To
scrutinise matters in relation to footpaths in order to provide assurance of
operation.
Decision:
To accept
the report noting the observations submitted during the discussion.
Minutes:
The report was presented by Cabinet Member for the Environment, the
Assistant Head of Environment Department, the Traffic and Projects Service
Manager and the Footpaths Team Leader. They referred briefly
to the following main points:
They reported that public right of way paths were a valuable resource
that addressed several of the Council's strategic objectives, while their users
got to enjoy the diverse landscape of the County. They elaborated that they
were a means of ensuring access to fresh air for their users, a good way of
keeping fit and healthy and that they also reflected the history and culture of
the communities. It was expressed that Gwynedd's public rights of way network
was long, with so many miles of footpaths to walk that it was equivalent to
walking from Caernarfon to Cairo (2,418 miles).
It was explained that the public rights of way routes included the Wales
Coast Path, the Lonydd Glas network in Gwynedd and a number of active
travel routes that were being developed by the Council, along with other paths.
They referred to some of the service's challenges arising from budget
cuts, while there was an ongoing legislative expectation on the Council to
ensure that some of the paths remained open for use.
Reference was made to the work programme of the Footpaths Team,
explaining that their main activities included:
·
Cutting seasonal growth
·
Restoring infrastructure (bridges, walls,
gates, stiles, culverts)
·
Installing new infrastructure
·
Implementing a signage scheme
·
Responding to queries, complaints and freedom
of information requests
·
Dealing with all legal issues in the field:
o Maintaining the official map/record of public rights of way in the County
o
Dealing with requests for
claims, changes and diversions to the official network and map which were
subject to legal processes.
It was confirmed that work was underway to ensure that these routes were
as accessible as possible, swapping stiles for gates where possible so that
more users could follow the paths.
It was added that the effects of climate change and turbulent weather
can force officers to change the direction of paths, if it was no longer
possible to use them, such as if there had been landslides near any path. It
was noted that there were additional costs involved in doing this, which had an
impact on the service's budgets.
It was noted that work was underway to revise the rights of way policy
and the Rights of Way Improvement Plan and they confirmed that the service
would undertake a consultation on the matter. It was hoped that a cross-section
of various communities from different areas of the County would contribute
comments and feedback within that consultation.
During the discussion, the following observations were made by the
Members:-
It was pointed out that several paths within the county could not be
used due to overgrowth. In response, the Footpaths Team Leader explained that a
lack of resources had forced the Team to categorise paths according to their
usage, and he stated that there were no budgets or resources available to
maintain every single footpath within the County. He elaborated that the Team
relied on feedback from Community Councils and Local Members to identify which
footpaths were most used within their areas, and to hold discussions with the
Team. In response to a further enquiry, he explained that it was impossible to
remove any footpath from the network map without following a legal process,
this explaining why these paths still appeared to residents.
In response to an enquiry on categorising footpaths, the Footpaths Team
Leader explained that there were four different categories, with category 1 and
2 receiving the Team's ongoing attention. It was explained that these
categories had been formed with the help of the community councils as they had
reported on which footpaths were most used. It was acknowledged that this work
had been carried out some time ago now, but it was emphasised that the Team was
considering requests from councils and individuals to re-categorise footpaths.
It was noted that the public could view the category of any path they wished to
use by accessing Map Gwynedd on the Council's website. It was explained that
category 3 and 4 paths were likely to be ones that were not currently receiving
maintenance work.
In response to an enquiry regarding having input from occupational
therapists and disabled people to ensure access for all, the Assistant Head
explained that they had been trying to recruit more stakeholders to become
members of the Local Access Forum. The Footpaths Team Leader elaborated that
there were members representing disabled groups on the Forum and that their
comments fed into the work of ensuring access for all.
Particular attention was drawn to a section of Lôn Eifion in Penygroes
which had closed recently due to damage following severe weather. In response
to the comments, the Assistant Head acknowledged that it was hoped that the
path would have reopened by the Easter holidays this year but the quotes
received from companies to work on the path were very costly and did not
provide value for money. He explained that they hoped to wait until the new
financial year and for the path to reopen as soon as possible afterwards. He
confirmed that an update would be shared with the members as soon as possible.
It was emphasised that there was no emergency funding within the budgets.
The members expressed their thanks for the report and to the Team for
their work.
RESOLVED
To accept the report, noting the observations
made during the discussion.
Supporting documents: