• Calendar
  • Committees
  • Community Councils
  • Consultations
  • Decisions
  • Election results
  • ePetitions
  • Forthcoming Decisions
  • Forward Plans
  • Library
  • Meetings
  • Outside bodies
  • Search documents
  • Subscribe to updates
  • Your councillors
  • Your MPs
  • Your MEPs
  • What's new
  • Agenda item

    REVIEW SCRUTINY ARRANGEMENTS

    • Meeting of The Council, Thursday, 7th March, 2024 1.30 pm (Item 10.)

    To submit the report of the Head of Democracy Services.

    Decision:

    Adopt Option 1 – which is to adhere to the current scrutiny committee arrangements and approve the actions to improve efficiency contained in Appendix 2 of the report.

     

    Minutes:

    The Head of Democracy Services submitted the report which asked the Council to

    adopt Option 1 following the review of Scrutiny arrangements. He reported that he was

    submitting the report on behalf of the Governance and Audit Committee, which had

    approved this option at its meeting in January, subject to work being done to improve

    the efficiency and operations of the Scrutiny Committees.

     

    The members were thanked for their attendance and their contribution at the

    workshops held last year and reference was made to the report which summarised the

    messages deriving from the workshops before the Scrutiny Forum had met. Councillor

    Paul Rowlinson, on behalf of the Scrutiny Forum, was invited to elaborate on the

    considerations of the Scrutiny Forum.

     

    Councillor Paul Rowlinson reported that there was no clear consensus at the

    workshops or at the Scrutiny Forum, with different members favouring different options.

    He also noted that the input of Audit Wales had been positive on the whole; reference

    was made to examples where Scrutiny input had improved the Cabinet's decisions.

     

    He expressed that Audit Wales did not suggest changing the current structure or the workload of the Scrutiny Committees. Nevertheless, it was noted that some members had referred to the workload of the Education and Economy Scrutiny Committee, noting that it was excessive.  After summarising the comments, a proposal was made on behalf of the Scrutiny Forum to adopt option 1.

     

    Members were given an opportunity to make observations and ask questions.  The following matters were raised by individual members:-

     

    Reference was made to the last action in the appendix where it referred to reporting back. It was asked whether this would mean that a report was created which showed members how Scrutiny observations relating to wording changes in reports were considered and accepted or refused. The member wished to see a process of reporting on this in existence so that members were informed as to whether observations were accepted or not.

    ·        In response, the Head of the Democracy Services noted that attention should be drawn to this provision regularly.

     

    One member noted that he had been a member of the Communities Scrutiny Committee for 12 years and of the 13 items that he had submitted, he did not believe that any of the items had been resolved. He questioned whether the Scrutiny Committees were needed at all since they scrutinised the work of the Cabinet members and it was believed that there was no point to that because Plaid Cymru members had the majority of seats on the Scrutiny Committees.

    ·        In response Councillor Paul Rowlinson noted that the members did not act as a party or specific political group when scrutinising. He noted that it was a statutory requirement on every Council to have a Scrutiny system and that the purpose of Scrutiny was to seek to improve the decisions of the executive. He believed that there were many examples where the decision of the Scrutiny Committee had had a positive effect on the Cabinet's decision. He added that it was illegal to operate based on a political group.

     

    A member and former chair of the Care Scrutiny Committee for four years commented; he wished to express that Scrutiny worked. He reported that he had worked very closely with a member of a different political group as vice-chair of the Care Scrutiny Committee and that this working relationship had been successful. He wished to take the opportunity to thank the members of the Care Scrutiny Committee for their work and expressed a desire to continue with the existing Scrutiny procedure. He believed that the system worked and referred to a positive relationship with the Cabinet Member for Adults, Health and Well-being and the Cabinet Member for Children and Families, who were supportive of the work of the Care Scrutiny Committee and the Committee were supportive of them. He believed that many good things were being done as a result of the Care Scrutiny Committee and that it was a good example of cross-party collaboration.

     

    Supporting documents:

    • Item 10 - Review Scrutiny Arrangements, item 10. pdf icon PDF 231 KB
    • Item 10 - Appendix 1, item 10. pdf icon PDF 88 KB
    • Item 10 - Appendix 2, item 10. pdf icon PDF 87 KB

     

  • Last 7 days
  • Month to date
  • Year to date
  • The previous Month
  • All Dates Before
  • All Dates After
  • Date Range
Start Date
PrevNext
July 2025
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
End Date
PrevNext
July 2025
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
  • Y saith diwrnod diwethaf
  • Y mis hyd yma
  • Y flwyddyn hyd yma
  • Y mis blaenorol
  • Pob dyddiad cyn hynny
  • Pob dyddiad ar ôl hynny
  • Ystod y dyddiadau
Start Date
BlaenorolNesaf
Gorffennaf 2025
LlMaMeIaGwSaSu
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   
End Date
BlaenorolNesaf
Gorffennaf 2025
LlMaMeIaGwSaSu
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031