To
scrutinise the Active Travel projects as part of the Council Plan 2023-28,
Green Gwynedd.
Decision:
It was
resolved:
·
To
accept the report, noting the observations made during the discussion.
·
That
the Committee welcomed the work of trying to meet the maintenance costs of
active travel routes.
·
To
recommend to the Cabinet Member for Environment that:
Ø
there
was a need to look at expenditure for the maintenance of active travel routes
and costs of grass cutting/growth on verges to consider whether there were any
potential savings.
Ø
questions
about the maintenance of active travel routes and a question about local issues
should be included in the public consultation.
Ø
risk
assessment arrangements should be examined.
Minutes:
The report was presented by the
Cabinet Member for Environment, Head of Environment Department, Assistant Head
of Environment Department (Transport) and the Traffic and Projects Service
Manager. The following main points were highlighted.
Members were reminded that there was a wide range of schemes in place
across the County, in both rural and urban areas. Examples were shared of
similar projects in progress by Council partners to give a complete picture of
the active travel network.
It was explained that projects were prioritised through the
implementation of two grant streams which were funded by the Welsh Government.
It was elaborated that one related specifically to active travel and safe
routes within communities and for schools. The need to assess different
projects to ensure that they met the criteria of those grants in order to be approved was detailed. It was updated that
active travel plans also received further consideration under the Regional
Transport Plan.
It was reported that active travel developments were being regularly
updated with different projects at different levels of maturity. It was noted
that this allowed new routes to be developed on a regular basis to meet the
needs of communities.
It was noted that the Department was keen to increase the grant
opportunities available in this area in the future. The ongoing challenge of
maintaining these routes was explained and members were reminded that capital
funding was provided to install the infrastructure but
no additional funding was allocated to the Council to maintain them. It was
acknowledged that a number of these routes were developed next to highways but it was emphasised that the work programme for
highway maintenance did not meet the needs of users of the active travel routes
to ensure that they were adequately swept and ensure that vegetation was
controlled. The hope was that successfully funding an effective maintenance
programme would achieve the aim of the project such as reducing traffic
congestion and ensuring that there were no parking problems in urban areas. It
was noted that the department had submitted a One-off Bid for funding to try
and meet the demand for this work this year. It was emphasised that officers
were also developing a package to support and equip schools to promote the use
of these routes into the future.
Pride was expressed that the Department was working with the Gwynedd and
Anglesey Public Services Board to develop routes that would assist Council
partners. A specific example was shared of an active travel route in the Penrhosgarnedd area of Bangor, where it was hoped that the
use of those routes would reduce the traffic and parking burden for the Health
Board at Ysbyty Gwynedd and the wider area. Members were reminded that maps of
active routes were available detailing their locations across Gwynedd and nationally.
It was emphasised that there was no risk assessment in place should the
situation arise where there was no funding from the Welsh Government for the
maintenance of the routes. Particular attention was
drawn to damage to the Lôn Eifion route in 2025
following a storm, noting that part of the route was now closed. The cost of
renewing the route had been estimated to be around £90,000 and work was
underway to find sources to fund it as soon as possible.
Reference was made to financial sources confirming that active travel
schemes would receive financial support from the North Wales Corporate Joint
Committee, with a view to developing a wider network of routes regionally.
It was explained that the development and maintenance of active travel
routes was the responsibility of Cyngor Gwynedd and confirmed that Town and
Community Councils were not expected to do so. However, Community Councils and
members of the public were thanked for their work in tidying up the paths by
assisting in litter picking and clearing the paths for users.
It was reported that engagement work had been undertaken within this
area of work as a public consultation on the Regional Transport Plan was
recently completed. It was also noted that over 2000 responses had been
received as active travel maps were introduced in 2001, reinforcing the public
interest in the development of the scheme.
It was noted that £2.4 million had been allocated to fund some of the
scheme's projects during the 2026/27 financial year, explaining that this would
not be adequate to cover all projects.
During the discussion, the following observations were made by the Members:-
The list of upcoming projects was detailed, noting that a number of developments such as a route between Caernarfon
and Caeathro had been scheduled for the long term.
Members were reminded that a fatal accident had occurred in this area stressing
the need to develop the path. In response to the observations, the Assistant
Head of Department confirmed that projects that had been scheduled for the long
term were likely to be delivered in approximately 10 years or more, with
medium-term projects being delivered in 5 to 10 years. Further, it was
sympathised that a road accident had occurred in this area recently and also recognised that this was, unfortunately, the case
for a number of other areas in Gwynedd that would
benefit from similar routes.
The budget for the maintenance of these routes was considered. It was
asked if there were any examples of areas where the costs of cutting grass and
road verges had decreased over time as grassy road verges were replaced by a
tarmac path. Similarly, were there examples where highway maintenance costs had
increased due to increased work in sweeping and maintaining active travel
routes as they were located on highway verges. In response to the observations,
the Assistant Head of Department thanked members for their observations and
stated that work would be done to assess budgets to look into
the matter.
In response to an enquiry, the Assistant Head of Department confirmed
that the possibility of funding the maintenance costs of the active travel
routes through a Visitor Levy could be explored.
In response to queries and observations regarding town and community
councils, the Assistant Head of Department confirmed that councils were not
expected to spend on active travel routes. They were thanked for their work in
working with the Council for their maintenance and for creating a network of
similar routes in some areas. It was explained that the Council was also
working with them in relation to the Rights of Way Improvement Plan and noted
that further information about that plan could be received in the future.
In response to a further enquiry on the repairs to be carried out on a
section of the Lôn Eifion route in Penygroes, the Assistant Head of Department confirmed that
this section of the path was expected to be open by Easter. It was elaborated
that work was being carried out over the next few weeks to commission the work.
It was pointed out that two members of staff were co-ordinating the project of
developing the paths and they were thanked for their work in trying to make the
paths accessible to users. He went on to note that this meant that it was not
currently possible to carry out inspections on trees in order
to assess risk, noting that if successful, the One-off Bid the
Department had applied for would be used to address this type of work.
It was stressed that officials were constantly lobbying for more funding
to develop the network of active travel routes, noting that projects that had
been programmed for work in the medium and long term would be delivered faster
if the lobbying work was successful.
The members expressed their thanks for the report.
RESOLVED
·
To accept the report, noting the observations
made during the discussion.
·
That the Committee welcomes the work of trying to
meet the maintenance costs of active travel routes.
·
To recommend to the
Cabinet Member for Environment that:
Ø there is a need to
look at expenditure for the maintenance of active travel routes and costs of
grass cutting/growth on verges to consider whether there are any potential
savings.
Ø questions about the maintenance of active travel routes and a question
about local issues should be included in the public consultation.
Ø risk assessment
arrangements should be examined.
Supporting documents: