measures had been included for exclusions,
how will these be monitored? Are the Police monitoring the situation?
·
There was a need to consider the impact of public nuisance, noise, litter and
odours on local residents
Elizabeth Williams (North Wales Police)
·
Discussions had been held with
the applicant who had agreed to install CCTV
·
There were no complaints from
the site or evidence to object the application
In response to a question from one of the Sub-committee Members regarding any history
of trouble in Bangor Uchaf after midnight, it was noted that not many complaints had been received. With public houses closing
at 1:00am no complaints had
been received about the eating places or of crime and disorder.
Taking advantage of the right to summarise their case, the Licensing Manager noted:
·
That the application was
for a late-night refreshment licence and similar businesses
in the area had already received a late-night refreshment licence
·
It was accepted that there was a potential of creating a noise nuisance however, conditions had been imposed
·
The operating schedule promised that the applicant would adhere to the conditions, however any party could
submit an application to review the licence if any
issues arose from the premises
·
The Licensing Unit had no specific evidence
from the premises to suggest that the application undermined the licensing objectives
Taking advantage of the right to summarise their case, the applicant's representative noted, that they were
experienced persons and familiar with
working in Bangor Uchaf. It
was added that they ran an effective
business and were willing to adhere to conditions; they were eco-friendly
and they did not want to create ill-feeling.
c)
All parties were thanked for
making representations on the application.
The respondents and
the Licensing Manager withdrew from the meeting while the Sub-committee members discussed the application.
In reaching its decision, the Sub-committee considered the applicant's
application form along with written comments submitted by interested parties,
the Licensing Officer's report, and the oral comments from each party at the
hearing. The Council's Licensing Policy
and Home Office guidelines were considered. The Sub-committee gave appropriate consideration to all the observations and
were weighed up against the licensing objectives under the Licensing Act 2003,
namely:
i.
Prevention of crime and disorder
ii.
Prevention of public nuisance
iii.
Ensuring public safety
iv.
Protection of children from harm.
Observations that
were irrelevant to the above objectives were disregarded.
RESOLVED to approve
the application.
The licence was given as follows:
Opening hours
Sunday 16:00 - 02:30
Monday 16:00 - 03:00
Tuesday 16:00 - 02:30
Wednesday 16:00 - 03:00
Thursday 16:00 - 02:30
Friday 16:00 - 03:30
Saturday 16:00 - 03:30
Late night
refreshment: On and Off
the Premises
Sunday 16:00 - 02:30
Monday 16:00 - 03:00
Tuesday 16:00 - 02:30
Wednesday 16:00 - 03:00
Thursday 16:00 - 02:30
Friday 16:00 - 03:30
Saturday 16:00 - 03:30
Incorporate the matters prescribed in the Schedule of Actions (Section M) of the application as conditions on the licence.
That the conditions recommended by the Police should be incorporated as conditions on the licence.
Reasons
In the context of Crime and Disorder, no relevant evidence
was presented in relation to the premises. Observations had been submitted by the Police recommending conditions, and the applicant confirmed that he was happy for
these to be included as conditions on the licence. The Sub-committee emphasised the importance of adhering to the Police conditions and the need to retain CCTV recordings for at least a month.
In the context of Prevention
of public nuisance, the
Sub-committee noted and acknowledged the concerns submitted in the written observations and expressed at the hearing. However, the purpose of the application was to bring the opening times of the premises in line
with the opening hours of similar premises (although there was a little variation in relation
to Monday and Wednesday evenings, in the opinion of the Sub-committee this was not significant). No evidence was submitted that problems arose from the premises nor was there evidence
to suggest that approving the application would lead to such
problems. As noted during the hearing, should any issues
arise, legislation would permit making
an application to review the licence.
Under the circumstances, the Sub-committee
was satisfied that the application was in keeping with the four licensing objectives, and therefore the application was approved.
The Solicitor reported
that the decision would be formally confirmed by letter to everyone who had submitted written observations. It was
added that all parties to the application had
the right to submit an appeal to Caernarfon Magistrates' Court against the Sub-committee's decision. Any such
appeal should be lodged by giving notice of appeal to the Chief Executive, Llandudno Magistrates’ Court, Llandudno within 21 days of the date that the appellant
receives the letter (or a copy of the letter) confirming the decision.
Supporting documents: