To consider
the report.
Decision:
1. To note the NWEAB out-turn report for 2024/25 which includes the use of
£714,395 from the North Wales Growth Deal grant to demonstrate a neutral
position for the year.
2. To note the position of NWEAB's funds.
3. To note NWEAB's end of year capital review on 31 March 2025.
Minutes:
The report was
presented by the Statutory Finance Officer.
RESOLVED
1.
To note the NWEAB
out-turn report for 2024/25 which includes the use of £714,395 from the North
Wales Growth Deal grant to demonstrate a neutral position for the year.
2.
To note the position
of NWEAB's funds.
3.
To note NWEAB's end
of year capital review on 31 March 2025.
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
To inform the Economic Well-being
Sub-Committee of the financial position of the NWEAB for revenue and capital in
2024/25.
The role and function of the NWEAB was
transferred to the CJC on 1 April 2025, which included staff, resources,
commitments and financial assets, including the Growth Deal and funding.
DISCUSSION
The Report was presented for information
purposes to the Sub-committee, confirming that it would be presented to the
Corporate Joint Committee at its meeting on 13 March 2025 for approval.
It was reported that the final revenue
out-turn position for the year 2024/25 was an underspend of approximately
£386,000. It was explained that this underspend was an increase on the
underspend anticipated when reporting on the position in December 2024, which
was approximately £205,000. Details were provided on the main headings of the
budget as follows:
·
Portfolio Management Office - It was explained that the final net underspend on this heading is
£75,140 as a result of an underspend on employee
expenditure. It was elaborated that the true salary inflation in 2024/25 was
3%, where an increase of 6% had been budgeted. Attention was drawn to the fact
that an extension to the Shared Prosperity Fund budget until the end of March
2025 had allowed three officers to be funded within the UKSPF heading instead
of the core budget as budgeted.
·
Employee Expenditure - It was noted that part of the underspend within this heading had been
used to fund temporary advisory staff whilst work was being done to appoint a
Programme Manager after the post became vacant.
·
Support Services by the Accountable Body - Reference was made to the underspend of
£41,730 which mainly derived from underspend on support from the Finance
Service.
·
Joint Committee - It was reported that there was an
underspend of £48,935 in this heading, with an underspend seen on every
relevant line of the budget within the heading.
· Projects - It was explained
that the final net underspend on this heading was £65,034 as
a result of capitalised costs previously considered within the
'Developing Project Business Cases' budget line. Despite this, it was
acknowledged that a high demand for external legal advice on many projects had
led to overspending within the 'Developing Project Business Cases' line.
·
Grants
- It was noted that an overspend was seen in the Local Area Energy and the
Shared Prosperity Fund projects. It was elaborated that an extension on both
projects until the end of March 2025 had led to a net overspend of £96,820. It
was explained that the overspend associated with the Local Area Energy project
was being funded by the remaining grant funding. It was elaborated that the
underspend seen as part of the plans associated with the Shared Prosperity Fund
was being used to fund the overspend on the Fund's employee costs, as well as
contribute towards the overheads of the Portfolio Management Office.
·
Transfers to Reserve Funds - It was noted that there was an unbudgeted expenditure of £2.8million
within this field. It was explained that the North Wales Economic Ambition
Board had approved the use of the interest accrued on the Growth Deal Balances
in 2024/25 to fund additional roles in accordance with the requirements of the
governments, as well as project development costs from 2025/26 and to retain
the Portfolio Management Office's current resources for two additional years
beyond March 2026. Attention was drawn to the fact that this heading confirmed
that the interest received on balances during 2024/25 would be transferred to
specific Resources Fund to fund these costs.
The main income streams were listed for 2024/25,
namely contributions from partners, the North Wales Growth Deal grant revenue
allocation, contribution from the Corporate Joint Committee for staff
secondment, the Welsh Government energy grant, the UK Shared Prosperity Fund
and the earmarked reserves fund.
It was explained that £1.1million had been
budgeted to draw down from the North Wales Growth Deal Grant for revenue costs,
namely the 2.15% that the governments had agreed could be used. However, to
leave a neutral situation for the year, it was recommended to take £714,000
from the Growth Deal Grant instead of the £1.1million budgeted.
It was reported that there had been £211,000
in the Reserve Fund on 31 March 2025, reminding the Members that the North
Wales Economic Ambition Board had approved the use of £61,000 from this fund as
part of the 2025/26 budget, at its meeting on 14 February this year.
Attention was drawn to the fact that there
was a total of £29,000 in the Projects Fund at the end of March 2025 and that
officers had received the board's approval to use this fund to fund the costs
of the Local Energy project ('Developing Project Business Case'). It was
confirmed that these costs had been capitalised but that these costs had been
funded from the Project Fund reserves as the Full Business Case had not been
approved currently.
It was confirmed that the balance of the
Interest Fund on 31 March 2025 was £4.7million. Furthermore, it was confirmed
that there was £2.8million in the Resources Fund at the end of the financial
year following the transfer of the interest received on the Growth Deal Fund
during the year.
Reference was made to the end-of-year review
of the Capital Programme 2024/25, confirming that there had been a net
reduction of £13.3million in the spending due to a slippage on four projects.
It was detailed that these projects were the Digital Signal Processing Centre,
Smart Local Energy, Holyhead Port and the Former North Wales Hospital Site. It
was also noted that revoking the Deeside Anaerobic Centre had also contributed
to this reduction. It was confirmed that work on the Centre for Environmental
Biotechnology, Enterprise Engineering and Optics Centre and the Tourism Talent
Network projects had pushed a proportion of their profile expenditure forward.
In response to an enquiry on comparing the
statistics presented in the report with the last few years, the Statutory
Finance Officer confirmed that reporting on revenue matters happened on a
financial year basis. However, it was confirmed that officers would be able to
compare the financial situation with the last few years for comparison when
presenting statements of draft accounts to the Corporate Joint Committee.
Attention was drawn to the fact that capital matters already showed comparisons
over a wide range of years.
Supporting documents: