To consider
whether the Authority should make a Definitive Map Modification Order
LOCAL
MEMBER: Councillor Menna Baines
Note: Appendices 1 – 19 included in pack
Appendix 20 – Treborth
Use Timeline (available on request)
Decision:
DECISION: To authorise the Council to make an
order under Section 53 (3)(c)(i), Wildlife and
Countryside Act 1981, to register paths A-B-C-D-E-F, as a public footpath on
the map and Official Statement.
Note: As the Council itself was the
landowner for most of the relevant period (1995-2015), it would not be
appropriate for the Council to support and promote such an Order should there
be an objection to the Order. The matter will therefore be referred to the Welsh
Government for a decision with the Order being determined through written
representation, a hearing or Public Enquiry.
Minutes:
a) It was reported, in August 2021,
that the Council had received an application with supporting evidence from Pentir Community Council under section 53 of the Wildlife
and Countryside Act 1981 to register a public footpath on the Definitive Map
and Statement in the Treborth area. The application was made on the grounds that
the public had walked along this path, as if they had the right, freely and
regularly (i.e., without the landowner's permission, without concealment and
without powers), over a continuous period of twenty years. It was noted that
the application had been supported by 197 evidence statements by people
alleging that they had been using the path. It was explained that the evidence
showed public use between 1940 and 2021, the date when the application was
made. It was reiterated that four letters of support and supporting photographs
had also been submitted with the application.
The path's direction was discussed in detail
(from its starting point on Public Footpath Number 12 in the Community of Pentir, along the junction with Public Footpath Number 22
in the Community of Pentir.
In the context of land ownership, it was noted
that the path crossed the land of Neuadd Treborth
(the former school), which was owned by Mr and Mrs Margeston
since July 2014. It was also noted that the path crossed Council land, i.e.,
the railway bridge, through Treborth Botanical
Gardens (which is Bangor University land), then through the Treborth
Business Park, where the path runs along unregistered land. It was reiterated
that many nearby landowners were also affected by the path. It was highlighted
that Cyngor Gwynedd had owned the former school and the land between 1950 and
2014.
A consultation had been held with all
landowners being affected by the path.
Attention was drawn to the observations of the
landowners, Mr and Mrs Margeston, who stated that
after they had bought Neuadd Treborth back in July
2014, people walking along the path had been challenged, and they had erected a
few signs noting that it was private land and signs stating No Public Right of
Way. It was highlighted that the family
objected to the application and had evidence noting that people who used the
path had been using it with the permission of the former Ysgol Treborth and Penrhosgarnedd
Football Club. It was reiterated that the Council was aware that users with
authority to use a section of the path claimed did so with the agreement of the
Council and Penrhosgarnedd Football Club (these users
could not be deemed as long-standing use).
It was highlighted, when investigating the
application, that the evidence suggested that users had also been walking along
the section between the botanical gardens, Treborth
Business Park and towards Menai Suspension Bridge. Although no public right of way existed
between these two sites, it appeared that users had been using it as a
continuation of the path in the application, to reach places such as the
Antelope Inn, Menai Suspension Bridge or as a part of their circular route from
home which commenced from Treborth, Penrhosgarnedd or Upper Bangor. Following this and legal
advice, the plan was amended.
In the context of the date of Bringing into
Question, in accordance with the procedure of submitting a case under Section
31 of the 1980 Highways Act, it was noted that there was a need to establish a
date when the public's right to use the path was brought into question. Many dates were considered but it appears
that the challenges had reached a specific level by the start of 2015, with
residents contacting the Community Council to raise their concerns. (Reference
was made to an e-mail received from the Acting Clerk of Pentir
Community Council (dated 22/03/2015, referring to the residents of the Treborth area being prevented from walking along a path
that they had been using for years). It was considered that the evidence
showed, on the balance of probability, that the public had used the path
continuously and as a right between the relevant period of 20 years - between
March 1995 and March 2015.
The officers recommended that the Council made
an Order under Section 53(3)(c)(i), Wildlife and
Countryside Act 1981, to register the path, as a public footpath on the
Definitive Map and Statement.
b) In response to a question regarding
the process, and should the Committee authorise the Order and objections were
received regarding the order, it was noted that the matter would be referred to
the Welsh Government for a decision. Under the circumstances, the Order would
be determined through written representation, a hearing or Public Enquiry. If
so, it was considered that the Council should take a neutral viewpoint.
Furthermore, it was considered that the applicant and the objector should be
responsible for submitting the case in favour and against any order.
c) It was proposed and seconded to
authorise the Order
ch) During
the ensuing discussion, the following observations were made by members:
·
That
the path was a perfect link from one place to the other
·
That
public use was made of the path
·
That
the details of the application had been presented well
DECISION:
To authorise the Council to make an order under Section 53 (3)(c)(i), Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, to register paths
A-B-C-D-E-F, as a public footpath on the map and Official Statement.
Note: As the Council itself was the landowner for the vast majority of the relevant period (1995-2015), it would not be appropriate for the Council to support and promote such an Order should there be an objection to the Order. The matter will therefore be referred to the Welsh Government for a decision with the Order being determined through written representation, a hearing or Public Enquiry.
Supporting documents: