To consider the report.
Decision:
a)
To accept the report, welcome the progress already
made since the first audits and thank the care homes’ staff for their service.
b)
Declare concern for care homes’ staffing
challenges and problems that emerge as a result of
that such as difficulty completing training.
c)
Ask the relevant department to consider how we
can ensure that every home reaches high assurance levels in the future.
d)
Ask for the Care Scrutiny Committee's Chair and
Vice-chair to be invited to attend the Governance and Audit Committee meetings
in the future when there are discussions regarding care homes’ internal audit
reports.
e)
Inform the Governance and Audit Committee members
of the observations and decisions of the Care Scrutiny Committee members.
Minutes:
The
report was presented by explaining that Cyngor Gwynedd had 13 care homes that
supported and cared for adults across the county, and that they were inspected
frequently by a wide range of internal and external auditors. It was noted that
this report gave specific attention to audits that had been held by the
Council's Internal Audit Service and they had inspected three care homes during
the 2022/23 financial year. Those homes were Plas
Gwilym, Hafod Mawddach and
Bryn Blodau. It was explained that the purpose of the
audits was to ensure that suitable arrangements were in place for appropriately
managing and maintaining the homes in accordance with relevant regulations and
standards.
It
was explained that the inspections had concluded that the assurance level of
the homes in question was limited, therefore there was a need to take steps in order to improve compliance with the controls and to
reduce the risks that were highlighted. In response, it was explained that the
service had committed to implement actions for mitigating the risks that were highlighted
and a list of those actions were provided in the report.
It
was noted that follow-up audits had been held in the three homes in question in
October 2023 in order to ensure that the service /
home had implemented the actions they had committed to. It was confirmed that
an improvement was seen in every home but there were further actions to be
taken in order to reduce the risk further. It was
explained that the number of matters that continued to need attention related
to staffing matters, such as training and supervision. It was noted that the
situation was challenging and varied between homes. It was confirmed that the
situation and individual homes continued to be monitored to ensure that the
actions would be implemented.
During
the discussion, the following observations were noted:
-
The
members expressed their thanks for the report and the progress made since the
first audits was welcomed.
-
All
care home staff were thanked for their work and commitment to their clients. It
was noted that the praise from the people of Gwynedd for the homes was very
good and that it was worth noting.
-
Attention
was drawn to the fact that the internal audit reports of the care homes were
submitted to the Governance and Audit Committee before the Care Scrutiny
Committee, and it was proposed that representatives from this committee should
attend the Governance and Audit Committee meetings in the future when
discussions are about care homes' internal audit reports.
-
Concern
was expressed about the fact that only three homes were being inspected
annually and it was asked how to ensure standards in homes that are not
inspected that year.
o
In
response, it was explained that Internal Audits chose three homes at random
each year to inspect, and other audits also happened, whether external ones or
internal ones by the service.
o
It
was noted that the service tried to learn from every audit and that any
comments or suggestions for improvements were implemented in each home.
-
Members
were encouraged to visit care homes in the county as the staff and the
residents would be glad to see them.
-
It
was noted that the individuals went to care homes with much more severe needs
now and this led to increasing pressure on the staff. Attention was drawn to
the domiciliary care staff who had difficulty meeting their hours as there were
no hours available, and it was asked if it was possible to get some of these to
help in the care homes.
o
In
response, it was noted that this was something to consider, and hubs were
created in some care homes for domiciliary care staff so that staff could
complete training, etc. but there was room to develop this further.
-
Concern
was expressed about the staffing problems, and it was asked if there was a need
to look at how the contracts were issued in order to
attract more staff. It was noted that the shifts could be long and maybe
offering a variety of shorter ones would be a way of attracting people to fill
the posts.
o
In
response, it was confirmed that shifts of varied lengths were offered and not
all of them were long ones that were over ten hours.
o
However,
attention was drawn to the fact that some members of staff saw it better to
work longer shifts as that meant working fewer days.
o It was noted that the department tried to do
everything within its ability to be as flexible as possible and that
individuals had a choice on what types of shifts they
wanted to work. But the need was noted to ensure fairness for the whole staff,
therefore there was a need to be consistent and sensible when considering what
was possible.
o
It
was noted that there was more work to be done to attract young people to the
field.
-
It
was asked how serious the staff shortage was and was there a need to depend on
agency staff in some homes.
o
In
response, it was confirmed that agency staff continued to be used in some homes
but not all. It was explained that the situation varied significantly with some
homes better at retaining staff than others.
o
It
was noted that there was a challenge in terms of competing with the Health
Board in context of weekend wages, etc. as they offered much better terms than
the Council.
-
Concern
was expressed about the lack of training / time to hold training and it was
asked had the department considered looking at other ways of holding training,
for example in snippets or virtually.
o It was noted that offering on-line modules was
useful if they had problems reaching the appropriate training levels but not as
good as holding the training face to face. It was explained that the virtual
modules were more useful as refresher sessions.
o
It
was explained that the training sessions were being offered in the homes also
and the department was open to holding the sessions in many
different ways.
-
A
question was asked about the external audits such as those by Care Inspectorate
Wales and was there a connection between the problems that became apparent in
the internal audits and in the external audits.
o
In
response, it was noted that the Quality Assurance Team was an internal team
that audited services and did the same type of inspections as Care Inspectorate
Wales.
o
It
was explained that an effort was made to coordinate aspects between the
different teams and that everyone had a role to play. However, it was noted
that there was a need to be cautious by ensuring that there was not too much
pressure being put on the front-line services in terms of audits.
o
It
was admitted that further work needed to be done on coordinating the
audits.
RESOLVED
a)
To
accept the report, welcome the progress already made since the initial audits
and thank the care homes’ staff for their service.
b)
Declare
concern for care homes' staffing challenges and problems that emerge as a
result, for example, difficulty completing training.
c)
Ask
the department to consider how we can ensure that every home reached the high
assurance level in the future.
d) Ask for the Care Scrutiny Committee’s Chair
and Vice-chair to be invited to attend the Governance and Audit Committee
meetings in the future when there are discussions regarding care homes’
internal audit reports.
e) Inform the Governance and Audit Committee
members of the observations and decisions of the Care Scrutiny Committee
members.
Supporting documents: