To update the committee on
the Care Inspectorate’s findings and the Department’s programme of work to
respond to them. Huw ap
Tegwyn and Myfanwy Moran from Care Inspectorate Wales will be attending.
Decision:
a) To accept the report and the
findings of the Care Inspectorate, noting the observations made during the
meeting.
b) To accept the work programme of the Adults,
Health and Well-being Department to the response
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for Adults,
Health and Well-being highlighted that Care Inspectorate Wales had undertaken
an inspection on the performance of the Council's Adults Services during
September 2022. He reiterated that the Department was aware of the matters
identified.
Myfanwy Moran and Huw ap Tegwyn (Care Inspectorate Wales) were welcomed to the
meeting. Members were given a presentation which reported on the findings of
the Evaluation Survey of Cyngor Gwynedd's Adults Services, September 2022.
Reference was made to four fields the inspectorate had investigated and to the
Council's strengths when responding to those requirements. It was highlighted
that Cyngor Gwynedd was expected to consider the fields noted for improvement
and take the appropriate actions to address those fields. The CIW would monitor
progress through its ongoing performance review activity with the Local
Authority.
Gratitude was expressed for the presentation
During the discussion, the following
observations were submitted by members:
·
The Department was congratulated for its work
·
Nothing astounding had been found and this was
encouraging
In response to
observations and questions submitted by members, it was noted:-
·
When consulting with users and carers, a sample of
files had been reviewed and discussions and focus groups were held, which included
workers in the field of care, Council users and users of private companies. It
was reiterated that considerable work had been done in an attempt to include
the voice of users.
·
There was no reference to Support Services or Support
Workers due to the nature and limits of the inspection. It was noted that the
'field' and 'specific location' element was irrelevant to this inspection as
the work examined the service as a whole. In the context of the Support
Services elements, this would have been gathered by reviewing the files. It was
reiterated that Inspectors had discussed with focus groups, Support Services in
the third sector and the Council. In response, if the Council's Support
Services commissioned a Support Service it was highlighted that it should be
incorporated as part of the report.
·
With a lack of staff capacity and increased demand, it
was noted that the inspection had identified the shortfall and had drawn
attention to the matter as one that needed improving. It was added that
additional funding had been identified for 2022/23 to support the work but it
was difficult to attract qualified workers to work short-term contracts.
However, it was accepted that there was a need to be more creative when
addressing this in future.
·
Whilst accepting that considerable recruitment work
had been undertaken by publishing videos and advertisements, and that the
recruitment problem was a national issue, it was asked whether the Inspectorate
had seen success in recruitment in other areas or whether it was money that
drove the problem? A response was provided noting that some areas had different
schemes. A suggestion was made to consider the modernisation of services and to
consider examples of good practice from other Authorities - social enterprises
were a good example.
·
Although there was no certainty that the recruitment
situation had improved, it was noted that reviews were undertaken on a regular
basis.
·
To improve and further develop systems to ensure
quality and knowledge of performance, it was noted that bids had been submitted
many times for an additional resource to strengthen the team, but they had not
been successful. Although the Service had done well with some bids in the past,
perhaps it was not successful enough in response to the expectations of the
Government, users and growth in demand. It was intended to either apply for
grants or re-use current resources. A response would have to be provided if
there was a statutory demand to ensure quality.
·
The Service was open to consider structuring shifts so
that carers could get stability in other employment to strengthen and improve
the workforce. Reference was made to examples where students from Coleg Meirion
Dwyfor had work experience in the field and went on
to receive opportunities as casual employees. It was reiterated that, should
anyone wish to work in the field of care, potential working hours could be discussed,
and that the department was open to any ideas in order to attract more staff.
·
With the Health Board under considerable pressures and
prioritising making people better, it could be argued that the partnership
element was not given the same attention. However, with collaboration with
Partners being part of the Improvement Plan, it was noted that there was good
collaboration on a front-line level, but it was recognised that there was room
for improvement on the strategic elements.
RESOLVED:
a)
To accept the report and the findings
of the Care Inspectorate, noting the observations made during the meeting.
b) To
accept the work programme of the Adults, Health and Well-being Department to
the response.
Supporting documents: