Application for the erection of 16 dwellings with associated
access, parking and landscaping
Local Member: Councillor Huw Rowlands
Decision:
DECISION: TO APPROVE subject to
the following conditions:-
1. Five years.
2. In accordance with the documents/plans submitted with the
application.
3. Natural slate.
4. Samples of materials and colours for the houses to be agreed
with the LPA.
5. Highway Conditions.
6. Soft and hard landscaping.
7. Biodiversity and Tree Conditions including
biodiversity enhancements and a habitats management plan.
8. Working hours limited to 8:00 - 18:00 during the week, 08:00 - 12:00 on a Saturday and no working
at all on Sundays and Bank Holidays.
9. Agree on details regarding Welsh names for
the development together with advertising signage informing of and promoting
the development within and outside the site.
10. Ensure a plan/arrangements to provide the affordable units.
11. Removal of general development rights for the affordable units.
12. Submit a Construction Method Statement
including parking provision for the builders' vehicles.
13. Submit outdoor lighting details to be agreed
with the LPA prior to installation.
14. Archaeological mitigation measures condition.
15. Provide and safeguard the open space for the future
16. Welsh Water Condition
17. Public protection conditions (Noise, Dust, Nuisance)
18. Construction environmental management plan
19. Details of PV solar panels on the roofs of
the houses and the air source heat pumps.
20. Welsh language Signs
Notes: Welsh Water, Highways, SUDS
Minutes:
Application to erect 16
dwellings with associated access, parking and landscaping.
Attention was drawn to the late observations form.
a) The Development Control Team Leader highlighted that this was a full
application to provide 16 affordable homes with a mix of houses, bungalows and
flats that would also provide access for pedestrians to the A487, a vehicular
access to the site and a formal play area with equipment in the centre of the
site. It was explained that the site stood partly
within the development boundary of the village of Dinas, opposite a garage and
an outdoor equipment shop, with residential houses located opposite it and to
its side. It was reiterated that the site had been used as a compound for a
housing development located directly next door and was previously an informal
car park after the demolition of a restaurant that had been located there.
As the
majority of the site was located within the development boundary of
Dinas the application was considered under Policy TAI 4, but there was also a
small part of the site outside the development boundary, and it was therefore
subject to policy TAI 16 as an exception site. It was reported that the
indicative housing supply level for Dinas, along with the number of units
completed and the land bank meant that the village would exceed its indicative
growth level, and justification would be required for the proposal along with a
language statement.
It was expressed that the
houses would be managed by Adra, a Registered Social
Housing Landlord which provided community housing for the area. It was noted
that an Affordable Housing Statement and a Housing Mix Statement had been
submitted with the application noting there was a proven need for smaller
houses to meet the needs of smaller families. In terms of planning policy, it
was considered that the proposal provided an appropriate number of affordable
housing and that an appropriate mix of housing has been proposed in accordance
with the need identified and confirmed by the Strategic Housing Unit. In addition, reference was made to the Unit's
figures which confirmed a shortage of 255 units in the Villages and Clusters
tier, due to this and due to the proven need, it was considered there was
justification for the units.
It was reported that all units were being proposed as
affordable and in order to manage the affordable
provision in planning policy terms, it was proposed to impose a standard
condition that would require the applicant to comply with the affordable
housing provision plan. It was noted that the Affordable Housing Supplementary
Planning Guidance confirmed the need for affordable housing within Villages to
provide for the local need, namely people who needed an affordable house and
who had lived in the Village or a surrounding rural village for a continuous
period of five years or more; the Guidance also confirmed that a nearby rural
area was defined as any Community Council that was 6km from the development
site excluding properties within the development boundary of any settlement,
other than the settlement within which the application was located.
A Welsh Language Statement was submitted with the
application which had concluded that it was not expected that the proposed
development would lead to any negative impacts on the Welsh language and was
likely to have a minor beneficial impact given that this was a proposal for
affordable homes for local people. The observations of the Welsh Language Unit
on the development had been received and they were of the view that the
proposal would have a minor positive impact on the Welsh language in the area.
It was noted that the objections received had noted
that the Gwynedd Common Housing Allocations Policy did not consider the Welsh
language, and therefore there could be no certainty what the impact of the
development would be on the Welsh language. It was reiterated that the
applicant's agent had provided information highlighting that 94% of the
residents of Gwêl y Foel
estate (a nearby housing development provided by Adra)
were Welsh speakers (a percentage that was higher than the percentage for Llanwnda ward at 81%). Although objections had highlighted
the concern about the allocations policy, the development would have to comply
firstly with the planning permission that required the provision to be for
local people. Consequently, it was not considered there was evidence that the
proposal was likely to have a harmful impact on the Welsh Language.
It was considered that the design and finish of the
houses was acceptable and appropriate for the area. It was reiterated that it
was intended to landscape around the site, and it was considered appropriate to
receive the full details of the landscaping as a planning condition. The site
had been designed to avoid significant detrimental impact on the neighbouring
properties and it would not have a detrimental impact on the privacy or
amenities of any nearby resident.
It was noted that there was an objection to
intensifying the use of the access to the development located directly next
door to the proposal, rather than using the access from the site to the A487.
In response, it was necessary to consider the proposal on its own merits, and
on the basis that using the access via the adjacent estate was acceptable to
the Transportation Unit, there was no basis to consider any other option.
It was also noted that the proposal was subject to a
Habitats Regulations Assessment and the Local Planning Authority (LPA) was the
competent authority to undertake the assessment. Originally, it had been
reported that Natural Resources Wales had confirmed that they had significant
concerns about the increase in phosphate emissions from a sewage treatment
works to Afon Gwyrfai and the impact this could have
on the river that was a Special Area of Conservation. By now, however, a review
of the Welsh Water Environmental Permit for the discharge of treated water into
Afon Gwyrfai from Llanfaglan
Sewage Treatment Works had taken place and a phosphorus limit had been
implemented. Welsh Water confirmed that
the Llanfaglan Sewage Treatment Works had capacity to
process sewage from the proposal within its phosphorous limit and based on this
information the Council's Biodiversity Unit (on behalf of the LPA) had reached
the conclusion that the proposed development was unlikely to have a significant
impact on afon Gwyrfai.
It was reported that
Ecological and Trees Reports had been submitted as part of the planning
application along with a green infrastructure statement, and they were
considered acceptable subject to planning conditions.
In terms of education, the proposal would not lead to
nearby schools exceeding their capacity and therefore a financial contribution
would not be required. The proposal would also provide a play area with
equipment that would contribute positively towards the shortage that had been
highlighted in the area.
Having considered all
relevant planning matters it was considered that the proposal was acceptable,
and it complied with the requirements of relevant local and national policies.
The officers recommended approving the application with conditions.
b)
Taking advantage of the right to speak, the officer representing Adra, noted the following observations:
·
The proposal would
provide 16 affordable homes that would meet Gwynedd's housing needs.
·
The development was
subject to grant support from Cyngor Gwynedd in response to the housing crisis.
·
Phase one of Gwêl y Foel to construct 24
affordable homes had been completed with local people living in the houses.
·
The proposal offered a
good mix of housing.
·
Adra had worked jointly will all consultees.
·
The plans were
acceptable.
·
The officers
recommended approving the proposal - the application complied with local and
national policies.
·
Information
demonstrated that 94% of the residents of phase one of the Gwêl
y Foel estate were Welsh speakers which was
substantially more than the 81% in Llanwnda ward and
64% in the county.
·
That phase one
allocation policies had ensured that the tenants had a local connection to the
ward.
·
There was an urgent
need for homes.
c)
Taking advantage of the right to
speak, the Local Member made the following comments:
·
The proposal responded
to the need for affordable homes, but there was no evidence there would be no
impact on the Welsh language in the local community.
·
Accepted that phase one
had been successful and welcomed this, but there was no evidence that phase two
would be as successful -
language use had not been assessed.
·
Applicants could note
numerous areas on their Housing Options application form, and this therefore
muddied the figures on need - the figures had to be robust.
·
This was a case of
making assumptions about a situation and there was no certainty.
·
Concerned that the
Gwynedd Common Housing Allocations Policy did not consider the Welsh language.
·
There was a need to
review the Housing Allocation Policy.
·
Accepted that a
language assessment had been submitted but it had been completed by the
developer's agent. Did the agent have the relevant qualifications? It was a
theoretical exercise.
·
The Language Unit had
submitted a short, unsubstantial assessment - no confidence in their comments
as the information had not been convincingly weighed up.
·
It was reasonable to
consider the comments of Llanwnda Community Council
which objected to the application on grounds that houses would be let under the
Council's Common Housing Allocation Register which operated contrary to the
Community Council's strategic aim of 'protecting and increasing the use of the Welsh
language'.
·
To ask the Committee to
refuse the application on grounds of a lack of evidence of its impact on the
Welsh language.
d)
It was proposed and seconded to approve the application
e) During the ensuing discussion, the following observations were made by
Members:
·
Although accepting the
Local Member's comments, there was a need to consider the Cyngor Gwynedd Housing
Strategy - local people needed housing.
·
Adra had provided evidence that it was local people who lived in the houses.
·
Although there was no
guarantee of the impact on the Welsh language, the Council had a responsibility
to provide housing for local people.
·
Adra had a good record of supporting the Welsh language - of allocating
houses to local Welsh-speakers.
·
Llanwnda Community Council had no evidence to support its statement.
·
The Allocation Policy
was successful and prioritised housing for local people.
·
That phase one of Gwêl y Foel had a percentage of
Welsh-speakers that was greater than the local percentage - the reason for this
was that houses were being let to local people. Housing associations supported
the language, the threat came from private housing.
·
The proposal would
support local schools.
·
Although the impact on
the Welsh language was not always clear in applications, it was clear here and
it would strengthen the Welsh language.
·
Where else were local
people supposed to live?!
·
There would be
opportunities for occupants to learn Welsh - the main language of the local
schools was Welsh.
·
There was no doubt of
the need for housing locally - the intention was for it to be funded by Welsh
Government.
·
The Welsh Language
Commissioner (2019) had noted that the language assessment carried out on the
Gwynedd Common Housing Allocations Policy did not comply with Welsh language
standards.
·
There was missing data
- the application should be refused based on Policy PS1.
·
There was a need to
consider the number of births - young people were moving out of the County and
there was no need for more housing, but nothing had changed - they were still
developing.
·
There were no shops in
the locality of the development. Which local school would it save?
·
The matter of
satisfying communities had to be addressed. Lack of certainty in information -
this needed improving.
·
Llanwnda Community Council had arranged a special meeting to discuss the matter
- their concern was obvious. Had the Officers consulted with them? Discussions
with local residents were crucial. Was Adra gathering opinions locally?
·
Dinas had reached its
indicative growth level.
·
That 16 houses were too
much for a relatively small section of land.
In response to the comments, the Assistant Head of
Department noted that no evidence had been submitted that the proposal would
harm the Welsh language, although evidence had been submitted to the contrary
noting a positive impact. He reiterated that the proposal contributed to
meeting the local need for housing met with the County's policies. He also
noted that Officers consulted with communities, and this was part of the
statutory process.
RESOLVED: TO APPROVE subject to the following conditions: -
1. Five years.
2. In
accordance with the documents/plans submitted with the application.
3. Natural slate.
4. Samples
of materials and colours for the houses to be agreed with the LPA.
5. Highways Conditions.
6. Soft and hard
landscaping.
7. Biodiversity
and Tree Conditions including biodiversity enhancements and a habitats
management plan.
8. Working
hours limited to 08:00 - 18:00 during the week, 08:00 - 12:00 on a
Saturday and no working at all on Sundays and Bank Holidays.
9. Agree
on details regarding Welsh names for the development together with advertising
signage informing of and promoting the development within and outside the site.
10. Ensure a plan/arrangement
to provide the affordable units.
11. Removal of general
development rights for the affordable units.
12. Submit
a Construction Method Statement including parking provision for the builders'
vehicles.
13. Submit
outdoor lighting details to be agreed with the LPA prior to installation.
14. Archaeological mitigation
measures condition.
15. Provide and safeguard the
open space for the future
16. Welsh Water Condition
17. Public protection
conditions (Noise, Dust, Nuisance)
18. Construction
environmental management plan
19. Details
of PV solar panels on the roofs of the houses and the air source heat pumps.
20. Welsh language signs.
Notes: Welsh Water, Highways, SUDS
Supporting documents: