To receive the information, consider the risks arising from the Medium-Term Financial Plan, and scrutinise the Cabinet’s decisions
Decision:
Minutes:
The
report was submitted by the Cabinet Member for Finance in response to the
financial challenges facing the Council. The purpose of the plan was to set out
projections for the Council's position over the next three financial years,
offering projections as well as proposals to address the financial deficit
faced by the Council. It was explained that the document was live and was being
updated regularly as information was received and the local and national
financial assumptions or projections changed. Any updates would be presented to
the Cabinet.
The
Head of Finance explained that finding cuts to the Council's services and
budget was not a new process, as cuts were now introduced annually. Pride was
expressed that the Council had managed to sustain services despite the
reduction in the departments' budgets, but one part of the work was to identify
the financial deficit, which was £40 million over the next three years and
further work was underway to try to fill the gap through a factual plan. It was
emphasised that the assumptions were based on information of recent years and
there would be pressure to spend less, look at increasing income and implement
saving plans.
In
the context of the settlement, it was noted that the lack of clarity from the
direction of the government meant that it was difficult to plan beforehand for
2026/27 as a result of mixed messages that there would be an addition to the
public sector budget from the Westminster Government, but Welsh Government had
warned that could not increase public expenditure under the current economic
circumstances. Reference was also made to the possibility that the Welsh
Government would be setting a 'rollover budget' for 2026/26, i.e., continuing
with this year's budget with only a small addition towards inflation. It was
estimated that the average addition would be approximately 1.5% to Gwynedd
under the allocation formula. Clarity was expected on the Gwynedd settlement
level by November 2025.
Matters
to be considered:
-
Annual
pay inflation for teachers would be 4% in 2026/27 and 3.4% for other staff
members - these were salaries that were agreed nationally and there was a need
to fund the annual increase
-
There
would be an increase in levies
-
There
was an increase in the number of properties paying tax, but no figure had been
included
-
A
reduction to the pension rate was anticipated following a valuation. The
pension fund was in a healthy situation and therefore offered an opportunity to
reduce contributions - a £3 million saving was anticipated here.
-
Every
Department would present a business case for additional funding, with a
rationale explaining why the addition was required. Every bid would be analysed
in detail, with the fund for this reduced from £8 million to £5 million.
Although
the time to respond to the situation was scarce (from receiving the settlement
to setting a balanced budget), it was confirmed that the hope was to present
various options for the next steps for the future.
The
Senior Executive Officer elaborated that it was difficult to find savings
without a further impact and, with uncertainty in the fields of care,
additional learning needs and homelessness, there was no need to rush to make
cuts. It was reported that briefing sessions would be arranged to provide
updates on the situation to all the elected and lay members.
Thanks
was expressed for the report.
In
response to a question regarding how the Council could continue to deliver
savings and maintain services, it was noted that pockets of efficiency savings
were available, suggesting for example, more technology use (although the
period of transferring and adapting the way of working was normally longer than
the period of delivering the saving). It was elaborated that the challenge was
to be innovative, using imagination to work differently, and although the
reserves did not fill the gap, it bought time before the plans came into force;
some of the plans needed to be refined and developed with information and
understanding of how the work would progress.
In response to a question regarding the
wording of the Local Government (Wales) Measure 2011 requirements, where the
Governance and Audit Committee was expected to scrutinise some financial
matters, including the authority's financial plans, where appropriate, and
who decided on what was appropriate, it was noted that this was the wording of
the measure and it was the Committee's role to look at the medium term
financial plan as the measure's statutory requirement.
Matters
arising from the ensuing discussion:
-
Savings
had been delivered in the past - this had to be considered as a risk, although
it would possibly continue
-
There
was a need to consider the suggestion of a roll over budget being a risk to the
Council
-
There
was a need to acknowledge the May 2026 election as a risk
-
It
would be wise to have a reserve fund, but this would need to be used cautiously
In response to
information regarding why Band D was used and whether there was an intention to
re-band due to a reduction in housing prices, it was noted that the Local
Government Act 2021 outlined the Band D use as a tax base and the Welsh
Government was committed to review the council tax bands although no more
details were available. It was noted that Wales'
bands had not been amended since 2003.
In response to a
question regarding unidentified funding and the possibility of receiving
additional funding, it was noted that, legally, there was a need to set a
budget by 11 March 2026, and therefore there was a need to highlight beforehand
where this additional funding would be used.
In the context of the
Council tax premium and the intention to earmark it for reinvestment in the
housing field, a member asked whether it was an option to direct this money to
another field, if it was not used. In response, it was noted that this would be
the Full Council's decision and although it was not currently being considered,
it could not be disregarded as a future option. However, any discussion or
recommendation would be transparent.
In response to a
question regarding the pension reduction and why a decision had been made to
take the £3 million saving in one year instead of £1 million over three years,
it was noted that the choice was a 1% reduction every year or to take the £3
million saving in full. It was considered that this was the best option with
the possibility that there would be more than £3 million as the final figures
had not been released.
In response to a
question regarding the situation should the Welsh Government be unable to pass
the budget, it was noted that a statutory mechanism was in place to proceed.
In response to a
question regarding the significant reduction in the population figures used for
the 2024/25 settlement and whether deaths was the reason for this, it was noted
that it was not the change in Gwynedd’s population itself that created an impact,
but the change to the Gwynedd population in comparison and not to the
population of the rest of Wales. It was noted that a reduction in students in
Bangor was one of the reasons, which compared with other counties with other
colleges and universities in Wales. In terms of the County's population
reduction figures, it was noted that information was available, and it could be
shared with the Committee.
In response to a
question regarding using approximately £3.7 million, which was an income from
plastic container tax and whether it had to be used for waste infrastructure,
it was noted that not all of the funding had to be
used for the recycling services, it was possible to use a proportion of the
funding on general expenditure.
RESOLVED
To
accept the information and note the situation and relevant risks in relation to
the Council's financial position.
Note:
Paragraph
2.10 of the Plan. Request to share information / county's population reduction
figures
Supporting documents: