To consider
and note the contents of this report and the appendices
To recommend the revised Inter Authority
Agreement (IAA) to full Council on 5 March 2026 for approval as a reserved
matter.
Decision:
DECISION:
To note
the content of this report and the appendices.
To
recommend the amended Inter-Authority Agreement (IAA) to the full Council on 5
March 2026 for approval as an allocated matter
Minutes:
Submitted - the report of the Head of Finance and the
Investment Manager highlighting the need for the Committee to formally
recommend the Inter-Authority Agreement (IAA) to the Full Council for approval.
Members were reminded that the Inter-Authority
Agreement was the formal legal and governance framework binding together the
eight administering authorities of the Welsh Local Government Pension Scheme
into the Wales Pension Partnership. It was reported that the Inter-Authority
Agreement (IAA) was first approved in 2017 when the WPP was established, but
following a 'Fit for the Future' consultation, and the adjustments needed to
ensure compliance with UK Government requirements, investment management company
WPP IM Co. was established and incorporated. As a result, it was considered
necessary to undertake a comprehensive review of the IAA to ensure that it
remained appropriate. It was reiterated that while the WPP had been successful,
with good governance and arrangements leading to good returns, the UK
Government was unwilling to continue with the arrangement and therefore a new
investment company had had to be formed; under the 'Fit for the Future'
requirements there would be significant adjustments to the existing structure,
which would need to be operational by 1 April 2026.
Reference was made to the main changes in the new
structure along with the assurance note that Hymans Robertson (WPP's oversight
and governance adviser) had prepared for the eight administering authorities.
It was noted that the assurance note included input
from the eight authorities and provided an independent overview of the new
regime and the key amendments proposed as part of the recommendation.
Work prepared by Burges Salmon (WPP's legal adviser)
detailing all proposed amendments to the IAA was highlighted. The Committee was
assured that the proposed agreement had been scrutinised by several layers of
oversight which included discussions with the Steering Group, and that the
Monitoring Officers of the eight administering authorities had provided input
to ensure that the individual Councils were secure. Each of the eight
administrative authorities would follow the same procedure to approve the Inter-Authority
Agreement.
Thanks were expressed for the report.
The background work that had been done to prepare the
agreement within a tight timeframe was appreciated, as was the good scrutiny
work carried out by Hymans Robertson and Burges Salmon in highlighting the
implications.
Thanks were given for the information-sharing workshop
organised for members of the Pensions Committee and the Pension Board
(23-02-26); the discussion had been valuable and beneficial and took place in a
friendly atmosphere – reassuring the Committee that it was making the right
decisions.
Observations arising from the ensuing discussion:
·
Concern that the
Committee's role appeared to be as an oversight body, losing the right to
participate in the discussion on investments
·
Concern that the Committee
was losing its managerial role and responsibilities
·
Why was there a Senior
Officer and not a Member on the Shareholder Forum? The opportunity of having
the Members' voice on the Forum was being missed - the public contacted/shared
their concerns with Elected Members if things did not go well, so it would be
wise for them to have input
·
It had to be emphasised
that the approval of the Inter-Authority Agreement was a response to statutory
requirements
·
That the quality of the
background work was of a very high standard, professional and detailed - the
Committee relied on a standard of information of this level
In response to the observations, the Head of Finance
accepted that the situation was a frustrating one and that layers of complexity
were being added to the current arrangement which, to date, had been very clear
and orderly. He added that as the Section 151 Officer, he would be attending
the Shareholders' Forum on behalf of the Council (and not the WPP) where he had
a duty to ensure that shares and actions were safe. The Monitoring Officer
reiterated that the Council was a Shareholder in this situation and was
entitled to vote on the decisions to protect the interests of Gwynedd; that
could be discussed in the item on approving the Shareholders'
Agreement.
It was proposed and seconded to recommend the
Agreement to the Full Council
RESOLVED:
·
To note the content
of this report and the appendices.
·
To
recommend the amended Inter-Authority Agreement (IAA) to the full Council on 5
March 2026 for approval as a reserved matter
Supporting documents: