To consider any questions the appropriate notice for which
have been given under Section
4.19 of the Constitution.
Minutes:
(1) Question from Councillor Sion Wyn Jones
"Is it possible for the Cabinet Member to make a statement regarding
the lack of grass cutting in Gwynedd?"
Response from Councillor John Wynn Jones, Cabinet
Member for the Environment
"The Member
is aware of the very difficult financial situation facing the Authority and out
of this Council's decision in its meeting on 3 March, 2016 to implement 49 cuts
to services which included reducing the frequency of grass cutting in some
locations.
As a
consequence, we must, unfortunately, accept that this will lead to the
deterioration in the appearance of some locations at certain times of the year
and when there are variances to the growing season as evident this year.
The
relevant Department is carefully monitoring the effect of implementing the
changes and is also ensuring that locations where there are concerns regarding
safety are given priority. The Department is also adapting its cutting
programmes in order to mitigate the effect of this change. These adaptations to
the cutting programmes will continue for what remains of the growing season and
the year. I would like to thank Grounds
Maintenance staff for ensuring that the work is being carried out despite the
changes."
A supplementary question from Councillor Sion Wyn
Jones
"Is the
Cabinet Member willing to consider placing the responsibility of grass cutting
to community and town councils or having a new strategy in the
department?"
Response from Councillor John Wynn Jones, Cabinet
Member for the Environment
"Of course,
Gwynedd Council is willing to work with community councils in every possible
field, and this is one of those possible fields, but we must be careful not to
hand it over without certainty from the community councils on some matters,
e.g. with regards to public liability insurance and also that they will accept
responsibility should an accident take place and personally I think this is
something that they should seriously consider. I would be willing to discuss
any solution that is better than what we currently do. I congratulate the
department as it has been a very difficult growing season with such changeable
weather and all of us have experienced that in our gardens in general and I
believe that the department and employees who have been at the front line have
undertaken amazing work in recent months."
(2) Question from Councillor Aled Evans
"Will the
Cabinet Member responsible for planning report on the steps taken to make sure
that linguistic impact statements provided with planning applications under the
LDP are impartial, so that an applicant does not provide such a statement as
part of his submission for permission for any development".
Answer from Councillor Dafydd Meurig, Cabinet
Member for Planning
(The Cabinet Member's
written response was distributed to the members in advance).
"Currently,
we are determining planning applications according to the current Local
Development Plan and the question is involved with the Local Development Plan,
which will hopefully be adopted by the Council in March next year. Therefore,
what drives the linguistic impact assessments are the supplementary planning
guidance which are attached to the Local Development Plan. They are currently
being adapted and as I have explained in an article on Rhaeadr at the beginning
of the month, work is ongoing to update the supplementary planning guidance
that will be attached to the Local Development Plan and a consultation process
will be associated with that."
A supplementary question by Councillor Aled Evans
"Over the
past 5 years, 75 linguistic reports have been submitted, but only one
recommendation to refuse a development due to a detrimental impact on the Welsh
language. Will you examine these 75 cases and investigate what was the impact
on the Welsh language in order to discover how accurate these recommendations
actually were?"
Answer from Councillor Dafydd Meurig, Cabinet
Member for Planning
"We are
talking here about planning applications that have been determined under the
former plan. We are talking about moving forward and a methodology will be
developed in terms of how assessments will be undertaken and of course, this
will be included in the context of the new TAN 20. We are not quite sure what that will tell us,
where these assessments will be undertaken, and the councillor has responded to
the Welsh Government's consultation regarding that and all of us were given the
opportunity to be part of that. Thereafter, all of this is under discussion -
the shape of the new supplementary planning guidance depends on what will take
place during the consultation and everyone is free to participate in that
process."
(3) A question from Councillor Alwyn Gruffydd
"In view of the delay in any progress
on monitoring the impact of the existing and proposed planning position on the
Welsh language in Gwynedd in accordance with the Council's decision on 18
March, 2016, does the portfolio holder share the aspirations of placing a
moratorium on developments of more than three dwellings until a solution to
this matter is found that is satisfactorily to the Council and which is key to
the survival of the Welsh language as a viable language in communities in
Gwynedd?"
Answer from Councillor Dafydd Meurig, Cabinet
Member for Planning
(The Cabinet Member's
written response was distributed to the members in advance).
"I disagree
that there has been a delay in response to the proposal on 18 March. There are two very important work streams
ongoing, one to develop the supplementary planning guidance which will be
attached to the new Local Development Plan, and this will drive how we
undertake linguistic assessments. The second work stream is how we will monitor
and review the plan in future therefore, I disagree that there has been a
delay. The work is progressing and the article on Rhaeadr at the beginning of
June explains exactly what are the steps that have been taken in that
consultation process. In terms of a moratorium - that is not practical of
course because how does someone stop applications from being submitted. We cannot
stop applications from being submitted - we must deal with them and I do not
think that there is anything significant about three dwellings. If we stop anything with more than three
dwellings, are we therefore saying that three four-bedroom houses in the
countryside are acceptable and that four small affordable houses for local use
are unacceptable? That is the purpose of
the planning system - to assess applications as they come in. We are currently
assessing them against the Unitary Development Plan but once the new plan is
adopted, we will be assessing against that plan."
A supplementary question from Councillor Alwyn
Gruffydd
"In light of
the fact that I believe that there has been a delay, does the Cabinet Member
feel that he should give serious consideration to his current role so that he
gives room to someone who is going to respect the democratic process which is
part of this Council?"
Answer from Councillor Dafydd Meurig, Cabinet
Member for Planning
"I disagree
that the process has been delayed. The process has progressed correctly. At the moment, the current phase in which the
Local Development Plan has reached is in the hands of the Inspector and that
process is beyond the hands of the Council until it will return in March to be
adopted by the Council and I am confident that I will be here at that time to
submit it before the Council."
(4) Question from Councillor John Pughe Roberts
"The Council has received this independent assessment commissioned by
language organisations. Should this assessment be presented to Local
Development Plan Inspectors for them to use at their own discretion in
examining that Plan?"
Answer from Councillor Dafydd Meurig, Cabinet
Member for Planning
(The Cabinet Member's
written response was distributed to the members in advance).
"Councils
have already submitted all documentation to the Inspector. The Inspector is now
driving the process. If the Inspector requests other documents from the
Council, we will provide them. Indeed, he has asked some questions regarding
what is in the plan and the service responds to that. It is not possible for the Council to forward
any further information. Of course, it is a matter for any objector whether or
not they decide to forward any information to the Inspector regarding any
objection they have already submitted."
A supplementary question from Councillor John Pughe
Roberts
"Does the
Cabinet Member agree that every information is essentially important as
evidence to improve the situation of the Welsh language in Gwynedd?"
Answer from Councillor Dafydd Meurig, Cabinet
Member for Planning
"Yes, most
certainly. All of the evidence out there is available for the Inspector when
the Inspector will examine the plan. The Inspector's work is to decide whether
the Local Development Plan is robust and should the Inspector require more
information from any one who has been associated with the process thus far, the
Inspector will request that information."