Proposed
works at the Viaduct Gardens region of Barmouth to include:
1.
Repairing, strengthening and raising the height of an approximately 60m section of sea wall,
2.
Erecting a new setback wall and floodgate/barrier in the area behind the primary sea wall,
3.
Install a new drainage network to manage surface water and overtopping in the area behind the setback wall and flood gates,
4.
Installation of Property Flood Resilience (PFR) in the Quay area,
5.
Installation of a new surface water outfall pipe that protrudes from the sea wall into the harbour.
LOCAL MEMBER:
Councillor Rob Triggs
Link
to relevant background documents
Decision:
DECISION:
To approve with conditions
1. Commencement
within five years.
2. In
accordance with the plans and documents submitted
3. Public
Protection conditions – timings
4. Submit
and reach agreement on a CEMP
5. Submit
and reach agreement on soft and hard landscaping details
6. Implement
the landscaping details
7. Plan
to protect the structural condition and permanent access of the mains public
water supply crossing the site
8. Plan
to protect the structural condition and permanent access to the public waste
water assets crossing the site
9. Working
hours of construction period
10. Sheet
piling hours
11. Implementation
of noise level mitigation measures
12. Installation
of noise barriers
13. Submission
and agreement on a Noise Management Plan for the construction period.
14. Archaeological
conditions
Note:-
SuDS,
NRW, Network Rail, Public Protection and Welsh Water advice to the developer.
Minutes:
Proposed works in the area of Barmouth Viaduct Gardens
a)
The Planning Manager
highlighted, that it was an
application to improve the flood defence mechanisms. The work would include:-
·
Repairing,
strengthening and raising the height of approximately 60m in length of sea wall;
·
Erection of secondary
walls with new floodgates in the area behind the main sea wall;
·
Installation of new
drainage network in order to manage surface water and flooding in the area
behind the secondary walls and flood gates;
·
Installation of new
surface water outlet pipe which obtrudes from the sea wall to the harbour;
·
Installation of flood
resilience equipment in properties in the quay area.
It was reported that a sea wall would be re-built and
surfaced with stone from the existing wall with a parapet wall section
approximately 1.2 metres above the nearby floor level. The existing rock armour would be
redistributed on the highest part of the beach across the front of the sea wall
and reinforced with additional rocks as required. A new setback wall would be
erected along the northern boundary of Viaduct Gardens, which would include
glass on the highest section. The work would also include a plan to manage
surface water with floodgates, gutters, drains and a variety of adaptations to
the existing system as well as a new surface water outfall on the beach. At the
end of the work, the public place in Viaduct Gardens would be restored through
landscaping work and the installation of new street furniture.
In the context of the principle of the development, it
was noted that the site was partially located within the development boundary
of Barmouth. As a result, and without any other options in terms of an
alternative location to provide the work, it was considered that the proposal
was acceptable in terms of Policy PCYFF 1 of the LDP. Reference was made to
policy AMG 4, which referred to Coastal Protection and asked for proposals to
show that a preponderant economic and social benefit would derive from the
development. It was also noted that proposals must ensure that there was no
unacceptable harm to water quality, public access, the built environment, the
character of the landscape or seascape and biodiversity impacts.
Several technical reports were submitted with the
application which included significant evidence that justified the work in
question.
In the Shoreline Management Plan, the policy for this
part of Barmouth, which includes the harbour section and the access road, as
well as seaside defences notes Hold the Line. The Shoreline Management Plan
states "There would be a need to maintain and raise
defences around the harbour and to maintain the road and railway defences and
probably to further reinforce the defence at Ynys y Brawd.
This is considered as sustainable and maintains the important use of the
harbour and access to the town." As a result, it was considered that the
principle of maintaining and increasing the height of defences around the
harbour, the road and the railway was acceptable in principle based on policy
ARNA 1 (however, the plan would have to comply with several other policies
which considered the impact on the environment).
In the context of design and amenities, it was
considered, as seen with many developments, the most detrimental impacts would
be seen during the construction phase and this would
be acknowledged in the Landscape and Visual Statement. It was considered that
the proposal, in terms of its form and finish, was acceptable and offered a
quality development in terms of the visual amenities by displaying a design and
features which presented and created a development that would be suitable and
appropriate to the site and within the wider area. As a result, it was
considered that the proposal was acceptable based on the relevant requirements
of Policy PCYFF 3, PCYFF 4, AMG 2 and AMG 4 of the LDP.
In the context of heritage and archaeological matters,
it was reported that observations had been received by the Archaeological
Planning Service, referring to the fact that the site had a potential for
archaeological features. They therefore recommended imposing conditions on any
planning permission to ensure a programme of archaeological work for the
development; by imposing an appropriate condition to maintain a programme of
archaeological work, the proposal was acceptable in terms of Policy AT 4 of the
LDP.
In the context of flooding matters, observations were
received by NRW noting that the FCA had shown that the plan would be an
improvement in terms of flooding risks in the area around Viaduct Gardens in
accordance with the Welsh Government guidelines, Adapting to Climate Change:
Guidelines for Authorities on Managing Flood Risks and Coastal Erosion in
Wales, dated August 2022.
When discussing biodiversity and ecological matters, as
part of the application, a Habitats Regulations Assessment, Habitats Management
Assessment - Preliminary Screening Report, Ecological Impact assessment and
Preliminary Ecological Appraisal were submitted. It was noted that these
assessments considered physical and coastal processes, water quality and
deposits, marine ecology and nature conservation, geological ecology and nature
conservation; and coastal protection and flood
protection. The Council's Habitats Regulations Assessment had concluded that
the proposal would be likely of having a substantial impact on the Pen Llŷn a'r Sarnau Special Area
of Conservation and that NRW had drawn attention to concerns regarding the loss
of a small intertidal habitat within the footprint and the possible change to a
coastal process because of the proposed high pipe.
It was reiterated that Cyngor Gwynedd and NRW were
competent authorities under the Habitats and Species Protection Regulations
2017 (as amended), and they must, before deciding to give permission to a
project that was likely to have a substantial impact on a SAC, either alone or
collectively with other plans or projects, making appropriate assessments of
the project's implications for that site, considering its conservation
objectives. The proposal submitted falls within the marine environment and on
the land and therefore the responsibilities of the Council and NRW overlap in
terms of appropriate assessment matters. With the impact on the SAC falling
within the marine environment, NRW would take the reins as the lead competent
authority. An application for a Marine Licence was submitted to NRW and an
appropriate assessment has been carried out as a result.
Having considered all the relevant planning matters, including local and national policies and guidelines, it
was considered that the proposal complied with the requirements of the relevant
policies.
b) It was proposed and seconded to approve the application
RESOLVED: To approve with conditions
1. Commencement within five years.
2. In accordance with the plans and documents
submitted.
3. Public Protection conditions - timings
4. Submit and reach agreement on a CEMP
5. Submit and reach agreement on soft and hard
landscaping details.
6. Implement the landscaping details.
7. Plan to protect the structural condition and
permanent access of the main public water supply crossing the site.
8. Plan to protect the structural condition and permanent
access to the public waste water assets crossing the
site.
9. Work hours of construction period.
10. Sheet piling hours.
11. Implementation of noise level mitigation
measures.
12. Installation of noise barriers.
13.
Submission and agreement on a Noise Management Plan for the construction period.
14. Archaeological conditions.
Note:-
SuDS, NRW, Network
Rail, Public Protection and Welsh Water advice to the developer
Supporting documents: