To consider
an application by Mr B
(separate
copy for sub-committee members only)
Decision:
DECISION
That the applicant was a fit and proper person
to be issued with a hackney vehicle / private hire driver's licence from
Gwynedd Council.
Minutes:
The Chair welcomed everyone
to the meeting. He highlighted that the decision would be made in accordance
with Cyngor Gwynedd's Licensing Policy. It was noted that the purpose of the
policy was to set guidelines for the criteria when considering the applicant's
application, with the aim of protecting the public by ensuring that:
• The person is a fit and proper person
• The person does not pose a threat to the public
• The public are safeguarded from dishonest persons
• Children and young people are protected
• Vulnerable persons are protected
• That the public can be confident in the use of
licensed vehicles
The Licensing Manager submitted the written report on
the application received from Mr B to renew a hackney/private hire driver’s
licence. The Sub-committee was requested to consider the application relating
to the individual's suitability to be a driver of a hackney/private hire
vehicle.
The Licensing Authority recommended that the
Sub-committee should approve the application.
The applicant was invited to elaborate on the
application giving information about the background of the penalty points, and
his personal circumstances. He stated that he did not use his phone to receive
a call or send a message, and that he had set the phone to charge while sitting
in traffic on the way home from work. He pointed out that he was driving his
own car at the time and had no customers in the car. He added that he enjoyed
his work as a taxi driver.
In response to a question as to why he had not
included details of the offence on his application form, he stated that he
lacked confidence in completing paperwork and that this was a mistake and not
an attempt to hide the truth. He added that, over twenty years, he had received
one speeding penalty.
RESOLVED that the
applicant was a fit and proper person to be issued with a hackney/private hire
vehicle driver's licence from Cyngor Gwynedd.
In reaching its decision, the Sub-committee considered
the following:
·
The requirements of 'Cyngor
Gwynedd's Licensing Policy for Hackney Carriages and Private Hire
Vehicles'
·
Individual Suitability
Guidelines
·
The report of the Licensing
Department
·
The applicant's application
form
·
The report of the Driver
and Vehicle Licensing Agency
·
Verbal observations by the
applicant
Specific consideration was given to the following
issue.
Background
In April 2025, the
applicant received 6 penalty points and a fine of £200 for breaching a
requirement in relation to the control of a vehicle and the use of a mobile
phone in contravention of Section 41D of the Road Traffic Act 1988.
RELEVANT CLAUSES OF
THE POLICY
Paragraph 2.2 of the
Council's Policy was considered, which states that a person with a conviction
for a serious offence need not be automatically barred from obtaining a
licence, but would normally be expected to remain free of any conviction for an
appropriate period as stated in the Policy, and to show evidence that the
individual is a fit and proper person to hold a licence. The applicant has a
responsibility to show that he/she is a fit and proper person. Paragraph 2.4
states that when an applicant has a conviction(s) or there are other associated
matter(s) to be considered, the Council cannot review the merits of that
conviction or other matter.
Paragraph 4.5 was
considered which states that the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974
(Exceptions) (Amendment) Order 2002 allows the Sub-committee to take into account all convictions recorded against an
applicant, whether spent or not, under the 1974 Act.
Section 12 of the Policy relates to motoring
convictions, and paragraph 12.3 states that an application will be refused if
there is a conviction against the applicant and he/she has not been free of the
conviction for at least six months.
CONCLUSIONS
The
Sub-Committee weighed up all relevant factors taking into
account the applicant's comments over the receipt of six penalty points
for using a mobile phone while driving as outlined above. The Sub-committee
accepted that he had been unfortunate to be caught trying to charge his mobile
phone instead rather than receiving or making a call while stationary in
traffic. The Sub-Committee considered that this happened while he was driving
his own car and not while undertaking taxi services. It was also pointed out
that just over six months had elapsed since the crime.
The
Sub-Committee decided to approve the application.
The Solicitor reported that the decision would be
formally confirmed by letter to the applicant highlighting his right to appeal
the decision.