To present
GwE’s latest Risk Register to the Joint Committee.
Decision:
DECISION:
·
To accept and approve the risk register subject
to identifying all risks as being HIGH risks (rather than MODERATE).
Reason: given the lack of
timescale and information, it is too early in the process to predict
differently.
·
Ensure
that information regarding specific plans and transition processes is communicated regularly (monthly) to the Joint Committee.
Minutes:
The
risk register was presented by Rhys Williams (GwE Head of Service -
Professional Learning), noting that the purpose of the risk register is to
formalise the process of identifying risks and take subsequent mitigating
actions. Effective risk management will
enable GwE to support strategic objectives and strategic priorities, make
effective use of resources and attain the outcomes as intended. It was noted
that the document is a working document which is reviewed on a regular basis in
the context of the proposed changes to the middle tier of the education system
in Wales and the transitional period of the Regional
service to the Local Authorities.
Attention was drawn to the
Financial Implications, noting that it is unclear how much the substantial
change in Welsh Government policy will cost in a financially difficult period, and also Personnel Implications where GwE staff morale and
motivation are extremely low. It was reported that there is no clarity yet in
terms of alternative posts for school improvement staff post March 2025 and
that fewer secondments and redundancies will affect the pattern of the team
causing an imbalance in the support for the different sectors.
When discussing the
individual risks, it was noted:
Financial - that a Transition Board
had now been established and a Project Manager appointed to lead on the work.
The Transition Board will lead to ensuring that a clear timescale is in place
and that the position of staff is known.
Human Resources - that team meetings are
organised to ensure that information about the transitional period is shared at
every level on a regular basis together with the options available in terms of
future employment.
Governance - that a remit is needed
which distinguishes between the responsibilities of the Transition Board and
Joint Committee.
The
Joint Committee was asked to review and approve the content of the risk
register and decide whether any risks needed to be presented to the relevant
Cabinet.
During the subsequent
discussion, Members commented as follows:
·
Concern
that risks have been moved from red to amber. Whilst accepting that the
Transition Board has been established, the timescale is still unknown.
·
That
there is a need to present the Joint Committee with a monthly update of
specific plans/amendments, particularly human resources matters.
·
That
it is too early on in the transitional period to be
modifying risks to amber - things take time, especially redundancies.
·
Proposed
to keep the risks red. Whilst accepting the difficulty of the situation and
that matters are developing; information is not available and too many
questions remain unanswered.
A motion was made and
seconded that all risks should remain in the HIGH/RED category.
IT WAS DECIDED:
·
To
accept and approve the risk register subject to all risks being noted as HIGH
risks (rather than MODERATE/AMBER).
Reason: given the lack of timescale
and information, that it is too early in the process to predict differently.
·
Ensure that information regarding specific plans and transition
processes is communicated regularly (monthly) to the Joint Committee.
Supporting documents: