Non-material
amendment to the design of planning permission C21/0411/46/LL.
LOCAL
MEMBER: Councillor Gareth Tudor Jones
Decision:
DECISION:
To delegate the right to the Senior Planning Manager to approve the
application subject to the following condition:
1.
The
development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict conformity with the
details shown on the plan(s) numbered 673-01B, Revised Elevation plan, Ground
Floor plan, First Floor plan submitted to the Local Planning Authority on 12
January 2026, and contained in the form of application and in any other
documents accompanying such application unless condition(s) to amend them
is/are included on this decision notice. Notwithstanding the amendments hereby
approved the remainder of the development shall be carried out in accordance
with the conditions and details contained within planning permission number
C21/0411/46/LL.
Minutes:
Non-material amendment
to the design of planning permission C21/0411/46/LL.
a) The Planning Manager
highlighted that this was an application
for a non-material amendment to plans granted under a previous Planning permission in 2022 for the erection of a building to keep agricultural equipment and feed including two stables
and a tack store. The amendments involved:
- Change the orientation
of the building on the eastern side of the site compared to the approved plans.
- Amend some
window/roof window openings in various locations
compared to the approved plans, and
- Amend the roofing
material to recycled Welsh slate instead of the permitted grey coloured steel sheets.
It was explained that
the building had already been constructed and substantially completed. The application was submitted following enforcement inspections and in an effort to regulate
the work completed on the site which
differed from the permitted plans.
It was expressed, in
accordance with the Council's delegation scheme, that the application was being submitted to the Committee as the
applicant was a close relative to an Elected Member of the Council.
It was reported, as it was an application for a non-material change, that the only issues requiring
attention were,
- whether the change
was so big that it would have a different
impact to the original plan
- whether the change
would have a detrimental impact either visually or in terms of amenities
- would the interests
of any third party or organisation be put at a disadvantage in terms of planning
- would
the proposed change conflict with national
or development plan policies?
It was noted that these were only
changes to the design of
the building and not to the size
or use of the building. It
was highlighted that doubts had been raised locally about the intended use of the building, but attention was drawn to the fact that a condition, which ensured that
the building would only be used for
agricultural use or to keep horses, would
remain on the permission and it would be possible to monitor any situation for the future.
It was not considered that
the changes had an impact on nearby
residents or were significantly different from what was previously
permitted - the application
therefore met the requirements
of policy PCYFF 2 of the LDP.
It was recommended to approve
the application subject to relevant conditions.
b) Taking advantage of the right to speak, the applicant noted the following observations:
• In accordance
with the Council's Regulations, the application was submitted to the Committee due to a family connection with an Elected Member
• The application for 2 stables, a barn and storage had been approved by the Committee in 2022
• The application was submitted following inspections from the Enforcement Officer in 2025 who proposed
significant changes
• There was an
amendment to the orientation
of the building, the roofing
material to Welsh slate and
the use of conservation windows
• The building was smaller by now
c) Taking advantage of the right to speak, the Local Member made the following observations:
• This
was a non-material amendment
to an agricultural feed building
• The building was rural, practical and sustainable
• The construction was good-standard: skilful architecture from local woodworkers and a local company
• It was an alternative plan and a building that will
stand for generations
• The building was suitable and purposeful - was striking and beautiful
• There was an
amendment to the building's
footprint and height, and there was a need to use recycled Welsh slate instead of grey coloured steel
sheets
• The enforcement officers were thanked for
visiting the site
• The building suited the Llŷn countryside and landscape
ch) It was proposed
and seconded to approve the
application. The item was submitted as the applicant was a close relative to an Elected Member of the Council.
d) During the ensuing discussion, the following observations were made by Members:
• The premises was similar to a bungalow
• Would the application,
in time, return to the Committee to be adapted into a house?
`
RESOLVED: To delegate the right to the Senior Planning Manager
to approve the application subject to the following
condition:
The development hereby
permitted shall be carried out in
strict conformity with the details shown on the plan(s) numbered 673-01B, Revised Elevation plan, Ground Floor plan, First Floor plan submitted to the Local Planning Authority
on 12 January 2026, and contained in the application form and in any other
documents accompanying such application unless condition(s) to amend them was/were included
on this decision
notice. Notwithstanding the
amendments hereby approved the remainder of the development shall be carried out in
accordance with the conditions and details contained within planning permission number C21/0411/46/LL
Supporting documents: