Cyflwynwyd gan:Cllr. Dyfrig Siencyn
Decision:
a)
Agreed
to recommend that the Council adopts the Asset Management Plan 2024-2034,
including:
·
The
financial sums recommended in Appendix 1 for the high-risk plan
·
The
two sums in Appendix 2 for the moderate risk plans
·
Uncommit
the financial sums in the current Asset Management Plan as specified in
paragraph 26 of this report.
b)
To
commission the Chief Executive to carry out a further review in one year's time
to seek a solution for issues whereby funding cannot be committed at present,
as stated in paragraphs 29 to 32 of this report, namely planned maintenance for
buildings and the next phase of projects to modernise schools, and report back
to Cabinet to confirm division of resources in relation to these two issues.
Minutes:
The report was
submitted by Cllr Dyfrig Siencyn
DECISION
a)
To
agree to recommend that the Council should adopt the 2024-2034 Asset Management
Plan, including:
·
The
financial sums recommended in Appendix 1 for the high-risk plans
·
The
two sums in Appendix 2 for the moderate risk plans
·
Uncommitting
the financial sums in the current Asset Management Plan as specified in
paragraph 26 of this report.
b)
To
commission the Chief Executive to carry out a further review in one year's time
to seek a solution for issues whereby funding cannot be committed at present,
as stated in paragraphs 29 to 32 of this report, namely planned maintenance for
buildings and the next phase of projects to modernise schools, and report back
to Cabinet to confirm division of resources in relation to these two
issues.
DISCUSSION
The report was submitted,
noting that Council assets were essential to be able to provide services to the
people of Gwynedd. It was explained that the Asset Management Plan was the
Council's long-term plan for planning ahead for the next 10 years. It was
expressed that this money came from the Welsh Government every year and the
Council received around £6.6m per annum and therefore there was a presumption
that around £47m of capital funding would be available for the 10-year plan.
It was explained as part of
the work to establish the Plan, Departments were invited to note their capital
needs over the next 10 years. 70 bids were received with a total value of
£129.3m. Every scheme was assessed and placed in risk categories. It was noted
that £79m's worth of plans had been placed in the high-risk category which were
seen as crucial plans for delivery.
A session was held with all
Elected Members to seek their opinion on the plans and to obtain support on how
to cut the spending requirements. It was recognised that the choices were
difficult but the need to fund some schemes such as the Small Group Care Home
for looked after children was highlighted and the suggestion to use additional
funding from the council tax premium for some housing schemes. Nevertheless, it
was explained that further schemes would have to be cut due to lack of funding
and it was suggested that money be taken out of older schemes also.
It was explained that
following all of this that the plan was balanced but there was a need to revise
it next year, in case some of the schemes were removed
due to grant funding which would enable re-allocating the money to other
schemes. It was expressed that the Governance and Audit Committee had discussed
the plan and was satisfied that the procedure being followed was thorough and
accurate. The Cabinet was asked to recommend it to the Full Council next month.
Observations arising from the discussion
·
Concern was expressed
about the lack of funding available for high-risk schemes and that this was the
result of decisions made in Westminster.
·
Some light was shone on the
report with money being prioritised on schemes in schools, money for updating
harbours and to create a small group home for children.
Awdur:Dafydd Gibbard
Supporting documents: