To report
to the Scrutiny Committee on the performance of the Finance Department.
Decision:
DECISION To accept
the report and note the observations.
Minutes:
The
report was presented by the Cabinet Member for Finance, highlighting the red
and amber indicators. It was noted that one measure within the Income Service
remained in the red category, namely the balance of the value of variable debts
over six months old at the end of October 2025, and the figure was identified
as just under £3.2m. It was elaborated that this was an increase of £1.377m
since the end of the previous month and that £1.2m of that increase derived
from debts from the Health Board and another local authority. It was noted that
the other local authority's debt resulted from an administrative error within
the Council when an incorrect order number was given on an invoice. It was
confirmed that this issue had been resolved and the debt had been paid.
It
was noted that the Health Board's debt continued to be a challenge and the
adult service was in discussions with the Health Board in the hope that the
debt would be reduced. Attention was drawn to the tax collection service's
performance meter 'Current Year Council Tax Collection Rate' which reported in
amber and noted that the service had faced significant problems due to the
number of staff on long-term sickness. It was elaborated that the situation was
improving and the service appeared to have turned a corner and was getting back
on track. Concern was expressed that the council and non-domestic tax
collection rates were lower in Gwynedd than historically and compared to other
authorities in Wales, but doubts were expressed as to whether the way the statistics
were reported reflected the full picture. It was noted that, from the internal
information, the basic rate of collection of council tax was fairly normal, but
it was noted that the shortcomings mainly related to the collection of the
council tax premium on long-term empty properties and second homes. It was
emphasised that this could change the overall figures. The intention to look at
the issue over the coming weeks and months was noted to give a more balanced
picture of the situation.
It
was noted that, in terms of the Digital Plan, work was progressing well, but
particular concern was noted about the risks related to software licensing
costs, particularly given the expected increased use of artificial
intelligence. A wider expectation within the information technology sector was
noted that prices could rise after consumption stabilised, and it was noted
that this was an issue that the service would keep a close eye on in the
future.
The
Head of Finance stated that he was satisfied with the overall performance of
the department, although there were a few challenges in some services. It was
stressed that plans were in place to address those challenges with the hope
that better outcomes would soon follow.
During
the discussion, the following observations were made:
A
question was asked about the Health Board's debt. It was questioned whether the
problem stemmed from conflicts over invoicing or debt agreements, or whether it
reflected poor processes or payment delays. In response, it was noted:-
-
That the
problem had existed for years.
-
That there
was an element of delay related to systems, but also that most debts relate to
the Adult Service.
-
Disagreement
regularly arose about who should pay what portion of an individual's care.
-
That there
were rules and contracts to determine the contributions of the Council and the
Health Board, but that discussions on these contributions accounted for much of
the debt.
-
Officers
within the Finance Department and the Adults Service were working to maintain
the relationship and to put pressure on the Health Board.
-
Experience
across the six authorities in North Wales had shown that the Health Board, at
times, paid the authority that put pressure to bear on that day, leaving the
rest waiting.
-
Discussions
at the level of chief executives and directors of social services were taking
place to ensure that the six authorities work more closely together to put
constant pressure on the Health Board.
It
was asked whether there was any real hope that the debt would reduce given that
it was worse than in previous years, or whether it would lead to the eventual
writing-off of debts. In response, it was noted: -
-
That some
debts were close to the threshold where they could come under statutory
arrangements for writing-off due to their age, and that was why the service was
trying to keep the debts alive to avoid that situation.
-
This could
be frustrating as the negotiations could appear close to a resolution and then
the situation could slip back.
-
There was
a significant risk of having to write-off some of the Health Board's debt, but
even without the Health Board debt, the total debts were still higher than
desired.
-
That a
team of Ffordd Gwynedd support officers and one other officer were working on
improving the arrangements and effectiveness of debt collection.
-
There was
hope that the debt would decrease as these measures came into effect.
Questions
were asked about the use of artificial intelligence and whether an action plan
and protocol were in place for its use within the Council, noting the
possibility of using the technology to provide services more cheaply and
efficiently. It was questioned whether the Council was already using artificial
intelligence for tasks such as producing complex reports, and the desire for
clear control over its use and a plan to embed it in the future was noted. In
response, it was noted:-
-
That
artificial intelligence was becoming more stable within the Digital Plan and
that a specific project had been triggered in recent months.
-
That the
project sought to create case studies on the use of artificial intelligence
within the Council's services, with the intention of developing those cases
initially and then carrying out more detailed work to ensure safe use and use
that made business sense.
-
That the
work was being carried out in collaboration with a third-party company and that
up to six case studies were expected to be developed.
-
Limited
use of artificial intelligence was already taking place, with a small number of
officers using Microsoft Copilot.
-
The
service had been cautious in the beginning due to doubts about the software's
ability with Welsh, but it was noted that this had now improved significantly.
-
Technical
officers had created a few solutions to read and categorise emails to
prioritise work faster.
-
That
research and testing was ongoing but that use had not yet been widely extended,
indicating the intention to move forward gradually.
-
That the
case study project was intentional to create a business case and to identify
potential savings opportunities over time.
-
That
additional funding had been earmarked to move forward with this work before
applying further for funding to expand this.
It
was asked about a slippage in some projects within the Digital Plan and
questioned whether any project was of greater concern than others, including an
example where the project failed to recruit to showcase the Council as a
digital employer. In response, it was noted:-
-
The
Digital Transformation Trainee post was advertised twice to seek the
appointment of an officer at postgraduate level, but it was noted that the
necessary experience was not available in the market at the time.
-
That the
degree apprenticeship programme continued and the service was now on the
seventh apprentice, and that it was intended to go out again the following year
to try and secure the specific resource that had previously failed.
-
The
project that would cause the most concern should it slip was the human resource
and salary management system, noting that it was essential to be able to pay
staff and members.
-
That the
current system expired at the end of December 2026 and detailed preparation and
planning work had already been done.
-
That
letters are sent to potential providers and that there is then a period of
silence before confirming an appointment.
-
That it
was expected for this to be confirmed before Christmas with the intention of
starting installation work immediately in the new year.
-
The
companies considered were experienced companies who had worked with a number of
councils, and confidence was expressed in the quality of the options seen.
The
completion rate of internal audit work within the 2025-26 work plan was
questioned, noting that 47 pieces of work were within the plan, with 16
completed by 31 October (34%). It was asked whether this was in line with what
was expected for the period. In response, it was noted that the profile of the
scheme was different as much of the work was linked to community councils by
agreement. It was noted that the early months of the financial year tended to
focus on that work before then focusing on the work of Cyngor Gwynedd. It was
therefore noted that the rate did not follow a straight line throughout the
year. Confidence was expressed that the scheme would be completed. It was
stressed that the Governance and Audit Committee would be monitoring the work.
A
question was asked about a milestone stating that the Chief Executive,
directors and Head of Finance should meet quarterly to manage the effects of
national fiscal cuts, noting that this had not happened in the first half of
the year. It was asked whether there was a risk to the Council as a result. In
response, it was noted that it was not thought that there was a significant
risk, and it was noted that reports on the situation continued to be submitted.
It was elaborated that a report had gone to Cabinet and the Governance and
Audit Committee in October, and that further reports would go to both
committees in January. It was noted that the delivery of the savings plans over
the past few years had been high in percentage terms, although it had not always
reached 100%. It was stressed that the practical work was continuing in the
background, although the desire was to hold more formal meetings.
A
question was asked about the recent news regarding the Council's funding,
whether an estimate could be given of how it would change the financial
outlook. In response, it was noted that the situation needed to be reconsidered
following the recent announcements and that each department had been asked to
consider what savings would be possible. It was noted that the understanding
was that implementing the changes in April 2027 could be more realistic than
April 2026, due to the time needed to deliver the plans. It was noted that it
was intended to hold workshops in the new year to work pro-actively with
Members. It was emphasised that the budget-setting process would go to the
Governance and Audit Committee on 5 February, to the Cabinet on 10 February,
and to the Council in early March. It was noted that in terms of the level of
increase in council tax, more work needed to be done before a final figure
could be given, but the possibility of being around 5% without having to make
significant cuts was noted. It was noted that, prior to the recent statements,
there was a possibility that around 12% would need to be looked at without
making cuts, but that the picture had now improved.
There
was concern that many farmers were struggling to meet the 182-day threshold for
self-catering properties to qualify for non-domestic rates. It was acknowledged
that various people had appealed against this, and it was questioned how
successful these appeals were and whether this was going to be more of an issue
in the coming years. In response, it was noted: -
-
That the
threshold had changed recently, noting that the previous system allowed a
change to the non-domestic rates system after letting for 70 days a year.
-
That the
Welsh Government had increased the threshold to 182 days, meaning that a
letting would be for about half a year to be within the non-domestic rates
system; otherwise, the property would revert to council tax arrangements.
-
That the
first appeals were continuing and the decision as to which list applied would
be made through the District Valuer's Office and therefore it was not a Council
decision.
-
A report
would be submitted to the Governance and Audit Committee in January on possible
additional exceptions.
-
A
reference to a policy under provision 13A approved by Cabinet in November,
noting that this allowed the Council to look at possible additional exemptions
that the Council may choose to introduce, having regard to the risks.
-
That the
work was being addressed by the finance and the legal service.
RESOLVED
To accept the report and note the observations.
Supporting documents: